Barriers in screening for cervical cancer;Barrierer for screening for livmoderhalskræft

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 167, Issue 46, 2005, Pages 4371-4374

  Espersen, Mette Marie ^a   Holten, Iben W ^a  

^a DANISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH CENTER   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DENMARK; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 28244448249     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Cancer Incidens i Danmark 1999. Sundhedsstatistik. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2000.
2. Halkier B. Fokusgrupper. Roskilde: Samfundslitteratur & Roskilde Universitetsforlag 2002; 1-121.
3. Jepson R, Clegg A, Forbes C et al. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Tech Assess 2000;4:1-121.
4. Jeppesen U. Stor risiko eller lille chance. Faktorer, der har betydning, når kvinder vælger mellem deltagelse og ikke-deltagelse i den forebyggende undersøgelse for livmoderhalskræft [ph.d.-afhandl]. Århus: Aarhus Universitet, Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, 2000:1-251.
5. Kvale S. InterView. En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 1997:1-318.
6. Rogers E. Diffusions of innovations. New York, The Free Press, 1995:1-442.
7. Bergmann JB, Sigurdsson JA, Sigurdsson K. What attendance rate can be achieved for Pap smear screening? Scand J Prim Health Care 1996;14:152-8.
8. Campbell H, MacDonald S, McKiernan M. Promotion of cervical screening uptake by health visitor follow-up of women who repeatedly failed to attend. J Pub Health Med 1996;18:94-7.
9. Eaker S, Adami H-O, Sparén P. Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden. Prevent Med 2001;32:482-91.
10. Eaker S, Adami H-O, Granath F et al. A large population-based randomised controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:346-54.
11. Eaker S, Adami H-O, Sparén P. Attitudes to screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden. Cancer Causes Control 2001;12:519-28.
12. Kant AC, Palm BTHM, Wentink E et al. General practitioner based screening for cervical cancer: higher participation of women with a higher risk? J Med Screen 1997;4:35-9.
13. Larsen LPS, Olesen F. Karakteristik af »ikkedeltagere« i organiseret screeningsundersøgelse mod livmoderhalskræft. Ugeskr Læger 1996;158:2987-91.
14. Nielsen M-B. Screening for cervix cancer - karakteristik af deltagere og ikkedeltagere [Master of Pub Health]. Århus: Aarhus Universitet, 1999:1-68.
15. Nathoo V. Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester. BMJ 1988;296:1041-2.
16. Nicoll PM, Narayan KV, Paterson JG. Cervical cancer screening: Women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences. Health Bull 1991;49:184-90.