Embedded systems architecture: Evaluation and analysis

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4214 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 145-162

  Florentz, Bastian ^a   Huhn, Michaela ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT; ARCHITECTURE DESIGNS; ARCHITECTURE EVALUATION; ARCHITECTURE EXPLORATION; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; INNOVATION CYCLES; ITS EVALUATION; KEY ISSUES; META MODEL; MODEL BASED APPROACH; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; EMBEDDED SOFTWARE; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 77049115231     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11921998_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. ISO: ISO/IEC 9126 Information technology - Software product evaluation - Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use (1991) First edition.
2. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. (1998)
3. Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Garlan, D., Ivers, J., Little, R., Nord, R., Stafford, J.: Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond. Addison-Wesley (2002)
4. Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA (2000)
5. Florentz, B.: Systemarchitekturevaluation: Integration unterschiedlicher Kriterien. In: 26. Tagung 'Elektronik im Kfz'. (2006)
6. Kazman, R., Abowd, G.D., Bass, L.J., Clements, P.: Scenario-Based Analysis of Software Architecture. IEEE Software 13(6) (1996) 47-55
7. Kazman, R., Klein, M.H., Barbacci, M.R., Longstaff, T.A., Lipson, H.F., Carriere, S.J.: The Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method. In: ICECCS. (1998) 68-78
8. Bergner, K., Rausch, A., Sihling, M., Ternité, T.: DoSAM - Domain-Specific Software Architecture Comparison Model. In: QoSA-SOQUA. Volume 3712 of LNCS. (2005) 4-20
9. Lung, C.H., Kalaichelvan, K.: An Approach to Quantitative Software Architecture Sensitivity Analysis. IJSEKE 10(1) (2000) 97-114
10. Happe, J.: Predicting Mean Service Execution Times of Software Components Based on Markov Models. In: QoSA-SOQUA. Volume 3712 of LNCS. (2005) 53-70
11. Koziolek, H., Firus, V.: Empirical Evaluation of Model-Based Performance Prediction Methods in Software Development. In: QoSA-SOQUA. Volume 3712 of LNCS. (2005) 188-202
12. Reussner, R., Hasselbring,W.: Handbuch der Software-Architektur. Dpunkt Verlag (2006)
13. Wandeler, E., Thiele, L., Verhoef, M.H.G., Lieverse, P.: System Architecture Evaluation Using Modular Performance Analysis - A Case Study. In: ISoLA. (2004)
14. Liu, C.L., Layland, J.W.: Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment. J. ACM 20(1) (1973) 46-61
15. Babar, M.A., Gorton, I.: Comparison of Scenario-Based Software Architecture Evaluation Methods. In: APSEC. (2004) 600-607
16. Babar, M.A., Zhu, L., Jeffery, D.R.: A Framework for Classifying and Comparing Software Architecture Evaluation Methods. In: ASWEC. (2004) 309-319
17. Dobrica, L., Niemelä, E.: A Survey on Software Architecture Analysis Methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(7) (2002) 638-653
18. Ionita, M.T., Hammer, D.K., Obbink, H.: Scenario-Based Software Architecture Evaluation Methods: An Overview. In: ICSE/SARA. (2002)
19. Bahsoon, R., Emmerich, W.: Evaluating Software Architectures: Development, Stability, and Evolution. In: AICCSA. (2003)
20. Stoermer, C., Bachmann, F., Verhoef, C.: SACAM: The Software Architecture Comparison Analysis Method. Technical Report SEI/CMU-2003-TR-006, SEI (2003)