Perceptions of pregnant and postpartum women's feelings about preeclampsia;Percepções e sentimentos de gestantes e puérperas sobre a pré-eclâmpsia

Revista de Salud Publica

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 347-358

  de Azevedo, Daniela Vasconcelos ^a   de Araújo, Ana Cristina Pinheiro Fernandes ^b   Costa, Íris do Céu Clara ^b   Medeiros Júnior, Antônio ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF CEARÁ   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Emotions (source: meSH; NLM); Perception; Preeclampsia; Pregnancy; Prenatal care

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649096659     PISSN: 01240064     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0124-00642009000300004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. National High Blood Pressure Education Program. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 183 Suppl 1: 1-22.
2. Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Preeclampsia. Lancet 2005; 365: 785-99.
3. Beckmann CRB, Ling FW, Herbert WNP, Laube DW, Smith RP, Barzansky BM. Hypertension in pregnancy. In: Obstetrics and gynecology. Williamns & Williamns; 1998; 237-46.
4. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PFA. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006; 367: 1066-74.
5. Richter MS, Parkes C, Chaw-Kant J. Listening to the voices of hospitalized high-risk antepartum patients. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2007; 36: 313-318.
6. Blackford KA, Richardson H, Grieve S. Prenatal education for mothers with disabilities. J. Adv. Nurs. 2000; 32(4): 898-904.
7. Peters RM, Flack JM. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2004; 33(2):209-20.
8. Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Área Técnica de Saúde da Mulher. Pré-natal e puerpério: atenção qualificada e humanizada. Manual Técnico. 2005; Brasil, Brasília. [internet] Disponível em: http://bvsms.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/caderno5_saude_mulher.pdf Consultado em nov 2006.
9. Sousa NL, Araújo ACPF, Azevedo GD, Jerônimo SLB, Barbosa LM, Sousa NML. Percepção materna com o nascimento prematuro e vivência da gravidez com pré-eclâmpsia. Rev. Saude Publica 2007; 41(5): 704-10.
10. Gupton A, Heaman M, Cheung LW. Complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies:women's perception of risk. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2001; 30(2): 192-201.
11. Heaman M, Gupton A.Gregory D. Factors influencing pregnant women's perceptions of risk. MCN: Am. J. Matern. Child Nursing 2004; 29(2):111-16.
12. Leichtentritt RD, Blumenthal N, Elyassi A, Rotmensch S. High-risk pregnancy and hospitalization: the women's voices. Health Soc. Work 2005; 30(1): 39-47.
13. Harrison MJ., Kusher KE, Benzies K, Rempel G, Kimak C. Women's satisfaction with their involvement in health care decisions during a high risk pregnancy. Birth 2003; 30(2): 109-15.
14. Hildingsson I, Radestad I. Swedish women's satisfaction with medical and emotional aspects of antenatal care. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005; 52(3): 239-49.
15. Sword W. Prenatal care use among women of low income: a matter of «taking care of self». Qual. Health Res. 2003; 13(3): 319-13.
16. Gaskell G. Entrevistas individuais e grupais. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G. Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som. 4 ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2005; 64-89.
17. Victora CG, Knauth DR, Hassen MNA. Técnicas de pesquisa. In: Victora CG, Knauth DR, Hassen MNA. Pesquisa qualitativa em saúde - uma introdução em saúde. 1 ed. Porto Alegre; 2000; 61-78.
18. Gadamer HG. Verdade e método. Traços de uma filosofia hermenêutica. 8 ed. Petrópolis: Vozes. São Paulo: Editora Universitária São Francisco; 2007.
19. Phillips B. Nursing care and understanding the experiences of others: a Gadamerian perspective. J. Adv. Nurs. 2007; 14(1): 89-94.
20. Fleming V, Gaidys U, Robb Y. Hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nursing Inquiry 2003;10: 113-120.
21. Geanellos R. Exploring Ricouer's hermeneutic theory of interpretation as a method of analysing research texts. Nursing Inquiry 2002; 7:112-19.
22. Kleinman A. The Illness narratives: suffering, heading and the human condition. New York: Basic Books; 1988.
23. Sakalys JA. The political role of illness narratives. J. Adv. Nurs. 2000; 31(6):1469-75.
24. Hydén LC. Ilness and narrative. Sociology of Health & Ilness. 1997; 19(1): 48-69.
25. Blackford KA, Richardson H, Grieve S. Prenatal education for mothers with disabilities. J. Adv. Nurs. 2000; 32(4), 898-904.
26. Sheppard VB, Zambrana RE, O'Malley A. Provinding health to low-income women: a matter of trust. Fam. Pract 2004; 21: 484-491.
27. García-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, Helse L, Watts C. WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against woman. World Health Organization [internet] Disponível em: http://www.who.int/gender/violence/who_multicountry_study/en/index.html. Consultado em fev 2008.
28. Kottow AR, Kottow MH. The disease-subject as a subject of literature. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. 2007; 2(10) [internet] Disponível em:http://www.peh-med.com/content/2/1/10. Consultado em abr 2008.
29. Gadamer HG. O caráter oculto da saúde. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2006.
30. Black KD. Stress, symptoms, self-monitoring confidence, well-being, and social support in the progression of preeclampsia/gestational hypertension. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2007; 36: 419-29.