Studying the impact of uncertainty in operational release planning - An integrated method and its initial evaluation

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 446-461

  Al Emran, Ahmed ^a   Kapur, Puneet ^b   Pfahl, Dietmar ^a,c,d   Ruhe, Guenther ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b Chartwell Technology Inc   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d SIMULA RESEARCH LABORATORY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Discrete event simulation; Explorative case study; Heuristic optimization; Impact analysis; Operational release planning; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ADDED VALUES; HEURISTIC OPTIMIZATION; IMPACT ANALYSIS; INTEGRATED METHOD; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; PROCESS SIMULATIONS; PROCESS STEPS; RELEASE PLANNING; UNCERTAINTY FACTORS;

HEURISTIC METHODS; INTEGRATED CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 77049128239     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. H. Ziv, D.J. Richardson, R. Klösch, The Uncertainty Principle in Software Engineering, Technical Report UCI-TR-96-33, University of California, Irvine, 1996.
2. Stark G., Skillicorn A., and Ameele R. An examination of the effects of requirements changes on software maintenance releases. J. Softw. Maint. Res. Pract. 11 (1999) 293-309
3. Bolch A. Murphy's Law. 26th Anniversary ed. (2003), The Berkley Publishing Group, New York
4. Kapur P., Ngo-The A., Ruhe G., and Smith A. Optimized staffing for product releases and its application at Chartwell technology. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. 20 (2008) 365-386
5. Kellner M.I., Madachy R.J., and Raffo D.M. Software process simulation modeling: Why? What? How?. J. Syst. Softw. 46 2/3 (1999) 91-105
6. F. Padberg, Using process simulation to compare scheduling strategies for software projects, in: Proceeding of the 9th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 2002, pp. 581-592.
7. Gruschke T.M., and Jørgensen M. The role of outcome feedback in improving the uncertainty assessment of software development effort estimates. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 17 4 (2007)
8. Verner J.M., Evanco W.M., and Cerpa N. State of the practice: an exploratory analysis of schedule estimation and software project success prediction. Inform. Softw. Technol. 49 (2007) 181-193
9. Turban E., Aronson J.E., and Liang T.P. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems (2005), Pearson Prentice Hall
10. Al-Emran A., Kapur P., Pfahl D., and Ruhe G. Simulating worst case scenarios and analyzing their combined effect in operational release planning. In: Wang Q., Pfahl D., and Raffo D.M. (Eds). ICSP 2008, LNCS 5007 (2008), Springer, Berlin 269-281
11. Pfahl D. ProSim/RA - software process simulation in support of risk assessment. In: Biffl S., Aurum A., Boehm B., Erdogmus H., and Grünbacher P. (Eds). Value-based Software Engineering (2005), Springer, Berlin 263-286
12. Al-Emran A., Pfahl D., and Ruhe G. A method for re-planning of software releases using discrete-event simulation. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 13 (2007) 19-33
13. G. Antoniol, M. Di Penta, M. Harman, Search-based techniques applied to optimization of project planning for a massive maintenance project, in: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2005, pp. 240-249.
14. Chang C., Christensen M., and Zhang T. Genetic algorithms for project management. Ann. Softw. Eng. 11 (2001) 107-139
15. Duggan J., Byrne J., and Lyons G.J. A task allocation optimizer for software construction. IEEE Softw. 21 3 (2004) 76-82
16. Ngo-The A., and Ruhe G. Optimized resource allocation for software release planning. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35 (2009) 109-123
17. H. Zhang, B. Kitchenham, D. Pfahl, Software process simulation modeling: facts, trends and directions, in: Proceedings of the 15th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 2008, pp. 59-66.
18. Yang B., Hu H., and Jia L. A study of uncertainty in software cost and its impact on optimal software release time. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 34 6 (2008) 813-825
19. G. Antoniol, M. Di Penta, M. Harman, A robust search-based approach to project management in the presence of abandonment, rework, error and uncertainty, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Software Metrics Symposium, 2004, pp. 172-183.
20. F. Padberg, Computing optimal scheduling policies for software projects, in: Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, 2004, pp. 300-308.
21. F. Padberg, On the potential of process simulation in software project schedule optimization, in: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2005, pp. 127-130.
22. Pfahl D., Al-Emran A., and Ruhe G. A system dynamics model for analyzing the stability of software release plans. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 12 (2007) 475-490
23. Shepperd M., and Schofield C. Estimating software project effort using analogies. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 23 (1997) 736-743
24. Boehm B.W., Abts C., Brown A.W., Chulani S., Clark B.K., Horowitz E., Madachy R., Reifer D.J., and Steece B. Software cost estimation with COCOMO II (2000), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
25. Acuña S., Juristo N., and Moreno A.M. Emphasizing human capabilities in software development. IEEE Softw. 23 (2006) 94-101
26. Anseimo D., and Donald H. Measuring productivity in the software industry. Commun. ACM 46 (2003) 121-125
27. Johnson D. The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis. The Statistician 46 (1997) 387-398
28. A. Al-Emran, K. Khosrovian, D. Pfahl, G. Ruhe, Simulation-based uncertainty analysis for planning parameters in operational product management, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology, Antalya, Turkey, 2007, pp. 191-201.
29. Kolisch R., and Hartmann S. Heuristic algorithms for solving the resource-constrained project scheduling problem: classification and computational analysis. In: Weglarz J. (Ed). Project Scheduling: Recent Models, Algorithms and Applications (1999), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Berlin 147-178
30. Kolisch R., and Hartmann S. Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174 (2006) 23-37
31. Wohlin C., Runeson P., Höst M., Ohlsson M.C., Regnell B., and Wesslén A. Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts
32. The Standish Group, CHAOS Summary 2009, Boston, MA, April 23, 2009.
33. The Standish Group, Solutions for Enterprise Project and Portfolio Management, Boston, MA, April 23, 2009.
34. Kitchenham B.A., Pickard L., Linkman S., and Jones P. A framework for evaluating a software bidding model. Inform. Softw. Technol. 47 (2005) 747-760
35. Kitchenham B.A., Pickard L., and Linkman S. Experiences of using an evaluation framework. Inform. Softw. Technol. 47 (2005) 761-774