Identification of the species of the Cheilosia variabilis group (Diptera, syrphidae) from the Balkan Peninsula using wing geometric morphometrics, with the revision of status of C. melanopa redi Vujić, 1996

Contributions to Zoology

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 129-140

  Francuski, Lj ^a   Vujic A ^a   Kovacevic A ^a   Ludoski J ^a   Milankov, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Cheilosia variabilis group; Geometric morphometrics; Intraspecific divergent units; Species delimitation; Wing shape; Wing size

Indexed keywords

CHEILOSIA VARIABILIS; DIPTERA; LASIOPA; SYRPHIDAE;

EID: 77249103723     PISSN: 13834517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/18759866-07803004     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams DC, Rohlf JF, Slice DE. 2004. Geometric morphomet- rics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. Italian Journal of Zoology 71: 5-16.
2. Barkalov A. 2002. A subgeneric classification of the genus Cheilosia Meigen, 1822 (Diptera, Syrphidae). Entomolog- icheskoje Obozrenie 81: 218-234 (in Russian with English abstract).
3. Barkalov AV, Ståhls G. 1997. Revision of the Palaearctic bareeyed and black-legged species of the genus Cheilosia Meigen (Diptera, Syrphidae). Acta Zoologica Fennica 208: 1-74.
4. Birdsall K, Zimmerman E, Teeter K, Gibson G. 2000. Genetic variation for the positioning of wing veins in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution & Development 2: 16-24.
5. Bischoff I, Schröder S, Misof B. 2009. Differentiation and range expansion of North American squash bee, Peponapis pruinosa (Apidae: Apiformes) populations assesed by geometric wing morphometry. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 102: 60-69.
6. Bitner-Mathé BC, Klaczko LB. 1999. Heritability, phenotypic and genetic correlations of size and shape of Drosophila mediopunctata wings. Heredity 83: 688-696.
7. Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Debat V, Bégin M, Legout H, David JR. 2003. Allometric and nonallometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond differently to developmental temperature. Evolution 57: 2773-2784.
9. Debat V, Milton CC, Rutherford S, Klingenberg CP, Hoffmann AA. 2006. HSP90 and the quantitative variation of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 60: 2529-2538.
10. Dušek J. 1962. Beitrag zur kenntnis von larven der Gattung Cheilosia Mg. (Diptera, Syrphidae). Acta Societatis Entomologicae Cechoslovenicae 59: 68-72.
11. Francuski Lj, Ludoški J, Vujić A, Milankov V. 2009. Wing geometric morphometric inferences on species delimitation and intraspecific divergent units in the Merodon ruficornis group (Diptera, Syrphidae) from the Balkan Peninsula. Zoological Science 26: 301-308.
12. Gilchrist AS, Azevedo RBR, Partridge L, O'Higgins P. 2000. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape. Evolution & Development 2: 114-124.
13. Haarto A, Kerppola S. 2007. Finnish hoverflies and some species in adjacent countries. Keuruuu: Otavan Kirjapaino Oy.
14. Hewitt GM. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907-913.
15. Hewitt GM. 2004. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London series B 359: 183-195.
16. Jirakanjanakit N, Leemingsawat S, Dujardin JP. 2008. The geometry of the wing of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti in isofemale lines through successive generations. Infection Genetics and Evolution 8: 414-421.
17. Kölliker-Ott UM, Blows MW, Hoffmann AA. 2003. Are wing size, wing shape and asymmetry related to field fitness to Trichogramma egg parasitoids? Oikos 100: 563-573.
18. Ludoški J, Francuski Lj, Vujić A, Milankov V. 2008. The Cheilosia canicularis group (Diptera: Syrphidae): species delimitation and evolutionary relationships based on wing geometric morphometrics. Zootaxa 1825: 40-50.
19. Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE. 1996. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum Press.
20. Marsteller S, Adams DC, Collyer ML, Condon M. 2009. Six cryptic species on a single species of host plant: morphometric evidence for possible reproductive character displacement. Ecological Entomology 34: 66-73.
21. Milankov V, Ståhls G, Stamenković J, Vujić A. 2008. Genetic diversity of populations of Merodon aureus and M. cinereus species complexes (Diptera, Syrphidae): integrative taxonomy and implications for conservation priorities on the Balkan Peninsula. Conservation Genetics 9: 1125-1137.
22. Milankov V, Ludoški J, Ståhls G, Stamenković J, Vujić A. 2009. High molecular and phenotypic diversity in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae): cryptic speciation in a diverse insect taxon. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 155: 819-833.
23. Moraes EM, Spressola VL, Prado PRR, Costa LF, Sene FM. 2004. Divergence in wing morphology among sibling species of Drosophila buzzatii cluster. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 42: 154-158.
24. Moritz C. 2002. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematics Biology 51: 238-254.
25. Myers N, Mittermeier R, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
26. Pincell J, Jordaens K, Pfenninger M, Backeljau T. 2005. Rangewide phylogeography of a terrestrial slug in Europe: evidence for Alpine refugia and rapid colonization after the Pleistocene glaciations. Molecular Ecology 14: 1133-1150.
27. Ryder OA. 1986. Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1: 9-10.
28. Reeve MW, Fowler K, Partridge L. 2000 Increased body size confers greater fitness at lower experimental temperature in male Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 836-844.
29. Rohlf FJ. 2004. tpsDig-Thin Plate Spline Digitizer, version 1.40. New York: State university of New York at Stony Brook.
30. Rohlf FJ. 2005. tpsRegr-Thin Plate Spline Shape Regression, version 1.31. New York: State university of New York at Stony Brook.
31. Rohlf FJ. 2006. tpsRelw-Thin Plate Spline Relative Warp, version 1.44. New York: State University of New York at Stony Brook.
32. Rohlf FJ, Slice D. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39: 40-59.
33. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8: 129-132.
34. Rohlf FJ, Loy A, Corti M. 1996. Morphometric analysis of old world talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) using partial-warp scores. Systematic Biology 45: 344-362.
35. Sneath PH, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.
36. Soto IM, Hasson ER, MAnfrin MH. 2008. Wing morphology is related to host plants in cactophilic Drosophila gouveai and Drosophila antonietae (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 655-665.
37. Speight MCD. 2007. Species accounts of European Syrphidae (Diptera). In: Speight MCD, Castella E, Sarthou EJP, Monteil C, eds. Syrph the Net, the database of European Syrphidae Vol. 55. Dublin: The Syrp Net publications.
38. Ståhls G, Stuke JH, Vujić A, Doczkal D, Muona J. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Cheilosia and the tribe Rhingiini (Diptera, Syrphidae) based on morphological and molecular characters. Cladistics 20: 105-122.
39. Ståhls G, Vujić A, Milankov V. 2008. Cheilosia vernalis-complex: molecular and morphological variability (Diptera, Syrphidae). Annales Zoologici Fennici 45: 149-159.
40. Stuke JH, Carstensen LB. 2000. Biologie und Morphologie des dritten Larvenstadium von Cheilosia lasiopa Kowarz, 1885 (Diptera, Syrphidae). Volucella 5: 95-101.
41. van Veen M. 2004. Hoverflies of Northwest Europe: identification keys to the Syrphidae. Utrecht: KNNV Publishing.
42. Vujić A. 1996. Genus Cheilosia Meigen and related genera (Diptera: Syrphidae) on the Balkan Peninsula. Novi Sad: Matica Srpska.