Exploring homeowner opposition to public housing developments

Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 49-74

  Duke, Joanna ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Housing; Mobility; Nimby ism

Indexed keywords

EID: 77249125828     PISSN: 01915096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.
2. Anderson, W. (2004). Colorblind segregation: Equal protection as a bar to neighborhood integration. California Law Review, 93 (3), 843-884.
3. Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
4. Berlin, I. (1962). Four essays on liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Blank, R. B., Dabady, M., & Citro, C. F. (Eds.) (2004). Measuring racial discrimination. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
6. Bobo, L., & Zubrinsky, C. L. (1996). Attitudes on residential integration: Perceived status differences, mere in-group preference, or racial prejudice? Social Forces, 74, 999-1025.
7. Briggs, X., Darden, J. T., & Aidala, A. (1999). In the wake of desegregation: Early impacts of scattered-site public housing on neighborhoods in Yonkers, New York. Journal of American Planning Association, 65 (1), 27-49.
8. Brophy, P. C. & Smith, R. N. (1997). Mixed-income housing: Factors for success. Cityscape, 3 (2), 3-31.
9. Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57 (2), 207-227.
10. Dawkins, C. J. (2004). Recent evidence on the continuing causes of black-white residential segregation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26 (3), 379-400.
11. Duke, J. (2009). Mixed income housing policy and public housing residents' 'right to the city.' Critical Social Policy, 29 (1), 100-120.
12. Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8 (4), 833-866.
13. Farley, R., Schuman, H., Bianchi, S., Colasanto, D., & Hatchett, S. (1978). Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs: Will the trend toward racially separate communities continue? Social Science Research, 7, 19-344.
14. Galster, G., R. S., Santiago, A., & Pettit, K. (2003). Why not in my backyard?: Neighborhood impacts of deconcentrating assisted housing. Center for Urban Policy Research.
15. Goering, J., & Feins, J. D. (Eds). (2003). Choosing a better life? Evaluating the moving to opportunity social experiment. Washington, D. C.: Urban Institute Press, 37-57.
16. Goetz, E. G. (2003). Clearing the way: Deconcentrating the poor in urban America. Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute Press.
17. Ihlanfieldt, K., & Scafdi, B. (2004). Whites' neighbourhood racial peferences and neighbourhood racial composition in the United States: Evidence from the multi-city study of urban inequality. Housing Studies, 19 (3), 325-359.
18. Innovative Housing Institute. (1998). The house next door. Retrieved from http://www.inhousing.org/.
19. Jenks, C., & Meyer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner city poverty in the United States (pp. 111-186). Washington DC: National Academy Press.
20. Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI new communities: Neighborhood relationships in mixed-income housing. Environment and Planning A, 37 (8), 1413-1441.
21. Kleit, R. G. (2001). Neighborhood relations in suburban scattered - site and clustered public housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23 (3-4), 409-430.
22. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Trans. & Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
23. Lipsitz, G. (1998). The possessive investment in whiteness: How white people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
24. Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the American underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Mill, J. S. (1879). On liberty. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Popkin, S. J., Buron, L. F., Levy, D. K., & Cunningham, M. K. (2000). The Gautreaux legacy: What might mixed-income and dispersal strategies mean for the poorest public housing tenants? Housing Policy Debate, 11 (4), 911-942.
28. Purcell, M. (2001). Neighborhood activism among homeowners as a politics of space. Professional Geographer, 53 (2), 178-194.
29. Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27 (3), 564-590.
30. Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
31. Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (rev. ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
32. Talen, E. (2006). Design for diversity: Evaluating the context of socially mixed neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Design, 11 (1), 1-32.
33. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantag Ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34. Wittig, M. A., & Grant-Thompson, S. (1998). The utility of Allport's conditions of intergroup contact for predicting perceptions of improved racial attitudes and beliefs. Journal of Social Issues, 54 (4), 795-812.
35. Yinger, J. (1986). On the possibility of achieving racial integration through subsidized housing. In J. M. Goering (Ed.), Housing desegregation and federal policy (pp. 290-312). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.