Human biological materials in research: Ethical issues and the role of stewardship in minimizing research risks

Advances in Nursing Science

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 32-46

  Jeffers, Brenda Recchia ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethical decision making; Genetics; Institutional review; Nursing ethics; Protection of human subjects

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL FACTOR;

ATTITUDE; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT; GENE; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL GENETICS; MODEL; NURSE ATTITUDE; PHILOSOPHY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOLOGICAL FACTORS; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); ETHICS, NURSING; GENES; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETICS; GENETICS, MEDICAL; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MODELS, NURSING; NURSE'S ROLE; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 0035654694     PISSN: 01619268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200112000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Eiseman E. Stored tissue samples: an inventory of sources in the United States. In: Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Volume II. Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission; 2000:D1-D52.
2. Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Volume I. Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission; 1999.
3. Holmes-Farley SR, Grodin MA. Foreword: law, medicine and socially responsible research. Am J Law Med. 1998;24:153-162.
4. Roy DJ, Kramar G, DeLangavant GC. Ethics for complexity. In: Knoppers BM, ed. Human DNA: Law and Policy. Boston: Klumer Law International; 1996:189-209.
5. Pound ET. Nurse's complaint led to probe of study. USA Today, July 11, 2000 [Online]. Available at http://www.usatoday.com/life/health/general/lhgen054. htm. Accessed August 2000.
6. Grizzle W, Grody WW, Noll WW, et al. Recommended policies for uses of human tissue in research, education, and quality control. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999;123(4): 296-300.
7. McEwen JE, Reilly PR. Setting standards for DNA banks: toward a model code of conduct. Microb Comp Genomics. 1996;1(3):165-177.
8. Buchanan A. An ethical framework for biological samples policy. In: Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Volume II. Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission; 2000:B1-B31.
9. Marshall E. Panel proposes tighter rules for tissue studies. Science. 1998;282(5397):2165-2166.
10. Kaiser J. Controls on DNA could impact research. Science. 1996;273(5273):299.
11. O'Neill O. Medical and scientific uses of human tissue. J Med Ethics. 1996;22(1):5-7.
12. Higgins D, Taylor W. Preface: bioinformatics: an emerging field. In: Higgins D, Taylor W, eds. Bioinformatics: Sequence, Structure and Databanks. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:v-ix.
13. Lashley FR, ed. The Genetics Revolution: Implications for Nursing. Washington, DC: American Academy of Nursing; 1997.
14. Glass KC. Challenging the paradigm: stored tissue samples and access to genetic information. In: Knoppers BM, ed. Human DNA: Law and Policy. Boston: Klumer Law International; 1996:157-162.
15. Kaye J, Martin P. Safeguards for research using large scale DNA collection. Br Med J. 2000;321: 1146-1149.
16. Stephenson J. Ethics group drafts guidelines for control of genetic material and information. JAMA. 1998;279(3):184.
17. Campbell CS. Religion and the body in medical research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J [Electronic version]. 1998;8(3): 275-305.
18. Andrews L, Nelkin D. Whose body is it anyway? Disputes over body tissue in a biotechnology age. Lancet. 1998;351:53-57.
19. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. Available at http://irb.ilstu.edu/OPRR/ Belmont_Report.htm. Accessed January 2001.
20. Families of children with degenerative brain disease file lawsuit over patent. State Journal-Register, November 19, 2000, 47.
21. Ashley B. Perspective of a moralist. In: McCarthy DG, ed. Responsible Stewardship of Human Life. St Louis: Catholic Hospital Association; 1976:35-42.
22. Simpson RL. Professional stewardship: a model for economic responsibility. Nurs Adm Q. 1987;11(2):49-53.
23. Flarey DL. Stewardship. J Nurs Adm. 1994;24(5):9-10.
24. Reichenbach BR, Anderson VE. On Behalf of God: A Christian Ethic for Biology. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B Eerdmans; 1995.
25. Block P. Stewardship: Choosing Service over Self-Interest. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 1993.
26. Magill G. The crucial role of stewardship in health care ethics. Paper presented at Saint Louis University Health Care Ethics in the Catholic Tradition; May 25, 2000; St Louis, MO.
27. Milewa T, Calnan M. Central line on the tubes: regulation of genetic research and development. Health Serv J. 2000;110(5694):33.
28. Weijer C. Protecting communities in research: philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999;8(4):501-513.
29. Fuller BP, Ellis-Kahn MJ, Barr PA, et al. Privacy in genetics research. Science. 1999;285(5432):1359-1361.
30. Clayton EW, Steinberg KK, Khoury MJ, et al. Informed consent for genetic research on stored tissue samples. JAMA. 1995;274(22):1786-1792.
31. Gray N, Womack C, Jack SJ. Supplying commercial biomedical companies from a human tissue bank in an NHS hospital: a view from personal experience. J Clin Pathol. 1999;52(4):254-256.
32. Nilsson A, Rose J. Genetic disease: Sweden takes steps to protect tissue banks. Science. 1999;286(5441):894.
33. Nelkin D, Andrews L. Homo economicus: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology. Hastings Cent Rep. 1998;28(5):30-39.
34. Cook-Deegan RM. Confidentiality, collective resources, and commercial genomics. In: Rothstein MA, ed. Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era. New Haven, CT: Yale University; 1997: 161-183.
35. Carper BA. Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Adv Nurs Sci. 1978;1(1):13-23.
36. Pence GE. Classic Cases in Medical Ethics. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
37. Anderson G. State of the science: social, psychological, and ethical nursing research in genetics. Biol Res Nurs. 1999;1(2):133-146.
38. Bragadóttir H. Children's rights in clinical research. J Nurs Sch. 2000;32(2):179-184.
39. Shamoo AE. Future challenges to human subjects protection. Scientist. 2000;14(13):35.