Visually matching daylight fluorescent lamplight with two primary sets

Color Research and Application

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 428-437

  Houser, Kevin W ^a   Hu, Xin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Color matching; Colorimetry; Prime color

Indexed keywords

COLOR MATCHING; COLORIMETERS; COLORIMETRY; DATA REDUCTION; DAYLIGHTING; FLUORESCENT LAMPS; RADIOMETERS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; SUBJECTIVE TESTING;

CHROMATICITY DIFFERENCES; DAYLIGHT FLUORESCENT LAMPLIGHT; PRIMARY SETS; PRIME COLOR; STATISTICAL DATA SCREENING;

COLOR VISION;

EID: 7744224130     PISSN: 03612317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/col.20059     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Thornton WA. Matching lighting, metamers, and human visual response. J Col Appear 1973;2:23-29.
2. Thornton WA. Lamps for assessing metamerism. J Illum Eng Soc 1974;4:11-18.
3. Thornton WA. Intersections of spectral power distributions of lights that match. Color Res Appl 1993;18:399-411.
4. Thornton WA. Intersections of matching spectra: applications. Color Res Appl 1993;18:412-421.
5. Thornton WA. A validation of the color preference index. J Illum Eng Soc 1974;4:48-52.
6. Thornton WA. Color-discrimination index, J Opt Soc Am 1972;62: 191-194.
7. Thornton WA. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part I. Introduction. The visual colorimeter-spectroradiometer experimental results. Color Res Appl 1992;17:79-122.
8. Thornton WA. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part II. Discussion. Color Res Appl 1992;17:162-186.
9. Thornton WA. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part III. Discussion (continued). Color Res Appl 1992;17:240-262.
10. Thornton WA. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part IV. Visual experiments with bright fields and both 10° and 1.3° field sizes. Color Res Appl 1997;22:189-198.
11. Thornton WA. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part V. Testing visually matching pairs of lights for possible rod participation on the Aguilar-Stiles model. Color Res Appl 1998;23: 92-103.
12. Thornton WA. Toward a more accurate and extensible colorimetry. Part VI. Improved weighting functions. Preliminary Results. Color Res Appl 1998;23:226-233.
13. Thornton WA. A system of photometry and colorimetry based directly on visual response. J Illum Eng Soc 1973;3:99-111.
14. Thornton WA, Chen E, Morton EW, Rachko D. Brightness meter. J Illum Eng Soc 1980;10:52-63.
15. Ábrahám G, Korosi H, Schanda J, Shapiro AG, Wenzel K. Anomalies in additive colour matches. Color Res Appl 1995;20:235-244.
16. Houser KW, Tiller DK, Hu X. Tuning the fluorescent spectrum for the trichromatic visual response: a pilot study Leukos (successor to: J Illum Eng Soc) 2004;1:7-23.
17. Stiles WS, Crawford BH. The liminal brightness increment as a function of wave-length for different conditions of the foveal and parafoveal retina. Proc Royal Soc London B 1933;113:496-530.
18. Jameson D, Hurvich LM. Some quantitative aspects of an opponent-colors theory. I. chromatic responses and spectral saturation. J Opt Soc Am 1955;45:546-552.
19. Thornton WA Luminosity and color-rendering capability of white light. J Opt Soc Am 1971;61:1155-1163.
20. Sperling HG, Harwerth RS. Red-green cone interactions in the increment-threshold spectral sensitivity of primates. Science 1971;172: 180-184.
21. King-Smith PE, Carden D. Luminance and opponent-color contributions to visual detection and adaptation and to temporal and spatial integration. J Opt Soc Am 1976;66:709-716.
22. Dresler A. The non-additivity of heterochromatic brightness. Trans Illum Eng Soc 1953;18:141-165.
23. Breneman W. Dependence of luminance required for constant brightness upon chromaticity and chromatic adaptation. J Opt Soc Am 1958;48:228-232.
24. Guth SL, Donley NV, Marrocco RT. On luminance additivity and related topics. Vision Res 1969;9:537-575.
25. Kaiser PK, Smith PW. The luminance of equally bright colors. CIE Proc 17th Session. Barcelona. 1971.
26. Kaiser PK. Luminance and brightness. Appl Opt 1971;10:2768-2770.
27. Guth SL, Lodge HR. Heterochromatic additivity foveal spectral sensitivity and a new color model. J Opt Soc Am 1973;63:450-462.
28. Alman DH. Errors of the standard photometric system when measuring the brightness of general illumination light sources. J Illum Eng Soc 1977;7:55-62.
29. Corth R. The basis for a new system of colorimetry. J Illum Eng Soc 1979;8:155-161.
30. Guth SL, Massof RW, Benzschawel T. Vector model for normal and dichromatic color vision. J Opt Soc Am 1980;70:197-212.
31. Alman DH, Breton ME, Barbour J. New results on the brightness matching of heterochromatic stimuli. J Illum Eng Soc 1983;12:268-274.
32. Howett GL. Linear opponent-colors model optimized for brightness prediction. NBSIR 85-3202. 1985.
33. Howett GL. The coming redefinition of photometry. J Illum Eng Soc 1986;15:5-18.
34. Berman SM. Photopic luminance does not always predict perceived room brightness. Light Res Tech 1990;22:37-41.
35. Lennie P, Pokorny J, Smith VC. Luminance. J Opt Soc Am A 1993; 10:1283-1293.
36. Bodmann HW, LaToison M. Predicted brightness-luminance phenomena. Light Res Tech 1994;26:135-143.
37. Houser KW. Toward a non-additive spectral weighting function for brightness perception. CIE Symposium '99, 75 years of CIE Photometry. Budapest, Hungary; 1999. 164-167.
38. Wright WD. A re-determination of the mixture curves of the spectrum. Trans Opt Soc 1929-1930;31:201-218.
39. Guild J. The colorimetric properties of the spectrum. Phil Trans Royal Soc (London) 1931;230:149-187.
40. Stiles WS, Burch JM. Interim report to the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage, Zurich, 1955, on the National Physical Laboratory's investigation of colour-matching. Opt Acta 1955;2:168-181.
41. Speranskaya NI. Determination of spectrum color coordinates for twenty-seven normal observers. Opt Spect 1959;7:424-428.