Lost in Space: Minimum Confidence Intervals for Idealized PHABSIM Studies

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 125, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 458-465

  Williams, John G ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

CHINOOK SALMON; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; PHABSIM;

USA, CALIFORNIA, FEATHER RIVER;

EID: 0030299134     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1996)125<0458:LISMCI>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aceituno, M. E. 1993. The relationship between instream flow and physical habitat availability for Chinook salmon in the Stanislaus River, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region, Sacramento Field Office, Sacramento, California.
2. Bartz, B. 1990. Sources of uncertainty and effects on interpretation of results in the development of instream flows for fisheries habitat. Master’s thesis. Utah State University, Logan.
3. CDWR (California Department of Water Resources). 1982. Feather River spawning gravel baseline study. CDWR, Northern District, Red Bluff, California.
4. Efron, B., and R. Tibshirani. 1991. Statistical analysis in the computer age. Science 25:390-395.
5. Efron, B., and R. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York.
6. Elliott, J. M. 1994. Quantitative ecology and the brown trout. Oxford University Press, New York.
7. Jackson, T. A. 1992. Microhabitat utilization by juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in relation to stream discharge in the lower American River, California. Master's thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis.
8. Kondolf, G. M., and M. J. Sale. 1985. Application of historical channel stability analysis (HCSA) to instream flow studies. Pages 184-194 in F. W. Olson, R. G. White, and R. H. Hamre, editors. Symposium on small hydropower and fisheries. American Fisheries Society, Western Division and Bioengineering Section, Bethesda, Maryland.
9. Mathur, D., W. H. Basson, E. J. Purdy, Jr., and C A. Silver. 1985. A critique of the instream flow incremental methodology. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42:825-831.
10. Nestler, J. M., R. T. Milhous, and J. B. Layzer. 1989. Instream habitat modeling techniques. Pages 295-315 in J. A. Gore and G. E. Petts, editors. Alternatives in regulated river management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
11. Pert, J. E., and D. C. Erman. 1994. Habitat use by adult rainbow trout under moderate artificial fluctuations in flow. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 123:913-923.
12. Reiser, D. W., T. A. Wesche, and C. Estes. 1989. Status of instream flow legislation and practices in North America. Fisheries I4(2):22-29.
13. Shirvell, C. S. 1994. Effect of changes in streamflow on the microhabitat use and movements of sym-patric juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha) in a natural stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:1644-1652.
14. Snider, W. M., T. A. Jackson, P. M. Bratovich, and K. L. Carlson. 1992. Hydraulic simulation of the lower American River. California Department of Fish and Game, Environmental Services Division, Sacramento.
15. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1994. Identification of the instream flow requirements for anadromous fish in the streams within the Central Valley of California. Draft study proposal. USFWS, Ecological Services, Sacramento Field Office, Sacramento, California.
16. Williams, J. G. 1995. Report of the Special Master, Environmental Defense Fund v. East Bay Municipal Utility District. Alameda County (California) Superior Court, Action 425955, Hayward.