Landscape ecological connectivity assessment of Shenzhen City

Shengtai Xuebao/ Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1691-1701

  Wu, Jian Feng ^a   Zeng, Hui ^a   Liu, Ya Qin ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Ecological connectivity; Least cost' modeling; Shenzhen; Urbanization

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350531569     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Teschendorf L, Fahrig L. How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15: 633-641.
2. Chen LD, Fu B J. The ecological significance and application of landscape connectivity. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 1996, 15(4): 37-42.
3. Jiang G S, Zhang H M, et al. The fragmentation and impact factors of red deer habitat in Wandashan region, Heilongjiang Province, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 25(7): 1691-1698.
4. Jordan F, Baldi A, et al. Characterizing the importance of habitat patches and corridors in maintaining the landscape connectivity of a Pholidoptera transsylvanica (Orthoptera) metapopulation. Landscape Ecology, 2003, 18: 83-92.
5. Ferreras P. Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx. Biological Conservation, 2001, 100: 125-136.
6. Timothy S H. Using measures of cost distance in the estimation of polity boundaries in the Postclassic Yautepec valley, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2004, 31: 799-814.
7. Chen L D, Liu X H, et al. Evaluation giant panda habitat fragmentation in Wolong nature reserve. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 19(3): 291-297.
8. Yu K J. Landscape ecological security patterns in biological conservation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 19(1): 8-15.
9. Niu Z G, Li B G, et al. Optimum land-use patterns based on regional available soil water. Transactions of the CSAE, 2002, 18(3): 173-177.
10. Chen W B, Sun H F, et al. A preliminary study on resistance model of forest hydrological ability security. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2004, 26(3): 385-389.
11. Zeng H, Xia J, et al. The current status of urban landscape ecology study and its perstectives. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2003, 23(4): 484-492.
12. Han W Q, Chang Y, et al. Research advance in landscape pattern optimization. Chinese Journal Ecology, 2005, 24 (12): 1487-1492.
13. Chang H F, Wang Y L, et al. Landscape pattern optimization based upon the concept of landscape functions network: a case study in Taiwan, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 25(7): 1707-1713.
14. Chang H F, Wang Y L, et al. Landscape functions network construction and application in watershed scale: a case study on Taiwan Wuxi Watershed. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(6): 974-980.
15. Wu J G. Landscape ecology: pattern, process, scale and hierarchy. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. 213-256.
16. Urban Planning & Land Management Bureau of Shenzhen. Shenzhen land resources. Beijing: Dadi Publishing House of China, 1998. 11-38.
17. Li W F, Wang Y L, et al. Spatial approaches to ecological regulation in urban areas: a case in Shenzhen. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 23(9): 1823-1831.
18. Hu Z Y, Liu LY, et al. Research of population and economy in Shenzhen. China Opening Herald, 2005, 4: 82-85.
19. Simberloff D S, Wilson E O. Experimental zoogeography of islands: The Colonization of Empty Islands. Ecology, 1969, 50: 278-286.
20. Li J H, Liu X H. Research of the nature reserve zonation based on the least-cost distance model. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(2): 217-224.
21. Adriaensen F, Chardon J P, et al. The application of 'least-cost' modeling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 64: 233-247.
22. Michels E, Cottenie K, et al. Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton populations in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modeling of the effective geographical distance. Molecular Ecology, 2001, 10: 1929-1938.
23. Yu K J. Ecologically strategic points in landscape and surface model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53: 11-20.
24. Kaule G. Principles for mitigation of habitat fragmentation. In: Canters ed. Proceedings of the International Conference on Habitat Fragmentation, Infrastructures and the Roles of Ecological Engineering. Maaastricht and The Hague, The Netherlands, September, 1995. 17-21.
25. Marulli J, Mallarach J M. A GIS methodology for assessing ecological connectivity: application to the Barcelona Metropolitan Area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 71: 243-262.
26. Shi P J, Pan Y Z, et al. Land use/cover change and environmental security in Shenzhen region. Journal of Natural Resources, 1999, 14(4): 293-299.
27. Wang A M, Liu J L. Guides of land for non-construction use in hightly urbanization: research on Shenzhen case. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2005, 44: 314-317.
28. Hidding M C, Teunissen A. Beyond fragmentation: new concepts for urban-rural development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 58: 297-308.
29. With K A, Crist T O. Critical thresholds in species response to landscape structure. Ecology, 1995, 76(8): 2446-2459.
30. Weber T, Sloan A, Wolf J. Maryland's Green Infrastructure Assessment: Development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 77: 94-110.
31. Yu K J, Huang G, et al. Construction and organization of the landscape networks: discussion on the landscape ecological planning of the Beijing shihua-cave scenic area. Urban Planning, 2005, 3: 76-81.
32. Zhu Q, Yu K J, et al. The width of ecological corridor in landscape planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 25(9): 2406-2412.
33. Chang H F, Wang Y L, et al. Discussion of landscape functions network structure and level. Progress in Geography, 2005, 24(1): 52-60.
34. Young C H, Jarvis P J. Measuring urban habitat fragmentation: an example from the Black Country, UK. Landscape Ecology, 2001, 16: 643-658.