A review of repeat prostate biopsies and the influence of technique on cancer detection: Our experience

Irish Journal of Medical Science

Volumn 178, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 287-290

  Quinlan, M R ^a   Casey, R G ^a,b   Flynn, R ^a   Grainger, R ^a   McDermott, T E D ^a   Thornhill, J A ^a  

^a ADELAIDE AND MEATH HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b ST JAMES S HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Cancer; Cores; Prostate; TRUS

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; PROSTATITIS; REPEAT PROCEDURE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; BIOPSY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE;

EID: 77249125299     PISSN: 00211265     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-009-0362-0     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Park SJ, Miyake H, Hara I, Eto H (2003) Predictors of prostate cancer on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Int J Urol 10(2):68-81. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2042.2003. 00579.x
2. Arcangeli CG, Ornstein DK, Keetch DW, Andriole GL (1997) Prostate-specific antigen as a screening test for prostate cancer. The United States experience. Urol Clin North Am 24(2):299-306. doi:10.1016/S0094-0143(05) 70376-1 (Pubitemid 27169254)
3. Yuen JS, Lau WK, Ng LG, Tan PH, Khin LW, Cheng CW (2004) Clinical, biochemical and pathological features of initial and repeat transrectal ultrasonography prostate biopsy positive patients. Int J Urol 11(4):225-231. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042. 2003.00772.x
4. Mariappan P, Chong WL, Sundran M, Mohamed SR (2004) Increasing prostate biopsy cores based on volume vs the sextant biopsy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical study on cancer detection rates and morbidity. BJU Int 94(3):307-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04928.x (Pubitemid 39120169)
5. Fink KG, Hutarew G, Pytel A et al (2003) One 10-core prostate biopsy is superior to two sets of sextant prostate biopsies. BJU Int 92(4):385-388. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04350.x (Pubitemid 37100515)
6. DjaVan B, Renzi M, Schulman CC, Marberger M, Zlotta AR (2002) Repeat prostate biopsy: who, how and when? A review. Eur Urol 42(2):93-103. doi:10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00256-7 (Pubitemid 34887520)
7. Pryor MB, Schellhammer PF (2002) The pursuit of prostate cancer in patients with a rising prostate specific antigen and multiple negative transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. Clin Prostate Cancer 1(3):172-176
8. DjaVan B, Milani S, Remzi M (2005) Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update. Can J Urol 12(Suppl 1):44-48 (discussion 99-100)
9. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL (1997) Systematic 5-region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 157(1):199-202 (discussion 202-203). doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65322-9
10. DjaVan B, Mazal P, Zlotta A et al (2001) Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection Study. Prostate 47(2):111-117. doi:10.1002/pros.105311. (Pubitemid 32336580)
11. Puppo P, Introini C, Calvi P, Naselli A (2006) Role of transurethral resection of the prostate and biopsy of the peripheral zone in the same session after repeated negative biopsies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 49(5):873-878. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.064
12. Applewhite JC, Matlaga BR, McCullough DL (2002) Results of the 5 region prostate biopsy method: the repeat biopsy population. J Urol 168(2):500-503. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64667-8
13. Arzoz Fabergas M, Areal Calama J, Ibarz Servio L, Gago Ramos JL, Boix Orri R, Saladie Roig JM (2005) Isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and positive prostate cancer results at repeat biopsy. Our series review. Actas Urol Esp 29(8):735-738