Repeat penetrating keratoplasty versus the Boston keratoprosthesis in graft failure

International Ophthalmology Clinics

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 49-59

  Ma, Joseph J K ^a   Graney, John M ^a   Dohlman, Claes H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; COLLAGEN; COPOLYMER; POLITEF; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYMACON; POLYURETHAN; PROPLAST; QUINOLINE DERIVED ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; TITANIUM; VANCOMYCIN;

DEVICE; ENDOPHTHALMITIS; EYE DISEASE; EYE SURGERY; GLAUCOMA; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOPROSTHESIS; MUCOUS MEMBRANE PEMPHIGOID; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; STEVENS JOHNSON SYNDROME; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

CORNEAL DISEASES; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; REOPERATION;

EID: 27544500562     PISSN: 00208167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.iio.0000176365.71016.28     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, et al. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1855-1865.
2. Williams KA, Ash JK, Pararajasegaram P, et al. Long-term outcome after corneal transplantation. Visual result and patient perception of success. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:651-657.
3. Williams KA, Muehlberg SM, Lewis RF, et al. How successful is corneal transplantation? A report from the Australian Corneal Graft Register. Eye. 1995;9:219-227.
4. Williams KA, Roder D, Esterman A, et al. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:403-414.
5. Bishop VL, Robinson LP, Wechsler AW, et al. Corneal graft survival: a retrospective Australian study. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1986;14:133-138.
6. Epstein RJ, Seedor JA, Dreizen NG, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty for herpes simplex keratitis and keratoconus. Allograft rejection and survival. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:935-944.
7. Price FW Jr, Whitson WE, Marks RG. Graft survival in four common groups of patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:322-328.
8. Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Corneal Endothelium and Postoperative Outcomes Fifteen Years After Penetrating Keratoplasty. ARVO Abstract, Program 4609;2004.
9. Price FW Jr, Whitson WE, Collins KS, et al. Five-year corneal graft survival. A large, single-center patient cohort. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:799-805.
10. Maguire MG, Stark W, Gottsch J. Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies (CTTS). Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1536-1547.
11. Ficker LA, Kirkness CM, Rice NS, et al. The changing management and improved prognosis for corneal grafting in herpes simplex keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:1587-1596.
12. Yamagami S, Suzuki Y, Tsuru T. Risk factors for graft failure in penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74:584-588.
13. Bersudsky V, Blum-Hareuveni T, Rehany U, et al. The profile of repeated corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:461-469.
14. Patel NP, Kim T, Rapuano CJ, et al. Indications for and outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty, 1989-1995. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:719-724.
15. Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, Janarthanan M, et al. Survival analysis and visual outcome in a large series of corneal transplants in India. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:726-731.
16. Liu E, Slomovic AR. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Canada, 1986-1995. Cornea. 1997;16:414-419.
17. Sharif KW, Casey TA. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1971-1990. Eye. 1993;7:485-488.
18. Flowers CW, Chang KY, McLeod SD, et al. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1989-1993. Cornea. 1995;14:583-588.
19. Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, et al. Corneal graft survival and visual outcome. A multicenter study. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:120-127.
20. Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, et al. Conclusions of the corneal transplant follow up study. Collaborating Surgeons. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:631-636.
21. Salzer F. Uber den kunstlichen Hornhautersatz. Wiesbaden: Behrmann; 1898.
22. Dimmer F. Zwei Falle von Celluoidplatten der hornhaut. Klin Monatsbl Augenh. 1891:104.
23. von Hippel A. Eine neue Methode der Hornhauttransplantation. Graefe's Arch f Ophthalmol. 1888:108.
24. Heusser J. Die Einheilung einer Cornea artificialis. Oesterr Ztschr Pract Med. 1860:424.
25. Nussbaum N. Cornea Artificialis, ein substitut fur die Transplantatio Cornea. Deutsche Klinik. 1853:367.
26. Resinger F. Die Keratoplastik, ein Versuch zur Erweiterung der Augenheilkunst. Baiersche Annalen fuer Abhandlungen. 1824:207.
27. Pellier de Quengsy G. Precis ou cours d'operations sur la chirurgie des yeux. Paris: Didot; 1789.
28. Stone W Jr, Herbert E. Experimental study of plastic material and replacement for the cornea: preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953;36:168-173.
29. Barber JC, Feaster F, Priour D. The acceptance of a vitreous carbon alloplastic material, Proplast, in the rabbit eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980;19:182-191.
30. Dorzee J. [Acrylic corneal prosthesis.] Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1955;108:582.
31. Strampelli B. [Osteo-Odontokeratoprosthesis.] Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul. 1963;89:1039.
32. DeVore DP, Stark W, et al. Evaluation of collagen-based corneal grafts in the rabbit model. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993:208.
33. Cardona H, DeVoe AG. Prosthokeratoplasty. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977;83:271-280.
34. Cardona H. Keratoprosthesis; acrylic optical cylinder with supporting intralamellar plate. Am J Ophthalmol. 1962;54:284-294.
35. Roper-Hall M. Success and failures of 1st generation keratoprosthesis-a report on single material PMMA penetrating keratoprosthesis. An Inst Barraquer. 2001:37.
36. Lund O. Die Keratoprosthese, Berichte Deutche Opthalmologische Gesellschaft. Munich: Bergman; 1977.
37. Dohlman CH, Schneider HA, Doane MG. Prosthokeratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;77:694-670.
38. Dohlman CH, Dudenhoefer EJ, Graney JM. Keratoprosthesis: beyond corneal graft failure. In: Spaeth G, ed. Opthalmic Surgery-Principles and Practice, ed 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002.
39. Doane MG, Dohlman CH, Bearse G. Fabrication of a keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 1996;15:179-184.
40. Dohlman C. Postoperative regimen and repair of complications after keratoprosthesis surgery. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993:198.
41. Dohlman CH, Doane MG. Some factors influencing outcome after keratoprosthesis surgery. Cornea. 1994;13:214-218.
42. Dohlman CH, Dudenhoefer EJ, Khan BF, et al. Protection of the ocular surface after keratoprosthesis surgery: the role of soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 2002;28:72-74.
43. Casey TA. Osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis and chondrokeratoprosthesis. Proc R Soc Med. 1970;63:313-314.
44. Donn A. Aphakic bullous keratopathy treated with prosthokeratoplasty. An analysis of 34 consecutive cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976;94:270-273.
45. Buxton JN. Personal experiences. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977;83:268-270.
46. Choyce D. Evolution of Choyce two-piece multistage perforating keratoprosthesis technique in 135 eyes (1967-1980). In: Trevor-Roper, ed. VIth Congress of European Society of Ophthalmology. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1981.
47. Puchkovskaia NA. [Keratoprosthesis as a method of restoring vision in the sequelae of severe corneal lesions.] Oftalmol Zh. 1985;3:132-134.
48. Girard L. Keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 1983:207.
49. Moroz Z. Artificial cornea. In: Fyodorov S, ed. Microsurgery of the Eye, Main Aspects. Moscow: Mir; 1987.
50. Temprano J. Keratoprosthesis with tibial autograft. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993:192.
51. Falcinelli GM, Missiroli A, Pettiti V, et al. Osteo- odontokeratoprosthesis up to date. Acta XXV Concilium Opthalmogicum. Milano: Kugler and Chedini; 1987.
52. Pintucci S, Pintucci F. [Keratoprosthesis with a new haptic support for tissue colonization in dry eyes.] Ophtalmologie. 1988;2:157-160.
53. Marchi V, Ricci R, Pecorella I, et al. Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Description of surgical technique with results in 85 patients. Cornea. 1994;13:125-130.
54. Legeais JM, Renard G, Parel JM, et al. Keratoprosthesis with biocolonizable microporous fluorocarbon haptic. Preliminary results in a 24-patient study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:757-763.
55. Lacombe E. [Results of 30 keratoprostheses with retrocorneal fixation.] J Fr Ophtalmol. 1993;16:426-434.
56. Worst J. Twenty-three years of keratoprosthesis research: present state of art. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993:188.
57. Polack F. Clinical results with ceramic keratoprosthesis. Cornea. 1983:185.
58. Aquavella JV, Rao GN, Brown AC, et al. Keratoprosthesis. Results, complications, and management. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:655-660.
59. Kozarsky AM, Knight SH, Waring GO 3rd. Clinical results with a ceramic keratoprosthesis placed through the eyelid. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:904-911.
60. Singh I. Central and paracentral perforating keratoprosthesis-an experience of 200 cases. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993:191.
61. Mohan MPA. Artificial cornea. In: Cavanagh, ed. The Cornea, vol 3. Transactions of the World Congress on the Cornea. New York: Raven; 1988.
62. Yakimenko S. Results of a PMMA/Titanium keratoprosthesis in 502 eyes. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993:197.
63. Caldwell DR. The soft keratoprosthesis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1997;95:751-802.
64. Crawford GJ, Hicks CR, Lou X, et al. The Chirila Keratoprosthesis: phase I human clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:883-889.
65. Crawford G. 2001.
66. Chirila TVHC, Dalton PD, et al. Artificial cornea. Prog Polym Sci. 1998:447.
67. Hicks C, Crawford G, Chirila T, et al. Development and clinical assessment of an artificial cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:149-170.
68. Hicks CR, Crawford GJ, Tan DT, et al. AlphaCor cases: comparative outcomes. Cornea. 2003;22:583-590.
69. Liu C, Herold J, Sciscio A, et al. Osteon-odonto-keratoprosthesis surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:127.
70. Stoiber JHW, Ruckhofer J, Grabner KW. Visual acuity by Time Index (VAT-Index). ARVO abstract 4178; 2002.
71. Hille KLH, Ruprecht KW. The osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis: surgical management and results. An Inst Barraquer. 2001:65.
72. Yaghouti F, Nouri M, Abad JC, et al. Keratoprosthesis: preoperative prognostic categories. Cornea. 2001;20:19-23.
73. Tugal-Tutkun I, Akova YA, Foster CS. Penetrating keratoplasty in cicatrizing conjunctival diseases. Ophthalmology 1995;102:576-585.
74. Dohlman CH, Ma J. Keratoprosthesis. In: Krachmer, ed. Cornea. Boston: Mosby; 2004.
75. Al-Merjan JSN, Dohlman CH. Temporary tissue coverage in keratoprosthesis. Mid-East J Opthalmol. 2000:12.
76. Nouri M, Terada H, Alfonso EC, et al. Endophthalmitis after keratoprosthesis: incidence, bacterial causes, and risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:484-489.
77. Bath PEMR, Cox KC. Nd:YAG laser discission of retroprosthetic membrane: a preliminary report. Cornea. 1983:225.
78. Ray S, Kahn BF, Dohlman CH, et al. Management of vitreoretinal complications in eyes with permanent keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:559-566.
79. Barraquer J. Proceedings of the second keratoprosthesis study group meeting, Rome, Italy, 1995. An Inst Barraquer. 1999:17.
80. Barraquer J. Proceedings of the third keratoprosthesis study group meeting, Birmingham, England, 1999. An Inst Barraquer. 2001:30.
81. Dohlman CH, Dudenhoefer EJ, Rubin PAD. Can a glaucoma shunt be safely extended to the lacrimal sac or the ethmoid sinuses in keratoprosthesis patients? Preliminary findings. Dig J Opthalmol. 2001:3.