Reconciling automation and flexibility in product derivation

Proceedings - 12th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 339-348

  Perrouin, Gilles ^a   Klein, Jacques ^a   Guelfi, Nicolas ^a   Jézéquel, Jean Marc ^a   Team, Triskell ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED SUPPORTS; CORE ASSETS; GENERIC FEATURES; INTEGRATED PRODUCTS; METAMODELING ENVIRONMENTS; METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES; ONE HANDED; PRODUCT DERIVATIONS; PRODUCT LINES; RELATED PRODUCTS; SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS; YIELDING;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 55049092059     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SPLC.2008.38     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. M. Antkiewicz and K. Czarnecki. Featureplugin: feature modeling plug-in for eclipse. In OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology eXchange, pages 67-72, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
2. C. Atkinson, J. Bayer, C. Bunse, E. Kamsties, O. Laitenberger, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, B. Paech, J. Wüst, and J. Zettel. Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA, 2002.
3. C. Atkinson, J. Bayer, and D. Muthig. Component-based Product Line Development: the KobrA approach. In SPLC, pages 289-309, Norwell, MA, USA, 2000. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. BigLever. GEARS Website http://www.biglever.com/index.html, 2006.
5. F. Budinsky, D. Steinberg, E. Merks, R. Ellersick, and T. Grose. Eclipse Modeling Framework. The Eclipse Series. Addison Wesley Professional., 2003.
6. K. Czarnecki and M. Antkiewicz. Mapping Features to Models: A Template Approach based on Superimposed Variants. In Generative programming and component engineering (GPCE), volume 3676 of LNCS, pages 422-437. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
7. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, and U. Eisenecker. Formalizing Cardinality-based Feature Models and their Specialization. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 10(1):7-29, 2005.
8. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, and U. Eisenecker. Staged Configuration through Specialization and Multilevel Configuration of Feature Models. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 10(2): 143-169, 2005.
9. K. Czarnecki and K. Pietroszek. Verifying feature-based model templates against well-formedness ocl constraints. In GPCE, pages 211-220, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
10. S. Deelstra, M. Sinnema, and J. Bosch. Experiences in Software Product Families: Problems and Issues during Product Derivation. In SPLC, pages 165-182, September 2004.
11. S. Deelstra, M. Sinnema, and J. Bosch. Product derivation in software product families: a case study. J. Syst. Softw., 74(2):173-194, 2005.
12. F. Fleurey, B. Baudry, R. France, and S. Ghosh. A generic approach for automatic model composition. In Workshop on Aspect-Oriented Modeling at Models'07, 2007.
13. R. France, F. Fleurey, R. Reddy, B. Baudry, and S. Ghosh. Providing support for model composition in metamodels. In EDOC, Annapolis, MD, USA, 2007.
14. R. France, I. Ray, G. Georg, and S. Ghosh. Aspect-oriented approach to early design modelling. IEE Proceedings Software, pages 173-185, August 2004.
15. M. L. Griss, J. Favaro, and M. d' Alessandro. Integrating Feature Modeling with the RSEB. In ICSR, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
16. N. Guelfi and G. Perrouin. Coherent Integration of Variability Mechanisms at the Requirements Elicitation and Analysis Levels. In D. Muthig and P. Clements, editors, Workshop on Managing Variability for SPL, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2006.
17. N. Guelfi and G. Perrouin. A flexible requirements analysis approach for software product lines. In REFSQ, LNCS- 4542, pages 78-92, Norway, 2007. Springer-Verlag.
18. Ø. Haugen, B. Møller-Pedersen, J. Oldevik, and A. Solberg. An MDA-based Framework for Model-Driven Product Derivation. In SEA, pages 709-714. ACTA Press, 2004.
19. L. Hotz, K. Wolter, T. Krebs, S. Deelstra, M. Sinnema, J. Nijhuis, and J. MacGregor. Configuration in Industrial Product Families, The ConIPF Methodology. IOS Press, 2006.
20. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and S. Peterson. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Nov. 1990.
21. K. C. Kang, S. Kim, J. Lee, K. Kim, E. Shin, and M. Huh. FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain- Specific Reference Architectures. Ann. Softw. Eng., 5:143-168, 1998.
22. S. Kent. Model Driven Engineering. In IFM, pages 286-298, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
23. S. D. Kim, H. G. Min, J. S. Her, and S. H. Chang. DREAM: A Practical Product Line Engineering Using Model Driven Architecture. In Information Technology and Applications (ICITA), pages 70-75, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
24. J. Klein, F. Fleurey, and J. M. Jézéquel. Weaving multiple aspects in sequence diagrams. Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development (TAOSD)., LNCS 4620:167-199, 2007.
25. J. Klein, L. Hélouet, and J.-M. Jézéquel. Semantic-based weaving of scenarios. In Aspect-Oriented Software Development (AOSD), Bonn, Germany, 2006. ACM.
26. C. W. Krueger. Easing the Transition to Software Mass Customization. In Workshop on Software Product-Family Engineering (PFE), pages 282-293, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
27. C. W. Krueger. New Methods in Software Product Line Development. In SPLC, pages 95-102. IEEE, 2006.
28. P.-A. Muller, F. Fleurey, and J.-M. Jézéquel. Weaving executability into object-oriented meta-languages. In Proc. of MODELS/UML'2005, LNCS, Jamaica, 2005. Springer.
29. P.-A. Muller, F. Fleurey, D. Vojtisek, Z. Drey, D. Pollet, F. Fondement, P. Studer, and J.-M. Jézéquel. On executable meta-languages applied to model transformations. In Model Transformations In Practice Workshop (MTIP), Jamaica, 2005.
30. OMG. UML 2.0 OCL 2.0 specification. Technical Report ptc/05-06-06, Object Management Group, June 2005.
31. OMG. Meta object facility (mof) core specification. Technical Report 06-01-01, OMG, January 2006.
32. G. Perrouin. Architecting Software Systems using Model Transformation and Architectural Frameworks. PhD thesis, FSTC, Université du Luxembourg, and Institut d'Informatique, Université de Namur, Sept 2007.
33. K. Pohl, G. Böckle, and F. J. van der Linden. Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2005.
34. N. Pontisso and D. Chemouil. Topcased combining formal methods with model-driven engineering. In International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), pages 359-360, Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
35. PureSystems. Pure::Variants Website http://www.pure-systems.com/, 2006.
36. R. Reddy, R. France, S. Ghosh, F. Fleurey, and B. Baudry. Model composition - a signature-based approach. In AOM Workshop, Montego Bay, Oct. 2005.
37. R. Reddy, S. Ghosh, R. B. France, G. Straw, J. M. Bieman, E. Song, and G. Georg. Directives for composing aspectoriented design class models. Transactions on Aspect- Oriented Software Development (TAOSD), LNCS 3880:75-105, 2006.
38. P.-Y. Schobbens, P. Heymans, J.-C. Trigaux, and Y Bontemps. Feature Diagrams: A Survey and A Formal Semantics. In RE, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2006.
39. P.-Y. Schobbens, P. Heymans, J.-C. Trigaux, and Y Bontemps. Generic semantics of feature diagrams. Computer Networks, 51(2):456-479, 2007.
40. R. Soley and OMG. Model Driven Architecture. Technical Report omg/00-11-05, OMG, November 2000.
41. M. Voelter and I. Groher. Product line implementation using aspect-oriented and model-driven software development. In SPLC, pages 233-242, Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
42. J. Withey. Investment analysis of software assets for product lines. Technical Report CMU/SEI-96-TR-010, ADA 315653, Software Engineering Institute, 1996.
43. T. Ziadi, L. Hélouët, and J.-M. Jézéquel. Towards a UML Profile for Software Product Lines. In Product-Family Engineering (PFE), volume 3014 of LNCS, pages 129-139, Siena, Italy, November 2003. Springer.
44. T. Ziadi and J.-M. Jézéquel. Product Line Engineering with the UML: Deriving Products. In Families Research Book. Springer, 2006.