Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland;Profil socjalny kobiet a ich udział w Programie Profilaktyki i Wczesnego Wykrywania Raka Szyjki Macicy w Polsce

Ginekologia Polska

Volumn 80, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 833-838

  Spaczyński, Marek ^a,b   Nowak Markwitz, Ewa ^a,b   Januszek Michalecka, Lucyna ^b   Karowicz Bilińska, Agata ^b,c  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b Centralny O rodek Koordynujacy Program Profilaktyki i Wczesnego Wykrywania Raka Szyjki Macicy   (Poland)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF LODZ   (Poland)

Author keywords

Attendance; Papanicolae smear; Prevention; Uterine cervical neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; POLAND; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; URBAN POPULATION; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; POLAND; QUESTIONNAIRES; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; URBAN POPULATION; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 77449091880     PISSN: 00170011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Forss A, Tishelman C, Widmark C, [et al.]. 'I got a letter...' a qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening program in urban Sweden. Psychooncology. 2001, 10, 76-87.
2. Tacken M, Braspenning J, Hermens R, [et al.]. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization. Eur J Publ Health. 2007, 17, 178-185.
3. Spaczyński M, Michalska M, Januszek- Michalecka L. Centralny Ośrodek Koordynuja{ogonek}cy. Raport z realizacji Populacyjnego programu Profilaktyki i Wczesnego Wykrywania Raka Szyjki Macicy za okres 01.01.2008 do 31.12.2008. Ginekol Pol. 2009, 80,220-226.
4. Eaker S, Adami H, Sparen P. Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population - based study in Sweden. Prev Med. 2001, 32, 482-491.
5. Fylan F Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour. Br J Gen Pract. 1998, 48, 1509-1514.
6. Chew-Graham C, Mole E, Evans L, [et al.]. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006, 61, 381-388.
7. Ackerson K, Preston S. A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009, 65, 1130-1140.
8. Park S, Chang S, Chung C. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening. Public Health Nurs. 2005, 22, 289-298.
9. Rodvall Y, Kemetli L, Tishelman C, [et al.]. Factors related to participation in a cervical cancer screening program in urban Sweden. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005, 14, 459-466.
10. Knapp P, Zbroch T, Knapp P. Zastosowanie interaktywnego przekazywania danych dla wzrostu efektywności program skiringowego. Ginekol Pol. 2004, 75, 896-903.
11. Twinn S, Shiu A, Holroyd E. Women's knowledge about cervical cancer and cervical screening practice: a pilot study of Hong Kong Chinese women. Cancer Nurs. 2002, 25, 377-384.
12. Blomberg K, Ternestedt B, Törnberg S, [et al.]. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision? Psychooncology. 2008, 17, 561-569.
13. Branca M, Rossi E, Cedri S, [et al.]. The STF Project: Female Tumor Screening. Pathologica. 2001, 93, 20-27. Italian.
14. Oscarsson M, Wijma B. 'I do not need to... I do not want to... I do not give it priority...'- why women choose not to attend cervical cancer screening. Health Expect. 2008, 11, 26-34.
15. Espersen M, Holten I. Barriers in screening for cervical cancer. Ugeskr Laeger. 2005, 167, 4371-4374. Danish.
16. Leach C, Schoenberg N. The vicious cycle of inadequate early detection: a complementary study on barriers to cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older women. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007, 4, A95.
17. Sarkadi A, Widmark C, Törnberg S, [et al.]. The 'hows', 'whos', and 'whens' of screening: gynecologists' perspectives on cervical cancer screening in urban Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 2004, 58, 1097-1108.
18. Conway K. Attitudes to Papanicolaou smears. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1996, 17, 189-194.