Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 2568-2573

  Bou Ghosn, Eliver Eid ^a,b   Cassado, Alexandra A ^b   Govoni, Gregory R ^a   Fukuhara, Takeshi ^a   Yang, Yang ^a   Monack, Denise M ^a   Bortoluci, Karina R ^b,c   Almeida, Sandro R ^b   Herzenberg, Leonard A ^a   Herzenberg, Leonore A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

CD11b; F4 80; Lipopolysaccharide; Peritoneal cavity; Thioglycolate

Indexed keywords

CD11B ANTIGEN; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2; NITRIC OXIDE; THIOGLYCOLIC ACID;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MATURATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENDRITIC CELL; IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL; LARGE PERITONEUM MACROPHAGE; LYMPHOID CELL; MONOCYTE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PERITONEUM MACROPHAGE; PHAGOCYTOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMALL PERITONEUM MACROPHAGE;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD11B; ANTIGENS, DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDES; MACROPHAGES, PERITONEAL; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PHAGOCYTOSIS; THIOGLYCOLATES;

ANIMALIA; MUS;

EID: 77249144840     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0915000107     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Taylor PR, Brown GD, Geldhof AB, Martinez-Pomares L, Gordon S (2003) Pattern recognition receptors and differentiation antigens define murine myeloid cell heterogeneity ex vivo. Eur J Immunol 33:2090-2097.
2. Gordon S, Taylor PR (2005) Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol 5:953-964.
3. Taylor PR, et al. (2005) Macrophage receptors and immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol 23:901-944.
4. Cohn ZA (1968) The structure and function of monocytes and macrophages. Adv Immunol 9:163-214.
5. van Furth R (1985) Monocyte production during inflammation. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 8:205-211.
6. Mills CD, Kincaid K, Alt JM, Heilman MJ, Hill AM (2000) M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol 164:6166-6173.
7. Mantovani A, et al. (2004) The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol 25:677-686.
8. Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DR (2003) Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity 19:71-82.
9. Geissmann F, et al. (2008) Blood monocytes: distinct subsets, how they relate to dendritic cells, and their possible roles in the regulation of T-cell responses. Immunol Cell Biol 86:398-408.
10. Steinman RM, Moberg CL (1994) Zanvil Alexander Cohn 1926-1993. J Exp Med 179:1-30.
11. Bogdan C, Schleicher U (2006) Production of interferon-gamma by myeloid cells - fact or fancy? Trends Immunol 27:282-290.
12. Cohn ZA (1978) Activation of mononuclear phagocytes: fact, fancy, and future. J Immunol 121:813-816.
13. Lagasse E, Weissman IL (1996) Flow cytometric identification of murine neutrophils and monocytes. J Immunol Methods 197:139-150.
14. Takahashi M, Galligan C, Tessarollo L, Yoshimura T (2009) Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), not MCP-3, is the primary chemokine required for monocyte recruitment in mouse peritonitis induced with thioglycollate or zymosan A. J Immunol 183:3463-3471.
15. Martinez FO, Helming L, Gordon S (2009) Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol 27:451-483.
16. Auffray C, et al. (2007) Monitoring of blood vessels and tissues by a population of monocytes with patrolling behavior. Science 317:666-670.
17. Kool M, et al. (2008) Alum adjuvant boosts adaptive immunity by inducing uric acid and activating inflammatory dendritic cells. J Exp Med 205:869-882.
18. Roederer M (2001) Spectral compensation for flow cytometry: visualization artifacts, limitations, and caveats. Cytometry 45:194-205.
19. Herzenberg LA, Tung J, Moore WA, Herzenberg LA, Parks DR (2006) Interpreting flow cytometry data: a guide for the perplexed. Nat Immunol 7:681-685.