Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Is CGM ready for real time?

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 11-18

  Mazze, Roger S ^a,b   Strock, Ellie ^a   Borgman, Sarah ^a   Wesley, David ^a   Stout, Philip ^c   Racchini, Joel ^c  

^a INTERNATIONAL DIABETES CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c LifeScan   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ACCURACY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING; DEVICE; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MOBILIZATION; MONITORING; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

AREA UNDER CURVE; BLOOD GLUCOSE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 58149389636     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2008.0041     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Diabetes Association: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (consensus statement). Diabetes Care 1994;17:81-86.
2. Hirsch I: Blood glucose monitoring technology: translating data into practice. Endocr Pract 2004;10:67-76.
3. Dailey G: Assessing glycemic control with self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c measurements. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:229-235.
4. Laffel LMB, Kowaski AJ: State of the Art: Continuous Glucose Monitoring. American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Endocrinology newsletter, 2007;16(Fall):3, 7. http://www.jdrf.org/index.cfm?page_id=104576 (accessed September 12, 2007).
5. Fleishman V, Nocon RS, Spurgeon SA: Continuous glucose monitoring: planning for innovation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005;7:563-569.
6. Wolpert H: Use of continuous glucose monitoring in the detection and prevention of hypoglycemia. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2007;1:146-150.
7. American Diabetes Association: Standards of practice. Diabetes Care 2007;30(Suppl 1):S4-S14.
8. Mazze R, Lucido D, Langer O, Harmann C, Rodbard D: Ambulatory glucose profile: representation of verified self-monitored blood glucose data. Diabetes Care 1987;10:111-117.
9. nd ed., revised. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2006.
10. Matthews JNS, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P: Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ 1990;300:230-235.
11. Stout PJ, Racchini JR, Hilgers ME: A novel approach to mitigating the physiological lag between blood and interstitial fluid glucose measurements. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004;6:635-644.
12. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick L, Carter W, Pohl SL: Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:622-628.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
14. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the management of diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract 2007;13(Suppl 1):1-68.
15. Lebovitz HE, Austin MM, Blonde L, Davidson JA, Del Prato S, Gavin JR 3rd, Handelsman Y, Jellinger PS, Levy P, Riddle MC, Roberts VL, Siminerio LM; ACE/AACE Diabetes Recommendations Implementation Writing Committee: ACE/AACE Consensus Conference on the implementation of outpatient management of diabetes mellitus: consensus conference recommendations. Endocr Pract 2006;12:6-11.
16. Mitka M: Poor patient adherence may undermine aim of continuous glucose monitoring. JAMA 2007;298:614-615.