P-Drive on-road: Internal scale validity and reliability of an assessment of on-road driving performance in people with neurological disorders

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 86-93

  Patomella, Ann Helen ^a   Tham, Kerstin ^a   Johansson, Kurt ^b   Kottorp, Anders ^a  

^a Division of Occupational Medicine   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Automobile driving; Psychometric properties; Rasch analysis; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DEMENTIA; DISABILITY; DRIVER LICENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRY; STROKE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMOBILE DRIVER EXAMINATION; COGNITION DISORDERS; DEMENTIA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; STROKE;

EID: 77649138545     PISSN: 11038128     EISSN: 16512014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/11038120903071776     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Lundqvist A, Gerdle B, Rönnberg J. Neuropsychological aspects of driving after stroke: In the simulator and on the road. Appl Cognitive Psych. 2000;/14:/135-50.
2. Mazer B, Korner-Bitensky N, Sofer S. Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;/79:/743-50.
3. Wilson T, Smith T. Driving after stroke. Int J Rehabil Med. 1983;/5:/170-7.
4. Duchek J, Carr D, Hunt L, Roe C, Xiong C, Shah K, et al. Longitudinal driving performance in early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer type. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;/51:/1342-7.
5. Hunt L, Murphy C, Carr D, Duchek J, Buckles V, Morris J. Reliability of the Washington University Road Test: A performance-based assessment for drivers with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol. 1997;/54:/707-12.
6. Dubinsky R, Stein A, Lyons K. Practice parameters: Risk of driving and Alzheimer disease (an evidence-based review). Neurology. 2000;/54:/2205-11.
7. Odenheimer G, Beaudet M, Jette A, Albert M, Grande L, Minaker K. Performance-based driving evaluation of the elderly driver: Safety, reliability, and validity. J Gerontol. 1994;/49:/M153-9.
8. Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;/70:/308-12.
9. Akinwuntan A, DeWeerdt W, Feys H, Baten G, Arno P, Kiekens C. Reliability of a road test after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;/84:/1792-6.
10. De Raedt R, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Predicting at-fault car accidents of older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2001;/33:/809-19.
11. Tesio L. Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2003;/35:/105-15.
12. Larsson H, Lundberg C, Falkmer T, Johansson K. A survey of occupational therapists' involvement and performance in driving assessment. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;/14:/215-20.
13. Patomella A-H, Johansson K, Tham K. Lived experience of driving ability following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2008; October 1-8 [Epub ahead of print].
14. Patomella A-H, Caneman G, Kottorp A, Tham K. Identifying scale and person response validity of a new assessment of driving ability. Scand J Occup Ther. 2004;/11:/70-7.
15. Patomella A-H, Tham K, Kottorp A. P-Drive: Assessment of driving performance after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2006;/38:/ 273-9.
16. Michon J. A critical view of driver behavioral models: What do we know, what should we do?. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
17. Freund B, Gravenstein S, Ferris R, Shaheen E. Evaluating driving performance of cognitively impaired and healthy older adults: A pilot study comparing on-road and driving simulation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;/50:/1309-15.
18. Lee H, Cameron D, Lee A. Assessing the driving performance of older adult drivers: On-road versus simulated driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2003;/35:/797-803.
19. Linacre JM. Winsteps-Rasch Model computer program. 3.63.0 ed. Chicago: winsteps.com; 2005.
20. Bond T, Fox C. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
21. Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. In: Smith EV, Smith RM, editors. Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and applications. JAM Press; 2004.
22. Linacre JM. Guidelines for rating scales. In: Midwest Objective Measurement Seminar; 1997. Chicago: MESA Research Note #2; 1997.
23. Fisher AG. The assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;/47:/319-29.
24. Wright BD, Linacre JM. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch measurement transactions. 1994;/8:/370.
25. Kottorp A, Bernspång B, Fisher AG. Validity of a performance assessment of activities of daily living for people with developmental disabilities. J Intel Dis Res. 2003;/47:/597-605.
26. Tham K, Bernspång B, Fisher AG. Development of the assessment of awareness of disability. Scand J Occup Ther. 1999;/6:/184-90.
27. Smith E. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;/3(2):/205-31.
28. Linacre JM. Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best? J Outcome Measurement. 1998;/2:/ 266-83.
29. Linacre JM. A users' guide to WINSTEPS, MINISTEPS, Rasch-model computer programs. Program manual 3.68.0. Available at: http://www.winsteps.com/a/ winsteps.pdf [accessed February 20, 2009].
30. Tesio L, Valsecchi MR, Guzzon P, Battaglia MA. Level of activity in profound/severe mental retardation (LAPMER): A Rasch-derived scale of disability. J Appl Meas. 2002;/3:/50-84.
31. Fisher W. Reliability statistics. Rasch measurement transactions. 1992;/6:/238.
32. Wright B, Stone M. Best test design. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1979.
33. Petersen R. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Int Med. 2004;/256:/183-94.
34. Swedish National Road Administration. SFS 1998:1276 Trafikförordning [Traffic rules and regulations]. Swedish Government, Ministry of Finance; 1998.
35. Engelhard G. Examining rater errors in the assessment of written composition with a many-faceted Rasch model. J Educ Meas. 1994;/31:/93-112.