Optical functional properties of the Boston Keratoprosthesis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 857-863

  Sayegh, Rony R ^a,b   Diaz, Linda Avena ^a   Vargas Martín, Fernando ^b,c   Webb, Robert H ^b   Dohlman, Claes H ^a,b   Peli, Eli ^b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHAKIA; ARTICLE; BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; GLARE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; IRIS; KERATOPROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; ARTIFICIAL ORGAN; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORNEA DISEASE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE REFRACTION; LIGHT; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PROSTHESIS; RADIATION SCATTERING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; GLARE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REFRACTION, OCULAR; SCATTERING, RADIATION; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77449098837     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3372     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ma JJ, Graney JM, Dohlman CH. Repeat penetrating keratoplasty versus the Boston keratoprosthesis in graft failure. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2005;45:49-59.
2. Doane MG, Dohlman CH, Bearse G. Fabrication of a keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 1996;15:179-184.
3. Dohlman CH, Harissi-Dagher M, Graney J. The Boston keratoprosthesis: a new threadless design. Digital J Ophthalmol. 2007:5.
4. Sokol A, Bertelsen TI, Teigland N. The optical function of keratoprostheses. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1977;55:317-332.
5. Rol P, Parel J-M, Lacombe E, Legeais J-M, Villain F. Optics of keratoprostheses. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:212-213.
6. Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB. Results from the multicenter Boston type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113: 1771-1777.
7. Koch DD. Glare and contrast sensitivity testing in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989;15:158-164.
8. Vos JJ. On the cause of disability glare and its dependence on glare angle, age and ocular pigmentation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003; 86:363-370.
9. Aslam TM, Haider D, Murray IJ. Principles of disability glare measurement: an ophthalmological perspective. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:354-360.
10. van den Berg TJ, Ijspeert JK, de Waard PW. Dependence of intraocular straylight on pigmentation and light transmission through the ocular wall. Vision Res. 1991;31:1361-1367.
11. Erie JC, Bandhauer MH. Intraocular lens surfaces and their relationship to postoperative glare. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29: 336-341.
12. Miller D, Dohlman CH. Optical properties of buried corneal silicone prostheses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66:633-640.
13. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the "Activities of Daily Vision Scale": a measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992;30:1111-1126.
14. Holladay JT. Visual acuity measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:287-290.
15. Colenbrander A. Visual acuity measurement standard. Ital J Ophthalmol. 1988;2:1-15.
16. Schein OD, Rosenthal P, Ducharme C. A gas-permeable scleral contact lens for visual rehabilitation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;109: 318-322.
17. Dohlman CH, Dudenhoefer EJ, Khan BF, Morneault S. Protection of the ocular surface after keratoprosthesis surgery: the role of soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 2002;28:72-74.
18. Cardona H. Keratoprostheses: elimination of light reflection from the walls of the optical cylinder. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1966;6: 111-118.