Demand-side factors in optimal land conservation choice

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 203-221

  Ando, Amy W ^a   Shah, Payal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation; Demand side; Habitat; Optimal reserve site selection; Spatial; Species

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONSTRAINT; CONSERVATION BENEFITS; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DEMAND-SIDE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS; HABITAT; LAND CONSERVATION; MULTIPLE RESERVE; NATURAL CAPITAL; OPTIMAL POLICIES; RESERVE DESIGN; THEORETICAL MODELS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; ECONOMICS; MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PLANNING;

SITE SELECTION;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; OPTIMIZATION; RESERVE DESIGN; SITE SELECTION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 77249151365     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Albers H.J., Ando A.W., and Chen X. A spatial-econometric analysis of attraction and repulsion of private conservation by public reserves. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56 (2008) 33-49
2. Ando A., Camm J., Polasky S., and Solow A. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279 (1998) 2126-2128
3. Ando A. Economies of scope in endangered-species protection: evidence from interest-group behavior. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 4 3 (2001) 312-332
4. Costello C., and Polasky S. Dynamic reserve site selection. Resource and Energy Economics 26 2 (2004) 157-174
5. Hannon B. Sense of place: geographic discounting by people, animals and plants. Ecological Economics 10 2 (1994) 157-174
6. Horan R.D., Shogren J.F., and Gramig B.M. Wildlife conservation payments to address habitat fragmentation and disease risks. Environment and Development Economics 13 (2008) 415-439
7. Kotchen M.J., and Powers S.M. Explaining the appearance and success of voter referenda for open-space conservation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52 1 (2006) 373-390
8. Loomis J.B. Vertically summing public good demand curves: an empirical comparison of economic versus political jurisdictions. Land Economics 76 2 (2000) 312-321
9. Margules C.R., Nicholls A.O., and Pressey R.L. Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43 1 (1988) 4363-4376
10. McCann P. Transport costs and new economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 5 3 (2005) 305-318
11. Nelson E., Uwasu M., and Polasky S. Voting on open space: what explains the appearance and support of municipal-level open space conservation referenda in the United States?. Ecological Economics 62 3-4 (2007) 580-593
12. Önal H., and Yanprechaset P. Site accessibility and prioritization of nature reserves. Ecological Economics 60 4 (2007) 763-773
13. Pate J., and Loomis J.B. The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecological Economics 20 3 (1997) 199-207
14. Ruliffson J.A., Haight R.G., Gobster P.H., and Homans F.R. Metropolitan natural area protection to maximize public access and species representation. Environmental Science and Policy 6 3 (2003) 291-299
15. Sutherland R.J., and Walsh R.G. Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality. Land Economics 61 3 (1985) 281-291
16. Stein B.A., Kutner L.S., and Adams J.S. Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States (2000), Oxford University Press, New York