Blood glucose testing and primary prevention of diabetes mellitus type 2 - Evaluation of the effect of evidence based patient information

BMC Public Health

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Genz, Jutta ^a   Haastert, Burkhard ^b   Meyer, Gabriele ^c   Steckelberg, Anke ^d   Müller, Hardy ^e   Verheyen, Frank ^e   Cole, Dennis ^e   Rathmann, Wolfgang ^a   Nowotny, Bettina ^a   Roden, Michael ^a   Giani, Guido ^a   Mielck, Andreas ^f   Ohmann, Christian ^a   Icks, Andrea ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Medistatistica ^*  (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^e WINEG   (Germany)

^f INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GERMANY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY PREVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGED; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 76849102440     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-15     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Evidence based patient information is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it. A Coulter, BMJ 1998 317 225 6 9677206
2. General Medical Council, Consent guidance: patients and doctors making decisions together London: GMC 2008
3. Kriterien für evidenzbasierte Patienteninformation. A Steckelberg B Berger S Köpke I Mühlhauser, Z rztl Fortb Qual Gesundh wes 2005
4. A Steckelberg G Meyer, Prädiabetes Früherkennung Halstenbek: Sabine Fischer Grafik 2008
5. Screening for Type2 Diabetes. American Diabetes Association (ADA), Diabetes Care 2004 27 Suppl 1 11 14
6. High prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in Southern Germany: target populations for efficient screening. The KORA Survey 2000. W Rathmann B Haastert A Icks H Löwel C Meisinger R Holle G Giani, Diabetologia 2003 46 182 189 12627316
7. Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in the Elderly German Population and the Effect of Clinical and Lifestyle Risk Factors: KORA S4/F4 Cohort Study. W Rathmann K Strassburger M Heier R Holle B Thorand G Giani C Meisinger, Diabetic Medicine 2009 26 1212 9 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02863.x 20002472
8. Within-trial cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Diabetes Care 2003 26 2518 2523 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2518 12941712
9. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. J Tuomilehto J Lindstrom JG Eriksson TT Valle H Hämäläinen P Ilanne-Parikka S Keinänen- Kiukaanniemi M Laakso A Louheranta M Rastas V Salminen M Uusitupa, N Engl J Med 2001 344 1343 50 10.1056/NEJM200105033441801 11333990
10. Früherkennung. http://www.diabetes-deutschland.de/frueherkennung. html
11. Gesünder unter 7. http://www.gesuender-unter-7.de
12. Prädiabetes - Das unerkannte Risiko auf dem Weg zum Typ-2-Diabetes. http://www.diabetesgate.de/diabetes/2004/praediabetes.php
13. F Faulbaum P Prüfer M Rexroth, Was ist eine gute Frage? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2009
14. U Frommann, Die Methode Lautes Denken 2005 http://www.e-teaching.org/ didaktik/qualitaet/usability/Lautes%20Denken-e-teaching-org.pdf
15. Gütekriterien der Messung: Reliabilität, Validität und Generalisierbarkeit. A Himme, Methodik der empirischen Forschung Wiesbaden: GWW Fachverlage, Albers A, Klapper D, Konradt U, Walter A, Wolf J, 2007 375 390 full-text
16. H Moosbrugger A Kelava, Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion Berlin - Heidelberg - New York: Springer 2007
17. F Saria, Pretestmethoden zur Evaluation von Fragebögen als Instrumente der Umfrageforschung 2006 http://www.uni-konstanz.de/struktur/fuf/ polfak/trappmann/saria06.pdf
18. How much do inpatient treated Diabetics know about their disease? H Blankenfeld A Mielck PM Schumm-Draeger T Siegmund, Gesundheitswesen 2006 68 557 565 10.1055/s-2006-926985 17039435
19. Development of the diabetes knowledge (DKN) scales: forms DKNA, DKNB, and DKNC. SM Dunn JM Bryson PL Hoskins JB Alford DJ Handelsman JR Turtle, Diabetes Care 1984 7 1 36 41 10.2337/diacare.7.1.36 6705664
20. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. JT Fitzgerald MM Funnell GE Hess PA Barr RM Anderson RG Hiss WK Davis, Diabetes Care 1998 21 5 706 10 10.2337/diacare.21.5.706 9589228
21. The validation of a diabetes patient knowledge test. GE Hess WK Davis, Diabetes Care 1983 6 6 591 6 10.2337/diacare.6.6.591 6360600
22. Relationship of diabetes-specific knowledge to self-management activities, ambulatory preventive care, and metabolic outcomes. SD Persell NL Keating MB Landrum BE Landon JZ Ayanian C Borbas E Guadagnoli, Preventive Medicine 2004 39 746 752 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.045 15351541
23. Relationship of functional health literacy to patients' knowledge of their chronic disease. MV Williams DW Baker RM Parker JR Nurss, Arch Intern Med 1998 158 166 172 10.1001/archinte.158.2.166 9448555
24. A measure of informed choice. T Marteau E Dormandy S Michie, Health Expectations 2001 4 99 108 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x 11359540
25. Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomised controlled trial. M Gattellari E Ward, J Med Screen 2003 10 27 39 10.1258/096914103321610789 12790313
26. Validation of client decision-making instruments in the context of psychiatry. H Bunn A O'Connor, Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 1996 28 3 13 27 8997937
27. Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale. AM O'Connor, Med Decis Making 1995 15 25 30 10.1177/0272989X9501500105 7898294
28. Evidence based medicine für Laien - Modellhafte Entwicklung eines Konzeptes zur Vermittlung von wissenschaftlichen Informationen zum Thema, Früherkennung von Brustkrebs mit Mammographie'. B Höldke, PhD thesis Hamburg University 2002
29. Wissenschaftliche Begleitung eines webbasierten interaktiven Systems zur Förderung der Partizipativen Entscheidungsfindung - der TK-Patientendialog. M Härter, Final report Freiburg University Medical Center 2009
30. W Ahrens BM Bellach KH Jöckel (Eds), Messung soziodemographischer Merkmale in der Epidemiologie RKI Schriften 1/98, München: MMV Medizin Verlag 1998 http://www.dgepi.de/infoboard/leitlinien.htm
31. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (Eds), 25 Jahre Leben in Deutschland - 25 Jahre Sozio-oekonomisches Panel Bonn/Berlin 2008 http://www.bmbf.de/pub/soep-leben-in-deutschland.pdf
32. Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. A Singh-Manoux NE Adler MG Marmot, Social Science & Medicine 2003 56 1321 1333 99 :343-351.
33. A Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis New York: John Wiley & Sons 2002 full-text
34. Patientenrelevante Endpunkte und "patient-reported outcomes" in klinischer Forschung und medizinischer Praxis. I Mühlhauser H Müller, Informiert und selbstbestimmt: Der mündige Bürger als mündiger Patient Baden-Baden: Nomos, Klusen N, Fliegarten A, Nebling T, 2009 34 65
35. Der Stellenwert von Patienteninformation und -kommunikation im Versorgungsmanagement der Gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung -Das WEB2.0 als Infrastruktur zur Mündigkeit in der Gesundheitsversorgung. H Müller, Achtung: Patient Online! Patient total vernetzt. Wie Internet, soziale Netzwerke und kommunikativer Strukturwandel den Gesundheitssektor transformieren Wiesbaden: Gabler, Koch C, 2010