An analytic solution of the cable equation predicts frequency preference of a passive shunt-end cylindrical cable in response to extracellular oscillating electric fields

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 524-533

  Monai, Hiromu ^a   Omori, Toshiaki ^b,c   Okada, Masato ^b,c   Inoue, Masashi ^d   Miyakawa, Hiroyoshi ^d   Aonishi, Toru ^a,c  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^d TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77249138249     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.041     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bragin, A., G. Jandó, ..., G. Buzsáki. 1995. Gamma (40-100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. J. Neurosci. 15:47-60.
2. Buzsáki, G. 2002. Theta oscillations in the hippocampus. Neuron. 33:325-340.
3. Faber, D. S., and H. Korn. 1989. Electrical field effects: their relevance in central neural networks. Physiol. Rev. 69:821-863.
4. Jefferys, J. G. 1995. Nonsynaptic modulation of neuronal activity in the brain: electric currents and extracellular ions. Physiol. Rev. 75:689-723.
5. Anderson, T., B.Hu,., Z.H. Kiss. 2004.Mechanismsof deep brain stimulation: an intracellular study in rat thalamus. J. Physiol. 559:301-313.
6. Kringelbach, M. L., N. Jenkinson, ., T. Z. Aziz. 2007. Translational principles of deep brain stimulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8:623-635.
7. Cartee, L. A., and R. Plonsey. 1992. The transient subthreshold response of spherical and cylindrical cell models to extracellular stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:76-85.
8. Costalat, R., and B. Delord. 1999. Ephaptic interactions between neurons. In Modeling in the Neurosciences: From Ionic Channels to Neural Networks. R. R. Poznanski, editor. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 321-355.
9. Klee, M. 1973. Intracellular biopotentials during static extracellular stimulation. Biophys. J. 13:822-831.
10. Krassowska, W., and J. C. Neu. 1994. Response of a single cell to an external electric field. Biophys. J. 66:1768-1776.
11. McIntyre, C. C., and W. M. Grill. 2002. Extracellular stimulation of central neurons: influence of stimulus waveform and frequency on neuronal output. J. Neurophysiol. 88:1592-1604.
12. McIntyre, C. C., W. M. Grill,., N. V. Thakor. 2004. Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. J. Neurophysiol. 91:1457-1469.
13. Rattay, F. 1999. The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience. 89:335-346.
14. Svirskis, G., A. Gutman, and J. Hounsgaard. 1997. Detection of a membrane shunt by DC field polarization during intracellular and whole cell recording. J. Neurophysiol. 77:579-586.
15. Tranchina, D., and C. Nicholson. 1986. A model for the polarization of neurons by extrinsically applied electric fields. Biophys. J. 50:1139-1156.
16. Plonsey, R., and R. C. Barr. 1998. Electric field stimulation of excitable tissue. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 17:130-137.
17. 2+ currents in apical dendrites. Hippocampus. 6:79-95.
18. h, on the electrotonic properties of the distal apical dendrites of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurones. Brain Res. 930:42-52.
19. Bikson, M., M. Inoue,., J. G. Jefferys. 2004. Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. J. Physiol. 557:175-190.
20. Jackson, M. B. 1992. Cable analysis with the whole-cell patch clamp. Theory and experiment. Biophys. J. 61:756-766.
21. Johnston, D. 1981. Passive cable properties of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 1:41-55.
22. Major, G., A. U. Larkman, ., J. J. Jack. 1994. Detailed passive cable models of whole-cell recorded CA3 pyramidal neurons in rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurosci. 14:4613-4638.
23. Turner, D. A., and P. A. Schwartzkroin. 1980. Steady-state electrotonic analysis of intracellularly stained hippocampal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 44:184-199.
24. Golding, N. L., T. J. Mickus, ., N. Spruston. 2005. Factors mediating powerful voltage attenuation along CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites. J. Physiol. 568:69-82.
25. Inoue, M., Y. Hashimoto,., H. Miyakawa. 2001. Dendritic attenuation of synaptic potentials in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices detected with an optical method. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13:1711-1721.
26. Omori, T., T. Aonishi, ., M. Okada. 2006. Estimated distribution of specific membrane resistance in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neuron. Brain Res. 1125:199-208.
27. Stuart, G., and N. Spruston. 1998. Determinants of voltage attenuation in neocortical pyramidal neuron dendrites. J. Neurosci. 18:3501-3510.
28. Narayanan, R., and D. Johnston. 2007. Long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal neurons is accompanied by spatially widespread changes in intrinsic oscillatory dynamics and excitability. Neuron. 56:1061-1075.
29. + current in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. J. Physiol. 545:783-805.
30. Ulrich, D. 2002. Dendritic resonance in rat neocortical pyramidal cells. J. Neurophysiol. 87:2753-2759.
31. Hutcheon, B., and Y. Yarom. 2000. Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons. TrendsNeurosci. 23:216-222.
32. Hutcheon, B., R. M. Miura, ., E. Puil. 1994. Low-threshold calcium current and resonance in thalamic neurons: a model of frequency preference. J. Neurophysiol. 71:583-594.
33. Rall, W. 1959. Branching dendritic trees and motor-neuron membrane resistivity. Exp. Neurol. 1:491-527.
34. Kawato, M. 1984. Cable properties of a neuron model with non-uniform membrane resistivity. J. Theor. Biol. 111:149-169.
35. Durand, D. 1984. The somatic shunt cable model for neurons. Biophys. J. 46:645-653.
36. Morse, P. M., and H. Feshbach. 1953. Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part I, Reprint Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
37. Jack, J. J. B., D. Noble, and R. W. Tsien. 1983. Electric Current Flow in Excitable Cells. Oxford University Press, New York.
38. Tuckwell, H. C. 1988. Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology: Vol. 1, Linear Cable Theory and Dendritic Structure (Cambridge Studies in Mathematical Biology). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. Koch, C. 1998. Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons, 1st Ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
40. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, and B. P. Flannery. 2007. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
41. Spruston, N., and D. Johnston. 1992. Perforated patch-clamp analysis of the passive membrane properties of three classes of hippocampal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 67:508-529.
42. Bekkers, J. M., and C. F. Stevens. 1996. Cable properties of cultured hippocampal neurons determined from sucrose-evoked miniature EPSCs. J. Neurophysiol. 75:1250-1255.
43. London, M., C. Meunier, and I. Segev. 1999. Signal transfer in passive dendrites with nonuniform membrane conductance. J. Neurosci. 19:8219-8233.
44. Omori, T., T. Aonishi, and M. Okada. 2009. Steep decrease in the specific membrane resistance in the apical dendrites of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Neurosci. Res. 64:83-95.