Acquiring design rationale automatically

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 115-135

  Myers, Karen L ^a   Zumel, Nina B ^a   Garcia, Pablo ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PRODUCT DESIGN;

CLUSTERING; DESIGN RATIONALE; RATIONALE CONSTRUCTION FRAMEWORK;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 0034171496     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060400142027     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bentley Systems, Inc. (1995). MicroStation modeler user's guide. Version 5.5.
2. Brazier, F.M., van Langen, P.H., & Treur, J. (1997). A compositional approach to modelling design rationale. AIEDAM 11, 125-139.
3. Carroll, J.M., & Moran, T.P. (1991). Special issue on Design Rationale. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6(3-4).
4. Chen, A., Dietterich, T.G., & Ullman, D.G. (1991). A computer-based design history tool. NSF Design and Manufact. Conf., 985-994.
5. Conklin, E.J., & Yakemovic, K.B. (1991). A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, 357-391.
6. De Kleer, J., & Brown, J.S. (1984). A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artif. Intell. 24, 1-83.
7. Fischer, G., & Lemke, A.C. (1988). Construction kits and design environments: Steps toward human problem-domain communication. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, 179-192.
8. Fischer, G., Lemke, A.C., McCall, R., & Morch, A.I. (1991). Making argumentation serve design. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, 393-419.
9. Ganeshan, R., Garrett, J., & Finger, S. (1994). A framework for representing design intent. Design Stud. 15(1), 59-84.
10. Garcia, A.C.B., & de Souza, CS. (1997). ADD +: Including rhetorical structures in active documents. AIEDAM 11, 109-124.
11. Garcia, A.C.B., de Andrade, J.C., Rodrigues, R.F., & Moura, R. (1997). ADDVAC: Applying active design documents for the capture, retrieval, and use of rationale during offshore platform VAC design. Proc. Ninth Conf. Innovative Applications Artificial Intell., 986-991.
12. Garcia, A.C.B., & Howard, H.C. (1992). Acquiring design knowledge through design decision justification. AIEDAM 6(1), 59-71.
13. Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26-36.
14. Gruber, T.R. (1991). Interactive acquisition for justifications: Learning 'why' by being told 'what.' IEEE Expert 6(4), 65-75.
15. Gruber, T.R., & Russell, D.M. (1992). Generative design rationale: Beyond the record and replay paradigm. Technical Report No. KSL 92-59. Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
16. Gruber, T. R. & Russell, D. M. (1996). Generative design rationale: Beyond the record and replay paradigm. In Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, (T.P. Moran and J.M. Carroll, Eds.) pp. 323-349. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
17. Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D., & Norman, D.A. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In User Centered System Design, New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, (D. Norman and S. Draper, Eds.) pp. 87-124. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.
18. Iwasaki, Y., & Simon, H.A. (1986). Causality in device behavior. Artif. Intell. 29(1), 3-32.
19. Iwasaki, Y., & Simon, H.A. (1994). Causality and model abstraction. Artif. Intell. 67(1), 143-194.
20. Kuffner, T.A., & Ullman, D.G. (1990). The information requests of mechanical design engineers. Design Stud. 12(1), 42-50.
21. Ling, S.R., Kim, J., Will, P., & Luo, P. (1997). Active catalog: Searching and using catalog information in internet-based design. Proc. ASME Design Eng. Tech. Conf. (Proceedings published on CD.)
22. Moran, T.P., & Carroll, J.M. (1996). Overview of design rationale. In Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. (T.P. Moran and J.M. Carroll, Eds.) pp. 1-19.
23. Qureshi, S.M., Shah, J.J., Urban, S.D., Harter, E., Parazzoli, C., & Bluhm, T. (1997). Integration model to support archival of design history in databases. Proc. ASME Design Theory Methodol. Conf. (Proceedings published on CD.)
24. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155-169.
25. Russell, D.M., Burton, R.R., Jordan, D.S., Jensen, A.M., Rogers, R.A., & Choen, J. (1990). Creating instruction with IDE: Tools for instructional designers. Intell. Tutoring 1(1), 3-16.
26. Shipman, F.M., & McCall, R.J. (1997). Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: Supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication. AIEDAM 11, 141-154.
27. Ullman, D.G., Dietterich, T.G., & Stauffer, L.A. (1988). A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data. AIEDAM 2(1), 33-52.