Why is everyone talking about adolescent literacy?

Phi Delta Kappan

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 66-69

  Snow, Catherine ^a   Moje, Elizabeth ^b  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77449106043     PISSN: 00317217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003172171009100616     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bain, Robert B., Annemarie Lander, Marlene Hines, and Gabriela Mercado. "Working Toward a Problem-Centered History Classroom: Using Historical Inquiry and Literacy to Teach American History." Paper presented at the National Council of History Education Annual Conference, Louisville, Ky., April 2008.
2. Beck, Isabel L., and Margaret G. McKeown. "Questioning the Author: Making Sense of Social Studies." Educational Leadership 60, no. 3 (2002): 44-47.
3. Black, Rebecca W. "Language, Culture, and Identity in Online Fanfiction." E-Learning 3, no. 2 (2006): 170-184.
4. Carnegie Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. Time to Act: An Agenda for Advancing Literacy for College and Career Success. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2010
5. Guthrie, John T., and Marcia Davis. "Motivating Struggling Readers in Middle School Through an Engagement Model of Classroom Practice." Reading and Writing Quarterly 19, no. 1 (2003): 59-85.
6. Guthrie, John T., and Alan Wigfield. "Engagement and Motivation in Reading." In Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. III, ed. Michael Kamil, P. David Pearson, and Rebecca Barr, 403-419. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
7. Ivey, Gay. "A Multicase Study in the Middle School: Complexities Among Young Adolescent Readers." Reading Research Quarterly 34, no. 2 (1999): 172-193
8. Kemple, James, William Corrin, Elizabeth Nelson, Terry Salinger, Suzannah Herrmann, and Kathryn Drummond. Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study: Early Impacts and Implementation Findings. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2008
9. Lam, Wan S.E. "L2 Literacy and the Design of the Self: A Case Study of a Teenager Writing on the Internet." Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages 34, no. 3 (2000): 457-482.
10. Lawrence, Joshua, and Catherine E. Snow. "Oral Discourse and Reading." In Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 4, ed. P. David Pearson, Michael Kamil, Elizabeth Moje, and Peter Afflerbach, in press.
11. Leander, Kevin M., and J.F. Lovvorn. "Literacy Networks: Following the Circulation of Texts, Bodies, and Objects in the Schooling and Online Gaming of One Youth." Cognition and Instruction 24, no. 3 (2006): 291-340.
12. McKeown, Margaret G., Isabel L. Beck, and Ronette G.K. Blake. "Rethinking Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Comparison of Instruction for Strategies and Content Approaches." Reading Research Quarterly 44, no. 3 (2009): 218-253
13. Moje, Elizabeth B. "Comprehending in the Content Areas: The Challenges of Comprehension, Grades 7-12, and What to Do About Them." In A Comprehensive Look at Reading Comprehension, K-12, ed. Kathy Ganske and Doug Fisher, 46-72. New York: Guilford, 2010.
14. Moje, Elizabeth B., and Robert B. Bain. Teacher Education for Disciplinary Literacy Learning. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, 2009.
15. Moje, Elizabeth B., Melanie Overby, Nicole Tysvaer, and Karen Morris. "The Complex World of Adolescent Literacy: Myths, Motivations, and Mysteries." Harvard Educational Review 78, no. 1 (2008): 107-154.
16. Moje, Elizabeth B., and Jennifer Speyer. "The Reality of Challenging Texts in High School Science and Social Studies: How Teachers Can Mediate Comprehension." In Best Practices in Adolescent Literacy Instruction, ed. Kathleen Hinchman and Heather Thomas, 185-211. New York: Guilford Press, 2008.
17. National Assessment of Educational Progress. 2007. http://Nationsreportcard.Gov/Reading_2007/R0002.Asp?Tab
18. National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. NIH Pub. No. 00-4769. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000.
19. Palincsar, Annemarie S., and Ann L. Brown. "Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities." Cognition and Instruction 1, no. 2 (1984): 117-175.
20. Pearson, P. David. "Comprehension Matters." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, May 2007.
21. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow. Paris: OECD, 2003.
22. Rand Reading Study Group. Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Model Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 2002.
23. Shultz, Steven. "Legitimizing and Marginalizing: How the Internet Has Shaped Responses to Online Fan Communities and Practices." Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, San Francisco, Cailf., March 2009.
24. Snow, Catherine E., Joshua Lawrence, and Claire White. "Generating Knowledge of Academic Language Among Urban Middle School Students." Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 2, no. 4 (2009): 325-344.
25. Snow, Catherine E., and Paola Uccelli. "The Challenge of Academic Language." In The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, ed. David Olson and Nancy Torrance, 112-132. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
26. Stanovich, Keith E. "Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Reading." Reading Research Quarterly 21, no. 4 (1986): 360-407
27. Stoops, Nicole. Current Population Reports. Educational Attainment in the United States: 2003. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau, 2004.