Weaving variability into domain metamodels

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5795 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 690-705

  Morin, Brice ^a   Perrouin, Gilles ^b   Lahire, Philippe ^c   Barais, Olivier ^a,d   Vanwormhoudt, Gilles ^e   Jézéquel, Jean Marc ^a,d  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

^c I3S Nice Sophia Antipolis   (Guadeloupe)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^e UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPECT ORIENTED MODELING; COMMON-BASE; DOMAIN METAMODELS; DOMAIN-SPECIFIC MODELING LANGUAGE; LEARNING CURVES; META MODEL; PRODUCT LINE ENGINEERING; PRODUCT-LINES;

LINGUISTICS; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; QUERY LANGUAGES; WEAVING;

MODELS;

EID: 77249123516     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04425-0_56     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Secaucus (2005)
2. Perrouin, G., Klein, J., Guelfi, N., Jézéquel, J.M.: Reconciling automation and flex-ibility in product derivation. In: 12th International Software Product Line Confer-ence (SPLC 2008), Limerick, Ireland, pp. 339-348. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)
3. OMG: OMG Unified Modeling Language OMG UML, Superstructure Version 2.2. Technical Report formal/2007-02-03, Object Management Group (2007)
4. Lahire, P., Morin, B., Vanwormhoudt, G., Gaignard, A., Barais, O., Jézéquel, J.M.: Introducing variability into aspect-oriented modeling approaches. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 498-513. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
5. Gray, J., Sztipanovits, J., Schmidt, D.C., Bapty, T., Neema, S., Gokhale, A.: Two-level aspect weaving to support evolution in model-driven synthesis, pp. 681-709. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)
6. Schobbens, P.-Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.-C., Bontemps, Y.: Feature Diagrams: A Survey and A Formal Semantics. In: RE, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (2006)
7. Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.C., Bontemps, Y.: Generic semantics of feature diagrams. Computer Networks 51, 456-479 (2007)
8. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, S.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Soft-ware Engineering Institute (1990)
9. Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S., Eisenecker, U.: Formalizing Cardinality-based Feature Models and their Specialization. Software Process Improvement and Practice 10, 7-29 (2005)
10. Griss, M.L., Favaro, J., d' Alessandro, M.: Integrating Feature Modeling with the RSEB. In: ICSR, Washington, DC, USA (1998)
11. Kang, K.C., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K., Shin, E., Huh, M.: FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain-Specific Reference Architectures. Ann. Softw. Eng. 5, 143-168 (1998)
12. Haugen, O., Moller-Pedersen, B., Oldevik, J., Olsen, G.K., Svendsen, A.: Adding standardized variability to domain specific languages. In: Software Product Line Conference, pp. 139-148 (2008)
13. Ramos, R., Barais, O., Jézéquel, J.M.: Matching model-snippets. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
14. Batory, D.S.: Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas. In: Obbink, H., Pohl, K. (eds.) SPLC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3714, pp. 7-20. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
15. PureSystems. Pure:: Variants Website (2006), http://www.pure-systems.com/
16. Czarnecki, K., Antkiewicz, M.: Mapping Features to Models: A Template Approach based on Superimposed Variants. In: Glück, R., Lowry, M. (eds.) GPCE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3676, pp. 422-437. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
17. Benavides, D., Segura, S., Trinidad, P., Ruiz-Cortes, A.: FAMA: Tooling a frame-work for the automated analysis of feature models. In: Proceeding of the First International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems (VAMOS), pp. 129-134 (2007)
18. Metzger, A., Pohl, K., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.-Y., Saval, G.: Disambiguat-ing the documentation of variability in software product lines: A separation of concerns, formalization and automated analysis. In: IEEE Conference on Require-ments Engineering, pp. 243-253. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)
19. Muller, P-A., Fleurey, F., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Weaving executability into object-oriented meta-languages. In: Briand, L.C., Williams, C. (eds.) MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 264-278. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
20. Ziadi, T., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Product Line Engineering with the UML: Deriving Prod-ucts. In: Families Research Book. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
21. Voelter, M., Groher, I.: Product line implementation using aspect-oriented and model-driven software development. In: 11th International Software Product Line Conference, Kyoto, Japan, p. 10 (2007)