Team assessment in stroke rehabilitation

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 411-419

  Duff, Jane ^a  

^a STOKE MANDEVILLE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Empowerment; Goal planning; Needs assessment; Rehabilitation planning

Indexed keywords

AGED; APHASIA; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DYSARTHRIA; GOAL ATTAINMENT; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOBILIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARALYSIS; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY; PROCESS MODEL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REVIEW; SKILL; SPEECH; STROKE; TEAMWORK; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT CARE TEAM; REHABILITATION CENTERS; STROKE;

EID: 76949103995     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1606-411     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Wade DT. Editorial: evidence relating to assessment in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:183-186.
2. Locke EA, Latham GP. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990.
3. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Am Psychol. 2002;57(9):705-717.
4. Locke E, Frederick E, Bobko P, Lee C. Effect of self-efficacy, goals and task strategies on task performance. J Psychol. 1984;69:241-251.
5. Keith RA, Lipsey MW. The role of theory in rehabilitation assessment, treatment and outcomes. In: Glueckauf RL, Secrest LB, Bond GR, McDonel EC, eds. Improving Assessment in Rehabilitation and Health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1993:33-60.
6. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
7. Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Clearly PD, et al. Failure of physicians to recognize functional disability in ambulatory patients. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114: 451-454.
8. Cunningham C, Horgan F, Keane N, Connolly P, Mannion A, O'Neil D. Detection of disability by different members of an interdisciplinary team. Clin Rehabil. 1996;10:247-254.
9. McGrath JR, Davis AM. Rehabilitation: where are we going and how do we get there? Clin Rehabil. 1992;6:225-235.
10. McGrath JR, Adams L. Patient-centered goal planning: a systematic psychological therapy? Top Stroke Rehabil. 1999;6(2):43-50.
11. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning and Disability (ICIDH-2). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
12. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State Med J. 1965;14: 61-65.
13. Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Guide for the Use of Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation. Buffalo, NY: Research Foundation of State University of New York; 1990.
14. Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. Br Med J. 2000;320:1385-1388.
15. Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(4):308-312.
16. Bower E, McLellan DL, Arney J, Campbell MJ. A randomized controlled trial of different intensities of physiotherapy and different goal-setting procedures in 44 children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38(3):226-237.
17. Norris-Baker C, Stephens MA, Rintala DH, Willems EP. Patient behavior as a predictor of outcomes in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981;62(12): 602-608.
18. Glueckauf RL. Use and misuse of assessment in rehabilitation. In: Glueckauf RL, Secrest LB, Bond GR, McDonel EC, eds. Improving Assessment in Rehabilitation and Health (pp33-60). Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:33-60.
19. Department of Health. The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century. London, UK: Author; 2001.
20. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Origins and function of positive and negative affect: a control process review. Psychol Rev. 1990;97:19-36.
21. McGrath JR, Marks JA, Davis AM. (1995). Towards interdisciplinary rehabilitation: further developments at Rivermead Rehabilitation Centre. Clin Rehabil. 1995;9:320-326.
22. Sivaraman Nair KP. Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17: 192-202.
23. Kennedy P, Hamilton LR. The needs assessment checklist: a clinical approach to measuring outcome. Spinal Cord, 1999;37(2):136-139.
24. Duff J, Evans MJ, Kennedy P. Goal planning: a retrospective audit of rehabilitation process and outcome. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:275-286.
25. Berry C, Kennedy P. A psychometric analysis of the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC). Spinal Cord. 2002;41:490-501.
26. Ryan TA. Intentional Behavior. New York: Ronald Press; 1970.
27. Duff J. Rehabilitation planning. In: Kennedy P, ed. Psychological Management of Physical Disabilities. UK: Routledge; 2007:222-241.
28. Locke EA, Alavi M, Wagner J. Participation in decision making: an information exchange perspective. In: Ferris G, ed. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Vol.15. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1997: 293-331.
29. Latham GP, Erez M, Locke E. Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. J Appl Psychol. 1988;73:753-772.
30. Duff J. Rehabilitation and goal planning approaches following spinal cord injury: facilitating adjustment. In: Craig A, Tran Y, eds. Psychological Dynamics Associated with Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: New Directions and Best Evidence. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc; 2009:71-87.
31. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Social Behav. 1980;21:219-239.
32. Duff J, Kennedy P. Spinal cord injury. In: Llewelyn L, Kennedy P, eds. Handbook of Clinical Health Psychology. Chechster: Wiley & Sons; 2003.