Confirmation and explaining how possible

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 32-40

  Forber, Patrick ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confirmation; Evolutionary biology; Explanation; Modeling; Possibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS;

BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 76849096602     PISSN: 13698486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Beatty, J. (1995). The evolutionary contingency thesis. In G. Wolters, & J. G. Lennox (Eds.), Concepts, theories, and rationality in the biological sciences (pp. 45-81). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
2. Beatty J. Why do biologists argue like they do?. Philosophy of Science 64 Suppl. (1997) S432-S443
3. Brandon R. Adaptation and environment (1990), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
4. Crow J.F. Neutral models in molecular evolution. In: Nitecki M.H., and Hoffman A. (Eds). Neutral models in biology (1987), Oxford University Press, Oxford 11-22
5. Cutler D.J. Understanding the overdispersed molecular clock. Genetics 154 3 (2000) 1403-1417
6. Darwin, C. (1964). The origin of species (facsim. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (First published 1859)
7. Dawkins R. The blind watchmaker (1986), W. W. Norton and Company, New York
8. Dietrich M. The origins of the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Journal of the History of Biology 27 (1994) 21-59
9. Dietrich M. Monte Carlo experiments and the defense of diffusion models in molecular population genetics. Biology and Philosophy 11 (1996) 339-356
10. Dietrich M. Paradox and persuasion: Negotiating the place of molecular evolution within evolutionary biology. Journal of the History of Biology 31 (1998) 85-111
11. Dobzhansky T., and Pavlovsky O. An experimental study of the interaction between genetic drift and natural selection. Evolution 11 3 (1957) 311-319
12. Dray W. Law and explanation in history (1957), Oxford University Press, Oxford
13. Dray W. Philosophy of history. 2nd ed. (1993), Prentice Hall, Englewood, NJ
14. Earman J. Bayes or bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
15. Godfrey-Smith P. Darwinian populations and natural selection (2009), Oxford University Press, New York
16. Gould S.J. Wonderful life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history (1989), W. W. Norton, New York
17. Gould S.J., and Lewontin R.C. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B, Biological Sciences 205 (1979) 581-598
18. Griesemer J.R., and Wade M.J. Laboratory models, causal explanations and group selection. Biology and Philosophy 3 (1988) 67-96
19. Hagen J. Retelling experiments: H. B. D. Kettlewell's studies of industrial melanism in peppered moths. Biology and Philosophy 14 (1999) 39-54
20. Hempel C.G. Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science (1965), Free Press, New York
21. Howson C., and Urbach P. Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. 2nd ed. (1993), Open Court, Chicago
22. Hubby J.L., and Lewontin R.C. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. I. the number of alleles at different loci in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54 (1966) 577-594
23. Jackson F., and Pettit P. In defense of explanatory ecumenism. Economics and Philosophy 8 (1992) 1-21
24. Kettlewell H. Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 9 (1955) 323-342
25. Kettlewell H. Further selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 10 (1956) 287-301
26. Kimura M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in populations. Genetics 47 (1962) 713-719
27. Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217 (1968) 624-626
28. Kimura M., and Ohta T. Protein polymorphisms as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature 229 (1971) 467-469
29. King J.L., and Jukes T.H. Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164 (1969) 788-798
30. Kingsolver J.G., and Koehl M.A.R. Aerodynamics, thermoregulation, and the evolution of insect wings: Differential scaling and evolutionary change. Evolution 39 (1985) 488-504
31. Kreitman M. Methods to detect selection in populations with applications to humans. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 1 (2000) 539-559
32. Levi, I. (1988). Four themes in statistical explanation. In B. Skyrms, & W. L. Harper (Eds.), Causation in decision, belief change, and statistics, Vol. 2 (pp. 195-222). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
33. Levins R. The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist 54 (1966) 421-431
34. Levins R. A response to Orzack and Sober: Formal analysis and the fluidity of science. Quarterly Review of Biology 68 4 (1993) 547-555
35. Lewontin R.C. The genetic basis of evolutionary change (1974), Columbia University Press, New York
36. Lewontin R.C. Population genetics. In: Greenwood P., Harvery P., and Slatkin M. (Eds). Evolution: Essays in honour of John Maynard Smith (1985), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 3-18
37. Lewontin R.C. What do population geneticists know and how do they know it?. In: Creath R., and Maienschein J. (Eds). Biology and epistemology (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 191-214
38. Lewontin R.C., and Hubby J.L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations, II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54 (1966) 595-609
39. Mayr E. Change of genetic environment and evolution. In: Huxley J., Hardy A.C., and Ford E.B. (Eds). Evolution as a process (1954), Allen and Unwin, London 157-180
40. Mayr E. Animal species and evolution (1963), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
41. Mayr E. How to carry out the adaptationist program?. American Naturalist 121 3 (1983) 324-334
42. Millstein R. Distinguishing drift and selection empirically: 'The great snail debate' of the 1950s. Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2007) 339-367
43. Nilsson D.-E., and Pelger S. A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B, Biological Sciences 256 (1994) 53-58
44. O'Hara R.J. Homage to Clio, or, towards an historical philosophy for evolutionary biology. Systematic Zoology 37 2 (1988) 142-155
45. Ohta T., and Gillespie J.H. Development of neutral and nearly neutral theories. Theoretical Population Biology 49 (1996) 128-142
46. Orzack S.H., and Sober E. A critical assessment of Levins's the strategy of model building in population biology. Quarterly Review of Biology 68 4 (1993) 533-546
47. Plutynski A. Modeling evolution in theory and practice. Philosophy of Science 68 Suppl. (2001) S225-S236
48. Plutynski A. Explanation in classical population genetics. Philosophy of Science 71 (2004) 1201-1204
49. Plutynski A. Explanatory unification and the early synthesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2005) 595-609
50. Provine W.B. Sewall Wright and evolutionary biology (1986), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
51. Railton P. A deductive-nomological model of probabilistic explanation. Philosophy of Science 45 (1978) 206-226
52. Reiner R. Necessary conditions and explaining how-possibly. The Philosophical Quarterly 43 170 (1993) 58-69
53. Resnik D.B. How-possibly explanations in biology. Acta Biotheoretica 39 (1991) 141-149
54. Rudge D. Taking the peppered moths with a grain of salt. Biology and Philosophy 14 (1999) 9-37
55. Salmon W. Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world (1984), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
56. Salmon W. Four decades of scientific explanation (1989), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
57. Salmon, W. C. (1990). Rationality and objectivity in science or Tom Kuhn meets Tom Bayes. In W. Savage (Ed.), Scientific theories, Vol. 14 (pp. 175-204). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
58. Simpson G.G. Organisms and molecules in evolution. Science 146 3651 (1964) 1535-1538
59. Skipper R.A. The persistence of the R. A.Fisher-Sewall Wright controversy. Biology and Philosophy 17 (2002) 341-367
60. Sober E. The nature of selection (1984), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
61. Sober, E. (1990). Contrastive empiricism. In W. Savage (Ed.), Scientific theories, Vol. 14 (pp. 392-412). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
62. Sober E. Two uses of unification. In: Stadler F. (Ed). The Vienna Circle and logical empiricism: Re-evaluation and future prospects (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 205-216
63. Sterelny K. Explanatory pluralism in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 11 (1996) 193-214
64. Sterelny K., and Griffiths P.E. Sex and death: An introduction to philosophy of biology (1999), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
65. Suarez E., and Barahona A. The experimental roots of the neutral theory of molecular evolution. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18 (1996) 55-81
66. Van Fraassen B.C. The only necessity is verbal necessity. Journal of Philosophy 74 (1977) 71-85
67. Weisberg M. Robustness analysis. Philosophy of Science 73 (2006) 730-742
68. Wimsatt W.C. Robustness, reliability, and overdetermination. In: Brewer M., and Collins B. (Eds). Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (1981), Jossey-Boss, San Francisco 124-163
69. Wimsatt W.C. Using false models to elaborate constraints on processes: Blending inheritance in organic and cultural evolution. Philosophy of Science 69 Suppl. (2002) S12-S24
70. Woodward, J. (2009). Scientific explanation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-explanation/.
71. Zuckerkandl E., and Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V., and Vogel H. (Eds). Evolving genes and proteins (1965), Academic Press, New York 97-166