Optimization of conditions for hydrogen production from brewery wastewater by anaerobic sludge using desirability function approach

Renewable Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1493-1498

  Shi, Xian Yang ^a   Jin, Da Wei ^a   Sun, Qing Ye ^a   Li, Wen Wei ^b  

^a ANHUI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Brewery wastewater; Desirability function; Hydrogen production; Response surface methodology (RSM)

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC SLUDGE; BATCH EXPERIMENTS; BOX-BEHNKEN; BREWERY WASTEWATER; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION APPROACH; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; INFLUENCE FACTORS; MAXIMUM PRODUCTION RATE; PRODUCTION CONDITION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; THREE-LEVEL; VERIFICATION TESTS;

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; GAS PRODUCERS; PH EFFECTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WASTEWATER;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GAS PRODUCTION; HYDROGEN; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; OPTIMIZATION; SLUDGE; WASTEWATER;

EID: 77349101517     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Das D., and Veziroglu T.N. Advances in biological hydrogen production processes. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008) 6046-6057
2. 2 production in glucose fermentation. Environ Sci Technol 42 (2008) 2401-2407
3. Levin D.B., Pitt L., and Love M. Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations to practical application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29 2 (2004) 173-185
4. Li C.L., and Fang H.H.P. Fermentative hydrogen production from wastewater and solid wastes by mixed cultures. Crit Rev Env Sci Technol 37 (2007) 1-39
5. Wang J.L., and Wan W. Effect of temperature on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008) 5392-5397
6. Vazquez I.V., Sparling R., Risbey D., Seijas N.R., and Varaldo H.M.P. Hydrogen generation via anaerobic fermentation of paper mill wastes. Bioresour Technol 96 (2005) 1907-1913
7. 2 production from cellulose containing wastewater. Biotechnol Lett 25 (2003) 365-369
8. Fountoulakis M.S., and Manios T. Enhanced methane and hydrogen production from municipal solid waste and agro-industrial by-products co-digested with crude glycerol. Bioresour Technol 100 (2009) 3043-3047
9. Ginkel S.V., Oh S.E., and Logan B.E. Biohydrogen production from food processing and domestic wastewaters. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30 (2005) 1535-1542
10. Yu H., Zhu Z., Hu W., and Zhang H. Hydrogen production from rice winery wastewater in an uplow anaerobic reactor by mixed anaerobic cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27 (2002) 1359-1365
11. Kapdan I.K., and Kargi F. Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzym Microb Technol 38 (2006) 569-582
12. Janhom T., Wattanachira S., and Pavasant P. Characterization of brewery wastewater with spectrofluorometry analysis. J Environ Manage 90 (2009) 1184-1190
13. Hawkes F.R., Hussy I., Kyazze G., Dinsdale R., and Hawkes D.L. Continuous dark fermentative hydrogen production by mesophilic microflora: principles and progress. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 172-184
14. Wang J.L., and Wan W. Application of desirability function based on neural network for optimizing biohydrogen production process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009) 1253-1259
15. Hu Z.Y., Cai M., and Liang H.H. Desirability function approach for the optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of saikosaponins from Radix Bupluri. Sep Purif Technol 61 (2008) 266-275
16. Oh S., Rheem S., Sim J., Kim S., and Baek Y. Optimizing conditions for the growth of Lactobacillus casei YIT 9018 in tryponse-yeast extract-glucose medium by using response surface methodology. Appl Environ Microbiol 61 (1995) 562-568
17. Mu Y., Wang G., and Yu H.Q. Response surface methodological analysis on biohydrogen production by enriched anaerobic cultures. Enzym Microb Technol 38 (2006) 905-913
18. Wang J.L., and Wan W. Optimization of fermentative hydrogen production process by response surface methodology. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008) 6976-6984
19. Jo J.H., Lee D.S., Park D., Choe W.S., and Park J.M. Optimization of key process variables for enhanced hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes using statistical methods. Bioresour Technol 99 (2008) 2061-2066
20. Kros J.F., and Mastrangelo C.M. Comparing multi-response design methods with mixed responses. Qual Reliab Engng Int 20 (2004) 527-539
21. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. (1995), American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
22. Khuri A.I., and Cornell J.A. Response surface design and analyses (1987), Marcel Dekker Inc, New York
23. Oglekar A.M., and May A.T. Product excellence through design of experiments. Cereal Foods World 32 (1987) 857-868
24. Lay J.J., Lee Y.J., and Noike T. Feasibility of biological hydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Water Res 33 11 (1999) 2579-2586
25. van Ginkel S., Sung S., and Lay J.J. Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environ Sci Technol 35 (2001) 4726-4730
26. Sharma Y., and Li B. Optimizing hydrogen production from organic wastewater treatment in batch reactors through experimental and kinetic analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34 15 (2009) 6171-6180