Epaulet color and sexual selection in the Red-winged blackbird: A field experiment

Condor

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 740-751

  Yasukawa, Ken ^a   Enstrom, David A ^b   Parker, Patricia G ^c,d   Jones, Thomas C ^c,e  

^a BELOIT COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^e EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agelaius phoeniceus; Extra pair paternity; Intersexual selection; Intrasexual selection; Realized reproductive success; Red winged Blackbird; Within pair paternity

Indexed keywords

AGELAIUS; AGELAIUS PHOENICEUS;

EID: 77249118830     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/cond.2009.090058     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. ANDERSSON, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. ANDERSSON, S., S. R. PRYKE, J. ORNBORG, M. J. LAWES, AND M. ANDERSSON. 2002. Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird. American Naturalist 160:683-691.
3. ARNOLD, S. J., AND M. J. WADE. 1984. ON the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. EVOLUTION 38:720-734.
4. BADYAEV, A. V., AND T. E. MARTIN. 2000. Sexual dimorphism in relation to current selection in the House Finch. Evolution 54:987-997.
5. BELETSKY, L. 1996. The Red-winged Blackbird: the biology of a strongly polygynous songbird. Academic Press, London.
6. BORGIA, G. 1995. Complex male display and female choice in the Spotted Bowerbird: specialized functions for different bower decorations. Animal Behaviour 49:1291-1301.
7. BORGIA, G., AND U. MUELLER. 1992. Bower destruction, decoration stealing and female choice in the Spotted Bowerbird Chlamydera maculata. Emu 92:11-18.
8. BURTON, N., AND K. YASUKAWA. 2001. The "predator early warning system" of Red-winged Blackbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 72:106-112.
9. CHENOWETH, S. E., H. D. RUNDLE, AND M. W. BLOWS. 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. American Naturalist 171:22-34.
10. DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species. John Murray, London.
11. DARWIN, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
12. DUFOUR, K. W., AND P. J. WEATHERHEAD. 1998. Reproductive consequences of bilateral symmetry for individual male Red-winged Blackbirds. Behavioral Ecology 9:232-242.
13. ECKERT, C. G., AND P. J. WEATHERHEAD. 1987. Male characteristics, parental quality and the study of mate choice in the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20:35-42.
14. GIBBS, H. L., P. J. WEATHERHEAD, P. T. BOAG, B. N. WHITE, L. M. TABAK, AND D. J. HOYSAK. 1990. Realized reproductive success of polygynous male Red-winged Blackbirds revealed by DNA markers. Science 250:1394-1397.
15. GRAFEN, A. 1988. On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success, p. 454-471. In T. H. Clutton-Brock [ED.], Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. GRAY, E. M. 1996. Female control of offspring paternity in a western population of Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38:267-278.
17. HANSEN, A. J., AND S. ROHWER. 1986. Coverable badges and resource defense in birds. Animal Behaviour 34:69-76.
18. HILL, G. E. 2002. A red bird in a brown bag: the function and evolution of colorful plumage in the House Finch. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
19. HOLM, C. H. 1973. Breeding sex ratios, territoriality, and reproductive success in the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 54:356-365.
20. JAWOR, J. M., S. U. LINVILLE, S. M. BEALL, AND R. BREITWISCH. 2003. Assortative mating by multiple ornaments in Northern Cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis). Behavioral Ecology 14:515-520.
21. JEFFREYS, A. J., N. J. ROYLE, V. WILSON, AND Z. WONG. 1988. Spontaneous mutation rates to new length alleles at tandem-repetitive hypervariable loci in human DNA. Nature 332:278-281.
22. JOHNSON, K. P., AND S. M. LANYON. 2000. Evolutionary changes in color patches of blackbirds are associated with marsh nesting. Behavioral Ecology 11:515-519.
23. KINGSOLVER, J. G., AND D. W. SCHEMSKE. 1991. Path analyses of selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:276-280.
24. KNIGHT, R. L., AND S. A. TEMPLE. 1988. Nest-defense behavior in the Red-winged Blackbird. Condor 90:193-200.
25. MADDEN, J. R. 2002. Bower decorations attract females but provoke other male Spotted Bowerbirds: bower owners resolve this tradeoff. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1347-1351.
26. MADDEN, J. R. 2003a. Bower decorations are good predictors of mating success in the Spotted Bowerbird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53:269-277.
27. MADDEN, J. R. 2003b. Male Spotted Bowerbirds preferentially choose, arrange and proffer objects that are good predictors of mating success. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53:263-268.
28. MCGRAW, K. J., K. WAKAMATSU, A. B. CLARK, AND K. YASUKAWA. 2004. Red-winged Blackbirds Agelaius phoeniceus use carotenoid and melanin pigments to color their epaulets. Journal of Avian Biology 35:543-550.
29. METZ, K. J., AND P. J. WEATHERHEAD. 1991. Color bands function as secondary sexual traits in male Red-winged Blackbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28:23-27.
30. METZ, K. J., AND P. J. WEATHERHEAD. 1992. Seeing red: uncovering coverable badges in Red-winged Blackbirds. Animal Behaviour 43:223-229.
31. METZ, K. J., AND P. J. WEATHERHEAD. 1993. An experimental test of the contrasting-color hypothesis for red-band effects in Redwinged Blackbirds. Condor 95:395-400.
32. MØLLER, A. P., AND A. POMIANKOWSKI. 1993. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32:167-176.
33. MONTGOMERIE, R. 2006. Analyzing colors, p. 90-147. In G. E. HILL AND K. J. MCGRAW [EDS.], Bird coloration: mechanisms and measurements, volume 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. MORRIS, L. 1975. Effect of blackened epaulets on the territorial behavior and breeding success of male Red-winged Blackbirds, Agelaius phoeniceus. Ohio Journal of Science 75:168-176.
35. MOTULSKY, H. J., AND L. A. RANSNAS. 1987. Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal 1:365-374.
36. MUMA, K. E., AND P. J. WEATHERHEAD. 1989. Male traits expressed in females: direct or indirect sexual selection? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25:23-31.
37. MUMA, K. E., AND P. J. WEATHERHEAD. 1991. Plumage variation and dominance in captive female Red-winged Blackbirds. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:49-54.
38. NATIONAL INSTITUTES of HEALTH. 1996. NIH image manual (v 1.61). National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
39. NERO, R. W. 1956. A behavior study of the Red-winged Blackbird. II. Territoriality. Wilson Bulletin 68:129-150.
40. OLENDORF, R., T. GETTY, K. SCRIBNER, AND S. K. ROBINSON. 2004. Male Red-winged Blackbirds distrust unreliable and sexually attractive neighbours. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271:1033-1038.
41. ORIANS, G. H., AND G. M. CHRISTMAN. 1968. A comparative study of the behavior of Red-winged, Tricolored, and Yellow-Headed Blackbirds. University of California Publications in Zoology 84:1-81.
42. PARKER, P. G., T. C. JONES, J. HAYDOCK, H. DICKINSON, AND B. D. WORDEN. 1999. Multilocus minisatellite DNA fingerprinting and cooperative breeding. Behavioral Ecology and Sociology 47:108-111.
43. PEEK, F. W. 1972. Experimental study of territorial function of vocal and visual display in the male Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Animal Behaviour 20:112-118.
44. PRYKE, S. R., AND S. ANDERSSON. 2003a. Carotenoid-based epaulettes reveal male competitive ability: experiments with resident and floater Red-shouldered Widowbirds. Animal Behaviour 66:217-224.
45. PRYKE, S. R., AND S. ANDERSSON. 2003b. Carotenoid-based status signaling in Red-shouldered Widowbirds (Euplectes axillaris) : epaulet size and redness affect captive and territorial competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53:393-401.
46. PRYKE, S. R., S. ANDERSSON, M. J. LAWES, AND S. E. PIPER. 2002. Carotenoid status signaling in captive and wild Red-collared Widowbirds: independent effects of badge size and color. Behavioral Ecology 13:622-631.
47. RØSKAFT, E., AND S. ROHWER. 1987. An experimental study of the function of the red epaulettes and the black body color of male Red-winged Blackbirds. Animal Behaviour 35:1070-1077.
48. SAS Institute. 2006. JMP Version 6.0 users guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
49. SEARCY, W. A. 1979a. Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male Red-winged Blackbirds. Condor 81:417-420.
50. SEARCY, W. A. 1979b. Male characteristics and pairing success in Red-winged Blackbirds. Auk 96:353-363.
51. SEARCY, W. A. 1979c. Sexual selection and body size in male Redwinged Blackbirds. Evolution 33:649-661.
52. SEARCY, W. A., AND K. YASUKAWA. 1983. Sexual selection and Redwinged Blackbirds. American Scientist71:166-174.
53. SEARCY, W. A., AND K. YASUKAWA. 1995. Polygyny and sexual selection in Red-winged Blackbirds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
54. SMITH, D. G. 1972. The role of the epaulets in the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) social system. Behaviour 41:251-268.
55. WEATHERHEAD, P. J., AND P. T. BOAG. 1995. Pair and extra-pair mating success relative to male quality in Red-winged Blackbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37:81-91.
56. WEATHERHEAD, P. J., AND P. T. BOAG. 1997. Genetic estimates of annual and lifetime reproductive success in male Red-winged Blackbirds. Ecology 78:884-896.
57. WEATHERHEAD, P. J., R. MONTGOMERIE, H. L. GIBBS, AND P. T. BOAG. 1994. The cost of extra-pair fertilizations to female Redwinged Blackbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 258:315-320.
58. WEBSTER, M. S., S. PRUETT-JONES, D. F. WESTNEAT, AND S. J. ARNOLD. 1995. Measuring the effects of pairing success, extrapair copulations and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution 49:1147-1157.
59. WEBSTER, M. S., C. W. VARIAN, AND J. KARUBIAN. 2008. Plumage color and reproduction in the Red-backed Fairy-wren: why be a dull breeder? Behavioral Ecology 19:517-524.
60. WESTNEAT, D. F. 1993. Polygyny and extrapair fertilizations in eastern Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behavioral Ecology 4:49-60.
61. WESTNEAT, D. F. 2006. No evidence of current sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a bird with high variance in mating success. American Naturalist 167:E171-E189.
62. WILLIAMS, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
63. WOLFENBARGER, L. L. 1999a. Red coloration of male cardinals correlates with mate quality and territory quality. Behavioral Ecology 10:80-90.
64. WOLFENBARGER, L. L. 1999b. Female mate choice in Northern Cardinals: is there a preference for redder males? Wilson Bulletin 111:76-83.
65. WRIGHT, S. 1934. The method of path coefficients. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 5:161-215.
66. YASUKAWA, K. 1989. The costs and benefits of a vocal signal: the nest-associated 'chit' of the female Red-winged Blackbird, Agelaius phoeniceus. Animal Behaviour 38:866-874.
67. YASUKAWA, K., L. K. BUTLER, AND D. A. ENSTROM. 2009. Intersexual and intrasexual consequences of epaulet colour in male Red-winged Blackbirds: an experimental approach. Animal Behaviour 77:531-540.
68. YASUKAWA, K., AND W. A. SEARCY. 1995. Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus), no 184. In A. Poole and F. Gill [EDS.], The birds of North America. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
69. YASUKAWA, K., L. K. WHITTENBERGER, AND T. A. NIELSEN. 1992. Anti-predator vigilance in the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) : do males act as sentinels? Animal Behaviour 43:961-969.
70. YASUKAWA, K., D. A. ENSTROM, P. G. PARKER, AND T. C. JONES. 2010. Male Red-winged Blackbirds with experimentally dulled epaulets experience no disadvantage in sexual selection. Journal of Field Ornithology 81, in press.