Urban ecological land in Changsha City: Its quantitative analysis and optimization

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 415-421

  Li, Xiao Li ^a   Zeng, Guang Ming ^a   Shi, Lin ^a   Liang, Jie ^a   Cai, Qing ^a  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

'Least cost' modeling; Catastrophe progression method; Fragstats software; GIS; Urban ecological land

Indexed keywords

CATASTROPHE THEORY; GIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; LAND USE PLANNING; OPTIMIZATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN ECOSYSTEM;

ARTICLE; CHINA; CITY; CITY PLANNING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; POACEAE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TREE;

CHINA; CITIES; CITY PLANNING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POACEAE; TREES;

CHANGSHA; CHINA; HUNAN;

EID: 77149133736     PISSN: 10019332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Colding J. 'Ecological land-use complementation' for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 81:46-55
2. Owen SM, MacsKenzie AR, Bunce RGH, et al. Urban land classification and its uncertainties using principal component and cluster analyses: A case study for the UK West Midlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 78:311-321
3. Deng X-W, Sun Y-C, Han S-J. General principles of urban ecological land classification and planning. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16 (l0) : 2003-2006 (in Chinese)
4. Zhang L-B, Li W-T, Wang W, et al. Research on space modeling for minimum urban ecological land based on GIS : A case in Shenzhen. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23 (1):69-78 (in Chinese)
5. Deng H-B, Chen C-D, Liu X, et al. Conception and function classification of regional ecological land. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29 (3):1519-1524 (in Chinese)
6. Zhou J-F, Zeng G-M, Huang G-H, et al. The ecological suitability evaluation on urban expansion land based on uncertainties. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27 (2):774-783 (in Chinese)
7. Cao X-J, Zeng G-M, Zhang S-F, et al. Ecological functional regionalization of Changsha City based on RS and GIS. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17 (7):1269-1273 (in Chinese)
8. Hua S, Xie G-X, Shi L, et al. Quantitative analysis and optimization of the landscape patterns based on GIS and FRAGSTATS in urban areas: A case in Changsha. Ecology and Environment, 2008, 17 (4):1554-1559 (in Chinese)
9. Zeng Z-B, Chen X-M, Li Y-S, et al. Study on the evaluation index system of ecological land in Qingpu District in Shanghai. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2007, 23 (11):328-332 (in Chinese)
10. Gu H-X, Zhu J, Wang X-R, et al. Study on Shanghai urban forest comprehensive evaluation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2005, 15 (3):119-123 (in Chinese)
11. She J-Y, Deng D-S, Xiao M. Study on evaluation of the sustainable development potentials of the urban forestry in Chang-zhu-tan area. Ecological Environment, 2008 (1):415-417 (in Chinese)
12. Thom R. Structural Stability and Morphogenesis. Benjamin: Reading Mass, 1975
13. Poston T, Stewant I. Catastrophe Theory and Application. Lord : Pitman, 1978
14. Chen Y-F, Sun D-Y, Lu G-F. Application of catastrophe progression method in ecological suitability assessment: A case study on Zhenjiang new area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26 (8):2587-2593 (in Chinese)
15. Wei T, Zhu X-D, Li Y-F, et al. Application of catastrophe progression method in assessing urban ecological security of Xiamen City, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19 (7):1522-1528 (in Chinese)
16. Han Y, Li J-Y. Study on Comprehensive Assessment and Example. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press; 2005 (in Chinese)
17. Ding X-Y. The Theoretical and Practical Study on the Construction and Planning of Urban Forest. Changsha: Hunan University Press, 2007 (in Chinese)
18. Shi Y-Q, Liu Y-L, He J-P. Further study on some questions of catastrophe evaluation method. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2003, 36 (4):132-136 (in Chinese)
19. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, Blust GD, et al. The application of 'least-cost' modeling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 64:233-247
20. Zhang H-F, Wang Y-L, Li Z-G. Landscape pattern optimization based upon the concept of landscape functions network: A case study in Taiwan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25 (7):1707-1713 (in Chinese)
21. Li J-H, Liu X-H. Research of the nature reserve zonation based on the least-cost distance model. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21 (2):217-224 (in Chinese)
22. Wu J-F, Zeng H, Liu Y-Q. Landscape ecological connectivity assessment of Shenzhen City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28 (4):1691-1701 (in Chinese)
23. Chen L-D, Fu B-J, Zhao W-W. Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological significance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26 (5):1444-1449 (in Chinese)
24. Costanza R, deArge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world' s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387:253-260
25. Fu B-J, Chen L-D, Ma K-M, et al. The Principle and Application on Landscape Ecology. Beijing: Science Press, 2002 (in Chinese)
26. Marulli J, Mallarach JM. A GIS methodology for assessing ecological connectivity: Application to the Barcelona Metropolitan Area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 71:243-262
27. Jongman RHG, Kulvik M, Kristiansen I. European ecological networks and green ways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 68:305-319
28. Wu J, Shen W, Sun W, et al. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology, 2002, 17:761-782