Speech outcome and velopharyngeal function in cleft palate: Comparison of Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis - Early results

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 23-32

  Chanchareonsook, Nattharee ^a   Whitehill, Tara L ^a   Samman, Nabil ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b Department of Maxillofacial Surgery ^*  (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cleft palate; Distraction osteogenesis; Osteotomy; Speech; Velopharyngeal insufficiency

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHINESE; CLEFT PALATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLA OSTEOTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PALATOPHARYNGEAL INCOMPETENCE; PHARYNX; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; CLEFT PALATE; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT; PALATE, SOFT; PHARYNX; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SPEECH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 33846245101     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/05-003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bell WH, Proffit WR, White RP. Surgical Correction of Dentofacial Deformities. Vols. 1 and 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1980.
2. Cedars MG, Linck DL, Chin M, Toth BA. Advancement of the midface using distraction techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:429-441.
3. Chanchareonsook N, Samman N, Whitehill TL. The effect of cranio-maxillofacial osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis on speech and velopharyngeal status: a critical review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43:477-487.
4. Cheung LK, Samman N, Hui E, Tideman H. The 3-dimensional stability of maxillary osteotomies in cleft patients with residual alveolar clefts. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;32:6-12.
5. Cohen SR, Rutrick R, Burstein FD. Distraction osteogenesis of the human craniofacial skeleton: initial experience with new distraction system. J Craniofac Surg. 1995;6:368-374.
6. Converse JM, Kawamoto HK, Wood-Smith D, Coccaro PJ. Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. Deformities of the Jaws. Vol. 3. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1977.
7. Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:184-188.
8. David DJ, Sells RK, Maegawa J. The effect of maxillary osteotomy on speech in cleft lip and palate patients. In: Transactions of the 8th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. Singapore: Stamford Press; 1997:655-659.
9. Epker BN, Wolford LM. Middle-third facial osteotomies: their use in the correction of congenital dentofacial and craniofacial deformities. J Oral Surg. 1976;34:324-342.
10. Golding-Kushner KJ, Argamaso RV, Cotton RT, Grames LM, Henningsson G, Jones DL, Karnell MP, Klaiman PG, Lewin ML, Marsh JL, McCall GN, McGrath CO, Muntz HR, Nevdahl MT, Rakoff SJ, Shprintzen RJ, Sidoti EJ, Vallino LD, Volk M, Williams WN, Witzel MA, Dixon-Wood V, Ysunza A, D'Antonio L, Isberg A, Pigott RW, Skolnick ML. Standardization for the reporting of nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from an International Working Group. Cleft Palate J. 1990;27:337-347.
11. Guyette TW, Polley JW, Figueroa A, Smith BE. Changes in speech following maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:199-205.
12. Haapanen M-L, Kalland M, Heliovaara A, Hukki J, Ranta R. Velopharyngeal function in cleft patients undergoing maxillary advancement. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1997;49:42-47.
13. Harada K, Ishii Y, Ishii M, Imaizumi H, Mibu M, Omura K. Effect of maxillary distraction osteogenesis on velopharyngeal function: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:538-543.
14. Hardin MA, Van Demark DR, Morris HL, Payne MM. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:346-351.
15. Hogan VM. A clarification of the surgical goals in cleft palate speech and the introduction of the lateral port control (l.p.c.) pharyngeal flap. Cleft Palate J. 1973;10:331-345.
16. Jaques B, Herzog G, Muller A, Hohlfeld J, Pasche P. Indications for combined orthodontic and surgical (orthognathic) treatments of dentofacial deformities in cleft lip and palate patients and their impact on velopharyngeal function. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1997;49:181-193.
17. Ko EW, Figueroa AA, Guyette TW, Polley JW, Law WR. Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up. J Craniofac Surg. 1999;10:312-320.
18. Kummer AW, Strife JL, Grau WH, Creaghead NA, Lee L. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary movement on articulation, resonance, and velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate J. 1989;26:193-199.
19. Maegawa J, Sells RK, David DJ. Speech changes after maxillary advancement in 40 cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg. 1998;9:177-182.
20. McCarthy JG, Coccaro PJ, Schwartz MD. Velopharyngeal function following maxillary advancement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:180-189.
21. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:1-8.
22. Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F, de la Paz Aguilar M, Barrera J. Maxillary distraction: aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip-palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:951-963.
23. Mühlbauer W. Distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of Apert's syndrome in infant. In: Transactions of the Scientific Meeting of the International Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Society. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1995.
24. Obwegeser HL. Surgical correction of small or retrodisplaced maxillae. The "dish-face" deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;43:351-365.
25. Okazaki K, Satoh K, Kato M, Iwanami M, Ohokubo F, Kobayashi K. Speech and velopharyngeal function following maxillary advancement in patients with cleft lip and palate. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30:304-311.
26. Quejada JG, Bell WH, Kawamura H, Zhang X. Skeletal stability after inferior maxillary positioning. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1987;2:67-74.
27. Schendel SA, Oeschlaeger M, Wolford LM, Epker BN. Velopharyngeal anatomy and maxillary advancement. J Maxillofac Surg. 1979;7:116-124.
28. Scheuerle J, Habal MB. Functional impact of distraction osteogenesis of the midface on expressive language development. J Craniofac Surg. 2001;12: 69-72.
29. Thongdee P, Samman N. Stability of maxillary surgical movement in unilateral cleft lip and palate with preceding alveolar bone grafting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42:664-674.
30. Vallino LD. Speech, velopharyngeal function, and hearing before and after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:1274-1281.
31. Watzke I, Turvey TA, Warren DW, Dalston R. Alterations in velopharyngeal function after maxillary advancement in cleft palate patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:685-689.
32. Whitehill TL. Nasalance measures in Cantonese-speaking women. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:119-125.
33. Whitehill TL, Cheung BWM, Samman N. Effect of dentofacial abnormality on the speech of Cantonese adults. Presented at 2nd Asia Pacific Conference on Speech, Language and Hearing; July 4-7, 2000; Queensland, Australia.
34. Witzel MA, Munro IR. Velopharyngeal insufficiency after maxillary advancement. Cleft Palate J. 1977;14:176-180.