The stewardship model: Current viability for genetic biobank practice development

Advances in Nursing Science

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Williams, Pamela Holtzclaw ^a   Schepp, Karen ^a   McGrath, Barbara ^a   Mitchell, Pamela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Biobank; Conceptual; Contributor; Genetic; Gift; Nursing; Partnership; Relationships; Stewardship; Subject

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COOPERATION; EDUCATION; ETHICS; EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MASS MEDIUM; MODEL; MOTIVATION; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUALITY CONTROL; TRUST;

ALTRUISM; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BENCHMARKING; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DATABASES, GENETIC; EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; GENETIC RESEARCH; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; MODELS, NURSING; MOTIVATION; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; TRUST;

EID: 77149161702     PISSN: 01619268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e3181cd8367     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kaiser J. Genetics: US hospital launches large biobank of children's DNA. Science. 2006;312(5780):1584-1585.
2. Ginsburg GS, Burke TW, Febbo P. Centralized biorepositories for genetic and genomic research. JAMA. 2008;299(11):1359-1361.
3. Kaufman D, Murphy J, Erby L, Hudson K, Scott J. Veterans' attitudes regarding a database from genomic research. Genet Med. 2009;11(5):329-337.
4. Kaiser J. Genomic medicine: African-American population biobank proposed. Science. 2003;300(5625): 1485.
5. Park A. Biobanks-10 ideas changing the world right now. TIME. March 12, 2009. http://www.time.com/ time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1884779 1884782 1884766,00.html
6. Jeffers B. Human biological materials in research: ethical issues and the role of stewardship in minimizing research risks. Adv Nurs Sci. 2001;24(2):32-46.
7. Wueste DE. A philosophical yet user-friendly framework for ethical decision making in critical care nursing. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2005;24(2):70-79.
8. Jenkins J, Calzone K. Establishing the essential nursing competencies for genetics and genomics. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(1):10-13.
9. Calzone KA, Jenkins J. Preparing nurses for the future: where do you fit into the implementation plans for essential genetics and genomics nursing competency? Nurs Outlook. 2007;55(2):114.
10. Fisher R. A closer look: are we subjects or are we donors? Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(11):49-50.
11. Knoppers B. Human genetic material: commodity or gift? In: Weir R, ed. Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal and Public Policy Implications. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press; 1998:226-236.
12. Meslin EM, Quaid KA. Ethical issues in the collection, storage, and research use of human biological materials. J Lab Clin Med. 2004;144(5):229-234, discussion 226.
13. Tutton R. Person, property and gift. In: Tutton R, CorriganO, eds. Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis; 2004:19-39.
14. Titmuss R. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London, England: Allen & Unwin; 1970.
15. Rapport F,Maggs C. Titmuss and the gift relationship: altruism revisited. J Adv Nurs. 2002;40(5):495-503.
16. Tutton R. Banking expectations: the promises and problems of biobanks. Per Med. 2007;4(4):463-469.
17. Marcus A. Patients with rare diseases work to jumpstart research. The Wall Street Journal. July 11, 2006:D1, D3.
18. The advocates. Nat Genet. 2006;38(4):391.
19. Terry S, Terry P, Rauen K, Uitto J, Bercovitch L. Advocacy groups as research organizations: the PXE International example. Nature Rev Genet. 2007;8:157-164.
20. Cody J. Creating partnerships and improving health care: the role of genetic advocacy groups. Genet Med. 2006;8(12):797-799.
21. Terry S, Boyd C. Researching the biology of PXE: partnering in the process. Am J Med Genet. 2001;106: 117-184.
22. Rabeharisoa V. The struggle against neuromuscular diseases in France and the emergence of the "partnership model"of patient organisation. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:2127-2136.
23. Lin A, Terry S, Lerner B, Anderson R, Irons M. Participation by clinical geneticists in genetic advocacy groups. Am J Med Genet. 2003;119A:89-92.
24. US Senate. Rare Diseases Act of 2002 (2002). Public L No. 107-280. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/ bill.xpd?bill=h107-4013. Accessed July 10, 2009.
25. Ponder M, Statham H, Hallowell N, Moon JA, Richards M, Raymond FL. Genetic research on rare familial disorders: consent and the blurred boundaries between clinical service and research. J Med Ethics. 2008; 34(9):690-694.
26. Hallowell N, Cooke S, Crawford G, Parker M, Lucassen A. Healthcare professionals' and researchers' understanding of cancer genetics activities: a qualitative interview study. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(2):113-119.
27. Steinke E. Research ethics, informed consent, and participant recruitment. Clin Nurse Spec. 2004; 18(2):88-97.
28. Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Schultz A. Transforming health care from the inside out: advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century. J Prof Nurs. 2005;21(6):335-344.
29. Hansson MG. Building on relationships of trust in biobank research. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(7):415-418.
30. Saad L. Nurses shine, bankers slump in ethics ratings: Annual Honesty and Ethics poll rates nurses best of 21 professions. http://www.gallup.com/poll/ 112264/Nurses-Shine-While-Bankers-Slump-Ethics- Ratings.aspx. Published 2008. Accessed March 25, 2009.
31. Sanner J, Frazier L. Factors that influence characteristics of genetic biobanks. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007; 39(1):25-29.