Multi-level modeling of dyadic data in sport sciences: Conceptual, statistical, and practical issues

Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 29-50

  Gaudreau, Patrick ^a   Fecteau, Marie Claude ^a   Perreault, Stéphane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dyads; Hierarchical linear modeling; Multi level

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DYADIC DATA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPORTS SCIENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VARIANCE;

EID: 77149176246     PISSN: 1091367X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10913670903455017     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analyses for categorical moderators. New York: Guilford Press.
2. Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A metaanalytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.
3. Beauchamp, M. R., & Eys, M. A. (2008). Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology. New York: Routledge.
4. Boslaugh, S. (2005). An intermediate guide to SPSS programming: Using syntax for data management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Brière, N. M., Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1995). Développement et validation d'une mesure de motivation intrinsèque, extrinsèque et d'amotivation en contexte sportif: L'Échelle de Motivation dans les Sports (ÉMS). [On the development and validation of the French form of the Sport Motivation Scale]. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 465-489.
6. Card, N. A., Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2008). Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral science. New York: Routledge.
7. Carron, A. V., Colman, M. M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 168-188.
8. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
9. Chen, G., Bliese, P. D., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 375-409.
10. Chen, G., & Gogus, C. I. (2008). Motivation in and of work teams: A multilevel perspective. In R. Kanfer, G. Chen, & R. D. Pritchard (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 285-318). New York: Routledge.
11. Chen, G., Mathieu, J. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2004). A framework for validating multi-level construct validation. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and processes (pp. 273-304). New York: Elsevier.
12. Chen, G., Webber, S. S., Bliese, P. D., Mathieu, J. E., Payne, S. C., & Born, D. H. (2002). Simultaneous examination of the antecedents and consequences of efficacy beliefs at multiple levels of analysis. Human Performance, 15, 381-409.
13. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109.
15. Gano-Overway, L. A., Guivernau, M., Magyar, T. M., Waldron, J. J., & Ewing, M. E. (2005). Achievement goal perspectives, perceptions of the motivational climate, and sportspersonship: Individual and team effects. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 215-232.
16. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1999). The correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguisable case. Personal Relationships, 6, 449-469.
17. Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430-439.
18. Harwood, C., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2008). Group functioning through optimal achievement goals. In M. R. Beauchamp & M. A. Eys (Eds.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology: Contemporary themes (pp. 201-220). New York: Routledge.
19. Heuzé, J. P., & Fontayne, P. (2002). Questionnaire sur l'Ambiance du Groupe: A French-language instrument for measuring group cohesion. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 42-67.
20. Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467-511). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21. Jackson, B., Beauchamp, M. R., & Knapp, P. (2007). Relational efficacy beliefs in athlete dyads: An investigation using Actor-Partner Interdependence Models. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 170-189.
22. Jowett, S. (2008). Coach-athlete relationships ignite sense of groupness. In M. R. Beauchamp & M. A. Eys (Eds.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology: Contemporary themes (pp. 63-78). New York: Routledge.
23. Kenny, D. A. (1995). The effect of nonindependence on significance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships, 2, 67-75.
24. Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
25. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
26. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
27. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211-236.
28. Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-277.
29. Langford, I. H., & Lewis, T. (1998). Outliers in multilevel data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 161, 121-160.
30. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2007). Missing data: A gentle introduction. New York: Guilford Press.
32. Myers, N. D., & Feltz, D. L. (2007). From self-efficacy to collective efficacy in sport: Transitional methodological issues. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 799-822). New York: Wiley.
33. Ntoumanis, N., & Vazou, S. (2005). Peer motivational climate in youth sport: Measurement development and validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27, 432-455. (Pubitemid 41739124)
34. Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 434-457.
35. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279-306.
36. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2007). HLM for Windows (Version 6.04) [Computer Program]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
38. Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583-625.
39. Sarrazin, P., & Vallerand, R. J. (2001). Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 1-24.
40. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Standage, M., & Vallerand, R. J. (2008). Self-determined motivation in sport and exercise groups. In M. R. Beauchamp & M. A. Eys (Eds.), Group dynamics in sport and exercise psychology: Contemporary themes (pp. 179-200). New York: Routledge.
42. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
43. Widmeyer, N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, ON: Sport Dynamics.