Lost in space, the sequel: Spatial sampling issues with 1-D PHABSIM

River Research and Applications

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 341-352

  Williams, John G ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bootstrap; IFIM; PHABSIM; Sampling uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAPPING; DISCHARGE; ERROR ANALYSIS; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; HABITAT QUALITY; INSTREAM FLOW; ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; SAMPLING;

EID: 77149161109     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1258     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Annear T, Chisholm I, Beecher H, Locke A, Aarrestad P, Coomer C, Estes C, Hunt J, Jacobson R, Jobsis G, Kauffman J, Marshall J, Mayes K, Smith G, Wentworth R, Stalnaker C. 2004. Instream Flows For Riverine Resource Stewardship. Instream Flow Council Cheyenne, Wyoming.
2. Bovee KD, Lamb BL, Bartholow J, Stalnaker CB, Taylor J, Henriksen J. 1998. Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Information and Technical Report USGS/BRD-1998-0004. http://www.mesc.usgs.gov/products/publications/3910/3910.pdf (May 2007).
3. Castleberry DT, Cech JJ Jr, Erman DC, Hankin D, Healey M, Kondolf GM, Mangel M, Mohr M, Moyle PB, Nielsen J, Speed TP, Williams JG. 1996. Uncertainty and instream flow standards. Fisheries 21(8): 20-21.
4. Cochran WG. 1977. Sampling Techniques (3rd edn). John Wiley & Sons: New York.
5. Collier KJ, Wakelin MD. Instream habitat use by blue duck (Hymenolaimus alacorhynchos) in a New Zealand River. Freshwater Biology 35: 277-287.
6. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
7. Efron B, Tibshirani R. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall: New York.
8. Gard M. 2005. Variability in flow-habitat relationships as a function of transect number for PHABSIM modeling. River Research and Applications 21: 1013-1029.
9. Hardy TB, Addley RC, Saraeva E. 2006. Evaluation of instream flow needs in the lower Klamath River, Phase II, Final Report. Institute for Natural Systems Engineering, Utah State University, Logan.
10. Hilborn R, Mangel M. 1997. The ecological detective. Monographs in Population Biology 28. Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey.
11. Jesson RJ. 1978. Statistical Survey Techniques. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
12. Kondolf GM, Larsen WE, Williams JG. 2000. Measuring and modeling the hydraulic environment for assessing instream flows. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20: 1016-1028.
13. Kristolic JL, Hayes DC, Ruhl PM. 2006. Physical habitat classification and instream flow modeling to determine habitat availability during lowflow periods, North Fork Shenandoah River, Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5025.
14. Manly BFJ. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology (2nd edn), Chapman and Hall: New York.
15. Manly BFJ. 2001. Statistics for Environmental Science and Management. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, Florida.
16. Maret TR, Hortness JE, Ott DS. 2006. Instream flow characterization of upper Salmon River Basin streams, Central Idaho, 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5230.
17. Neyman J. 1934. On the two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 97: 558-606.
18. Payne TR, Eggers SD, Parkinson DB. 2004. The number of transects required to compute a robust PHABSIM habitat index. Hydroécologie Appliquée 14: 27-53.
19. Stalnaker CB, Lamb L, Henriksen J, Bovee K, Bartholow J. 1995. The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology: a primer for IFIM. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, National Biological Survey, Biological Report 29.
20. Stevens DL Jr, Olsen AR. 2004. Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99: 262-278.
21. Stevens DL Jr, Larsen DP, Olsen AR. 2007. The role of sample surreys: why should practitioners consider using a statistical sampling design. In Salmonid Field Protocols Handbook: Techniques for Assessing Status and Trends in Salmon and Trout Populations, Johnson DH, Shrier BM, O'Neil JS, Knutzen JA, Augerot X, O'Neil TA, Parsons TN (eds). American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, Maryland; 11-24.
22. Thomas JA, Bovee KD. 1993. Application and testing of a procedure to evaluate transferability of habitat suitability criteria. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 8: 285-294.
23. Thompson SK. 2002. Sampling. (2nd edn). John Wiley & Sons: New York.
24. Waddle TJ. (ed.). 2001. PHABSIM for Windows: user's manual and exercises. US Geological Survey, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA: http://www.mesc.usgs.gov/products/publications/15000/15000.pdf (May 2007).
25. Washington State Dept. of Ecology. 2003. A Guide to Instream Flow Setting in Washington State. Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia: Washington; Publication Number 03-11-007.
26. Williams JG. 1996. Lost in space: minimum confidence intervals for idealized PHABSIM studies. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125: 458-465.
27. Williams JG. 2001. Testing models used for instream flow assessment. Fisheries 26(12): 19-20.
28. Williams JG, Speed TP, Forrest WF. 1999. Transferability of habitat suitability criteria. Comment. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19: 623-625.
29. Williams LR, Warren ML Jr, Adams SB, Arvai JL, Taylor CM. 2004. Basin visual estimation technique (CVET) and representative reach approaches to wadeable stream surveys: methodological limitations and future directions. Fisheries 29(8): 12-22.