Approach to quantitative software architecture sensitivity analysis

International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 97-114

  Lung, Chung Horng ^a   Kalaichelvan, Kalai ^a  

^a NORTEL NETWORKS   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

REAL TIME TELECOMMUNICATION SOFTWARE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0034136632     PISSN: 02181940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0218-1940(00)00007-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. V. Arora, Kalai Kalaichelvan, N. Goel, and R. Munikoti, "Measuring high-level design complexity of real-time object-oriented systems", Proc. Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, 1995, pp. 91-94.
2. V. R. Basili, G. Caldiera, and H. D. Rombach, "The goal question metric approach", Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, ed. J. Marcinak (Wiley, 1994).
3. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman, Software Archiecture in Practice (Addison-Wesley, 1998).
4. S. Bot, C.-H. Lung, and M. Farrel, "A stakeholder-centric software architecture analysis approach", Proc. Int'l Software Architecture Workshop (ISAW), 1996, pp. 152-154.
5. D. N. Card and R. L. Glass, Measuring Software Design Quality (Prentice-Hall, 1990).
6. H. Dhama, "Quantitative models of cohesion and coupling in software", J. Systems & Software 29 (1995) 65-74.
7. D. Garlan and M. Shaw, "An introduction to software architecture", Advances in Sw. Eng. and Knowledge Eng., vol. 1, 1993.
8. G. Heyliger, "Coupling", Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, ed. J. Marcinak (Wiley, 1994).
9. I. Jacobson, M. Griss, and P. Jonsson, Software Reuse: Architecture, Process, and Organization for Business Success (ACM Press and Addison-Wesley, 1997).
10. K. Kalaichelvan and R. Munikoti, "Developing robust software architectures", in Workshop on Software Architecture Evaluation Best Practices (invited paper), Software Engineering Institute, May 1996.
11. R. Kazman, L. Bass, G. Abowd, and M. Webb, "SAAM: A method for analyzing the Properties Software Architectures", Proc. ICSE 16 (1994) 81-90.
12. R. Kazman, G. Abowd, L. Bass, and P. Clements, "Scenario-based analysis of software architecture", IEEE Software 13, 6 (1996) 47-55.
13. R. Kazman, M. Klein, M. Barbacci, T. Longstaff, H. Lipson, and J. Carriere, "The architecture tradeoff analysis method", Proc. 4th Int'l Conf. on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems; Aug. 1998, pp. 68-78.
14. T. Khoshkoftaar, E. Allen, K. Kalaichelvan, and N. Goel, "The impact of software evolution and reuse on software quality", Empirical Software Engineering 1, no. 1 (1997) 31-44.
15. V. D. Kirova and H. G. Kradjel, "The DirSA case study: an introduction to software architecture technology", Bells Labs Technical Journal, July-Sep. 1998, pp. 125-137.
16. P. B. Kruchten, "The 4+1 view model of architecture", IEEE Software, Nov. 1995, pp. 42-50.
17. C.-H. Lung, "Empirical experiences in analyzing software architecture sensitivity", Proc. COMPSAC, 1997, pp. 164-165.
18. C.-H. Lung, S. Bot, K. Kalaichelvan, and R. Kazman, "An approach to software architecture analysis for revolution and reusability," Proc. CASCON, 1997, pp. 144-154.
19. C.-H. Lung, A. Jalnapurkar, and A. El-Rayess, "Performance-oriented software architecture analysis: an experience report", Proc. 1st Int'l Workshop on Software Performance (WOSP), Oct. 1998, pp. 101-104.
20. C.-H. Lung, "Software architecture recovery and restructuring through clustering techniques", Proc. 3rd Int'l Software Architecture Workshop (ISAW), Nov. 1998, pp. 191-196.
21. D. E. Perry and A. L. Wolf, "Foundations for the study of software architecture", Software Engineering Notes 17, no. 4 (1992) 40-52.
22. K. T. Ulrich and S. D. Eppinger, Product Design and Development (McGraw-Hill, 1995).