Sharks shape the geometry of a selfish seal herd: Experimental evidence from seal decoys

Biology Letters

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 48-50

  De Vos, Alta ^a   O'Riain, M Justin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Cape fur seal; Dilution effect; Grouping; Predator prey interaction; Selfish herd; White shark

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRY; PINNIPED; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SHARK; SURVIVAL;

ANIMALIA; ARCTOCEPHALUS PUSILLUS PUSILLUS; CARCHARODON CARCHARIAS; CHONDRICHTHYES;

EID: 77449143311     PISSN: 17449561     EISSN: 1744957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0628     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Caro, T. 2005 Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. David, J. H. M. & Rand, R. W. 1986 Attendance behaviour of South African fur seals. In Fur seals: maternal strategy on land and at sea (eds G. L. Kooyman & R. L. Gentry), pp. 126-141. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Fitzgibbon, C. 1990 Mixed-species grouping in Thomson's and Grant's gazelles: the antipredator benefits. Anim. Behav. 39, 1116-1126. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80784-5)
4. Foster,W. A. & Treherne, J. E. 1981 Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293, 466-467. (doi:10.1038/293466a0)
5. Hamilton, W. D. 1971 Geometry of the selfish herd. J. Theor. Biol. 31, 295-311. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5)
6. James, R., Bennett, P. G. & Krause, J. 2004 Geometry for mutualistic and selfish herds: the limited domain of danger. J. Theor. Biol. 228, 107-113. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.12.005)
7. Krause, J. 1993 Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups. Biol. Rev. 69, 187-206. (doi:10.1111/j.1469- 185X.1994.tb01505.x)
8. Krause, J. & Ruxton, G. D. 2002 Living in groups. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Laroche, R. K., Kock, A. A., Dill, L. M. & Oosthuizen, W. H. 2008 Running the gauntlet: a predator-prey game between sharks and two age classes of seals. Anim. Behav. 76, 1901-1917. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008. 06.025)
10. Le Boeuf, B. 2004 Hunting and migratory movements of white sharks in the eastern North Pacific. Mem. Natl Inst. Polar Res. 58, 89-100.
11. Milinski, M. 1977 Do all members of a swarm suffer the same predation? Z. Tierpsychol. 45, 373-378.
12. Morton, T. L., Haefner, J. W., Nugala, V., Decino, R. D. & Mendes, L. 1994 The selfish herd revisited: do simple movement rules reduce relative predation risk? J. Theor. Biol. 167, 73-79. (doi:10.1006/jtbi. 1994.1051)
13. Pulliam, H. R. 1973 On the advantages of flocking. J. Theor. Biol. 38, 419-422. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(73)90184-7)
14. Quinn, J. L. & Cresswell, W. 2006 Testing domains of danger in the selfish herd: sparrowhawks target widely spaced redshanks in flocks. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2521-2526. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3612)
15. Rand, R. W. 1967 The Cape fur-seal (Arctocephalus pusillus): general behaviour on land and at sea. Invest. Rep. Div. Sea Fisheries South Africa 60, 1-39.
16. Romey, W. L. & Wallace, A. C. 2007 Sex and the selfish herd: sexual segregation within nonmating whirligig groups. Behav. Ecol. 18, 910-915. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arm057)
17. Stankowich, T. 2003 Marginal predation methodologies and the importance for predator preferences. Anim. Behav. 66, 589-599. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2232)
18. Uetz, L. R. G. 1993 Ontogenetic shifts within the selfish herd: predation risk and foraging trade-offs change with age in colonial web-building spiders. Oecologia 95, 1-8.
19. Viscido, S. V. 2003 The case for the selfish herd hypothesis. Comment. Theor. Biol. 8, 665-684.
20. Viscido, S. V. & Wethey, D. S. 2002 Quantitative analysis of fiddler crab flock movement: evidence for 'selfish herd' behavior. Anim. Behav. 63, 735-741. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1935)