A Critical appraisal of circumferential resection margins in esophageal carcinoma

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 812-820

  Pultrum, Bareld B ^a   Honing, Judith ^a   Smit, Justin K ^a   Van Dullemen, Hendrik M ^a   Van Dam, Gooitzen M ^a   Groen, Henk ^a   Hollema, Harry ^a   Plukker, John Th M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TUMOR MARKER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGUS CARCINOMA; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROGNOSIS; RECURRENT CANCER; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 77149168764     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0827-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J Powell 2002 Continuing rising trend in oesophageal adenocarcinoma Int J Cancer. 102 422 427 10.1002/ijc.10721 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xos1ajtbg%3D 12402314 (Pubitemid 35265884)
2. JT Plukker HL van Westreenen 2006 Staging in oesophageal cancer Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 20 877 891 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.001 16997167 (Pubitemid 44391344)
3. T Lerut W Coosemans P De Leyn G Decker G Deneffe D Van Raemdonck 1999 Is there a role for radical esophagectomy Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16 Suppl 1 S44 S47 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00185-2 10536946 (Pubitemid 29431714)
4. LF Shao ZG Gao NP Yang GQ Wei YD Wang CP Cheng 1989 Results of surgical treatment in 6, 123 cases of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia J Surg Oncol. 42 170 174 10.1002/jso.2930420308 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2Fkt1eqtw%3D%3D 2811381
5. ED Mulligan B Dunne M Griffin N Keeling JV Reynolds 2004 Margin involvement and outcome in oesophageal carcinoma: a 10-year experience in a specialist unit Eur J Surg Oncol. 30 313 317 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.11.009 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7jsFOhtw%3D%3D 15028315 (Pubitemid 38425651)
6. CA Gall NA Rieger DA Wattchow 1996 Positive proximal resection margins after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and stomach: effect on survival and symptom recurrence Aust NZ J Surg. 66 734 737 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996. tb00732.x 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2Fns1SmtA%3D%3D
7. KF Birbeck CP Macklin NJ Tiffin W Parsons MF Dixon NP Mapstone, et al. 2002 Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery Ann Surg. 235 449 457 10.1097/00000658-200204000-00001 11923599 (Pubitemid 34258342)
8. IJ Adam MO Mohamdee IG Martin N Scott PJ Finan D Johnston, et al. 1994 Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer Lancet. 344 707 711 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92206-3 1:STN:280: DyaK2czlvFeisw%3D%3D 7915774 (Pubitemid 24281421)
9. P Luna-Perez E Bustos-Cholico I Alvarado A Maffuz S Rodriguez-Ramirez MG De La Barrera, et al. 2005 Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection J Surg Oncol. 90 20 25 10.1002/jso.20232 15786412 (Pubitemid 40446470)
10. ID Nagtegaal P Quirke 2008 What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 26 303 312 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.7027 18182672
11. RJ Heald RD Ryall 1986 Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Lancet. 1 1479 1482 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2 1:STN:280:DyaL283lsFylug%3D%3D 2425199
12. PM Sagar 1993 Significance of circumferential resection margin involvement after oesophagectomy for cancer Br J Surg. 80 1386 1388 10.1002/bjs.1800801109 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FntlKntw%3D%3D 8252343 (Pubitemid 23345093)
13. H Kuwano N Masuda H Kato K Sugimachi 2002 The subepithelial extension of esophageal carcinoma for determining the resection margin during esophagectomy: a serial histopathologic investigation Surgery. 131 S14 S21 10.1067/msy.2002. 119289 11821782 (Pubitemid 34118611)
14. SP Dexter H Sue-Ling MJ McMahon P Quirke N Mapstone IG Martin 2001 Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer Gut. 48 667 670 10.1136/gut.48.5.667 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3mtFKmsA%3D%3D 11302966 (Pubitemid 32378588)
15. LH Sobin 2003 TNM, sixth edition: new developments in general concepts and rules Semin Surg Oncol. 21 19 22 10.1002/ssu.10017 12923912 (Pubitemid 37127470)
16. C Mariette G Piessen N Briez JP Triboulet 2008 The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent Ann Surg. 247 365 371 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815aaadf 18216546 (Pubitemid 351156783)
17. D Bogoevski F Onken A Koenig JT Kaifi P Schurr G Sauter, et al. 2008 Is it time for a new TNM classification in esophageal carcinoma? Ann Surg. 247 633 641 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181656d07 18362626
18. PA Heeren HL van Westreenen GJ Geersing HM van Dullemen JT Plukker 2004 Influence of tumor characteristics on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in staging cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction Endoscopy 36 966 971 10.1055/s-2004-825956 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crkslGgsw%3D%3D 15520913 (Pubitemid 39485294)
19. C Mariette 2003 Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction Eur J Surg Oncol. 29 588 593 10.1016/S0748-7983(03) 00109-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svgsFGgsw%3D%3D 12943624 (Pubitemid 37121759)
20. E Bollschweiler SE Baldus W Schroder PM Schneider AH Holscher 2006 Staging of esophageal carcinoma: length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes. Are these independent prognostic factors? J Surg Oncol 94 355 363 10.1002/jso.20569 16967455 (Pubitemid 44465337)
21. MA Eloubeidi 2002 Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status Cancer 95 1434 1443 10.1002/cncr.10868 12237911
22. EA Griffiths Z Brummell G Gorthi SA Pritchard IM Welch 2006 Tumor length as a prognostic factor in esophageal malignancy: univariate and multivariate survival analyses J Surg Oncol. 93 258 267 10.1002/jso.20449 16496364
23. BP Wijnhoven KT Tran A Esterman DI Watson HW Tilanus 2007 An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus Ann Surg. 245 717 725 10.1097/01.sla.0000251703.35919.02 17457164 (Pubitemid 46684101)
24. JB Hulscher JW van Sandick AG de Boer BP Wijnhoven JG Tijssen P Fockens, et al. 2002 Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus N Engl J Med. 347 1662 1669 10.1056/NEJMoa022343 12444180 (Pubitemid 35340784)
25. V Sujendran J Wheeler R Baron BF Warren N Maynard 2008 Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circumferential margin positivity and its impact on prognosis in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer Br J Surg. 95 191 194 10.1002/bjs.5983 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FltV2hsA%3D%3D 17948302
26. AK Saha C Sutton O Rotimi S Dexter H Sue-Ling AI Sarela 2009 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of circumferential resection margin and stratification of N1 category Ann Surg Oncol. 16 1364 1370 10.1245/s10434-009-0396-6 19252949
27. SM Lagarde FJ Ten Kate JB Reitsma OR Busch JJ van Lanschot 2006 Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction J Clin Oncol. 24 4347 4355 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.9445 16963732 (Pubitemid 46630794)