Geometry for mutualistic and selfish herds: The limited domain of danger

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 228, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 107-113

  James, R ^a   Bennett, P G ^a   Krause, J ^b  

^a University of Bath ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aggregation; Limited domains; Selfish herd

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION; GEOMETRY; MUTUALISM; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; GEOMETRY; HAZARD; HERD; NONHUMAN; PREDATION; PREY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; GROUP PROCESSES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 1842424787     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bednekoff P.A., Lima S.L. Re-examining safety in numbers. interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviour Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265:1998;2021-2026.
2. Brock V.E., Riffenburgh R.H. Fish schooling. a possible factor in reducing predation J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 25:1960;307-317.
3. Godin J.-G.J. Evading predators. Godin J.-G.J. Behavioural Ecology of Teleost Fishes. 1997;191-236 Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Hamilton W.D. Geometry for the selfish herd. J. Theor. Biol. 31:1971;295-311.
5. Hamilton W.D. Narrow Roads of Gene Land: The Collected Papers of W.D. Hamilton. Evolution of Social Behaviour:1996;W.H. Freeman, Oxford.
6. Krause J., Ruxton G.D. Living in Groups. 2002;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Krause J., Tegeder R.W. The mechanism of aggregation behaviour in fish shoals. individuals minimise approach time to neighbours Anim. Behav. 48:1994;353-359. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1248).
8. Krause J., Hensor E.M.A., Ruxton G.D. Fish as prey. Hart P.J.B., Reynolds J.D. Handbook of Fish and Fisheries. 2002;Blackwell Science, Oxford.
9. Morton T.L., Haefner J.W., Nugala V., Decino R.D., Mendes L. The selfish herd revisited. do simple movement rules reduce relative predation risk J. Theor. Biol. 167:1994;73-79. (doi:10.1006/jtbi.1994.1051).
10. Neill S.R.St.J., Cullen J.M. Experiments on whether schooling of prey affects hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators. J. Zool. 172:1974;549-569.
11. Okabe A., Boots B.N., Sugihara K. Spatial Tesselations. Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams:1992;Wiley, Chichester.
12. Parker G.A. Evolutionarily stable strategies. Krebs J.R., Davies N.B. Behavioural Ecology. An Evolutionary Approach:1984;30-61 Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
13. Treisman M. Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion. Anim. Behav. 23:1975;779-800.
14. Turner G.F., Pitcher T.J. Attack abatement. a model for group protection by combined avoidance and dilution Am. Nat. 128:1986;228-240.
15. Vine I. Risk of visual detection and pursuit by a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour. J. Theor. Biol. 30:1971;405-422.
16. Viscido S.V., Miller M., Wethey D.S. The dilemma of the selfish herd. the search for a realistic movement rule J. Theor. Biol. 217:2002;183-194. (doi:10.1006/jtbi.2002.3025).