Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization, p57 immunostaining, flow cytometry, and digital image analysis for diagnosing molar and nonmolar products of conception

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 196-204

  Kipp, Benjamin R ^a   Ketterling, Rhett P ^a   Oberg, Trynda N ^a   Cousin, Margot A ^a   Plagge, Amy M ^a   Wiktor, Anne E ^a   Ihrke, Johnita M ^a   Meyers, Cecelia H ^a   Morice, William G ^a   Halling, Kevin C ^a   Clayton, Amy C ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA ploidy; FISH; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Gestational trophoblastic disease; Hydropic abortus; Products of conception

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN P57; CDKN1C PROTEIN, HUMAN; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR 1C;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPLETE HYDATIDIFORM MOLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL IMAGING; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYDATIDIFORM MOLE; HYDROPIC ABORTUS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PARTIAL HYDATIDIFORM MOLE; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; GENETICS; INDUCED ABORTION; MIDDLE AGED; PLOIDY; PREGNANCY;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADULT; CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITOR P57; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; HYDATIDIFORM MOLE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MIDDLE AGED; PLOIDIES; PREGNANCY;

EID: 77449094017     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/AJCPV7BRDUCX0WAQ     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chew SH, Perlman EJ, Williams R, et al. Morphology and DNA content analysis in the evaluation of first trimester placentas for partial hydatidiform mole (PHM). Hum Pathol. 2000;31:914-924.
2. Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ. Tumors of the Uterine Corpus and Gestational Trophoblastic Disease. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1992:290. Atlas of Tumor Pathology; Third Series, Fascicle 3.
3. McConnell TG, Murphy KM, Hafez M, et al. Diagnosis and subclassification of hydatidiform moles using p57 immunohistochemistry and molecular genotyping: validation and prospective analysis in routine and consultation practice settings with development of an algorithmic approach. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:805-817.
4. Seckl MJ, Fisher RA, Salerno G, et al. Choriocarcinoma and partial hydatidiform moles. Lancet. 2000;356:36-39.
5. Soper JT, Mutch DG, Schink JC. Diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease: ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 53. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:575-585. (Pubitemid 38766038)
6. Clement P, Young R. Pathology of trophoblastic disease. In: Roth L, ed. Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions of the Uterine Corpus and Cervix. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:419-447.
7. Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, Halvorson LM, et al. Williams Gynecology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2008.
8. Lindor NM, Ney JA, Gaffey TA, et al. A genetic review of complete and partial hydatidiform moles and nonmolar triploidy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992;67:791-799.
9. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Current management of gestational trophoblastic diseases. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:654-662.
10. Howat AJ, Beck S, Fox H, et al. Can histopathologists reliably diagnose molar pregnancy? J Clin Pathol. 1993;46:599-602. (Pubitemid 23231810)
11. Wells M. The pathology of gestational trophoblastic disease: recent advances. Pathology. 2007;39:88-96. (Pubitemid 46310784)
12. Topalovski M, Hankin RC, Michael C, et al. Ploidy analysis of products of conception by image and flow cytometry with cytogenetic correlation. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103:409-414.
13. Cheville JC, Greiner T, Robinson RA, et al. Ploidy analysis by flow cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in hydropic placentas and gestational trophoblastic disease. Hum Pathol. 1995;26:753-757.
14. Barclay ID, Dabbagh L, Babiak J, et al. DNA analysis (ploidy) of molar pregnancies with image analysis on paraffin tissue sections. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993;100:451-455. (Pubitemid 23296514)
15. Berezowsky J, Zbieranowski I, Demers J, et al. DNA ploidy of hydatidiform moles and nonmolar conceptuses: a study using flow and tissue section image cytometry. Mod Pathol. 1995;8:775-781.
16. Gschwendtner A, Neher A, Kreczy A, et al. DNA ploidy determination of early molar pregnancies by image analysis: comparison to histologic classification. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122:1000-1004. (Pubitemid 28521047)
17. Crisp H, Burton JL, Stewart R, et al. Refining the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole: image ploidy analysis and p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry. Histopathology. 2003;43:363-373. (Pubitemid 37249150)
18. Jun SY, Ro JY, Kim KR. p57kip2 is useful in the classification and differential diagnosis of complete and partial hydatidiform moles. Histopathology. 2003;43:17-25.
19. Merchant SH, Amin MB, Viswanatha DS, et al. p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry in early molar pregnancies: emphasis on its complementary role in the differential diagnosis of hydropic abortuses. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:180-186.
20. Romaguera RL, Rodriguez MM, Bruce JH, et al. Molar gestations and hydropic abortions differentiated by p57 immunostaining. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2004;23:181-190.
21. Williams RA, Charlton IG, Howat AJ. Image analysis DNA densitometry measurements on complete and partial hydatidiform mole and nonmolar products of conception. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14:300-305.
22. Gonchoroff NJ, Ryan JJ, Kimlinger TK, et al. Effect of sonication on paraffin-embedded tissue preparation for DNA flow cytometry. Cytometry. 1990;11:642-646. (Pubitemid 20195437)
23. Wiktor AE, Van Dyke DL, Stupca PJ, et al. Preclinical validation of fluorescence in situ hybridization assays for clinical practice. Genet Med. 2006;8:16-23. (Pubitemid 43756032)
24. Conran RM, Hitchcock CL, Popek EJ, et al. Diagnostic considerations in molar gestations. Hum Pathol. 1993;24:41-48.
25. Sumithran E, Cheah PL, Susil BJ, et al. Problems in the histological assessment of hydatidiform moles: a study on consensus diagnosis and ploidy status by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Pathology. 1996;28:311-315. (Pubitemid 27170917)
26. Fukunaga M, Katabuchi H, Nagasaka T, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:942-947. (Pubitemid 40885018)
27. Lage JM, Driscoll SG, Yavner DL, et al Hydatidiform moles: application of flow cytometry in diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1988;89:596-600.
28. LeGallo RD, Stelow EB, Ramirez NC, et al. Diagnosis of hydatidiform moles using p57 immunohistochemistry and HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:749-755.
29. Bifulco C, Johnson C, Hao L, et al. Genotypic analysis of hydatidiform mole: an accurate and practical method of diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:445-451. (Pubitemid 351398937)