Against the odds. the open method of coordination as a selective amplifier for reforming belgian pension policies

EIOP European Integration Online Papers

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Vanhercke, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agenda setting; Belgium; Benchmarking; European social model; Europeanization; Governance; Ideas; Open coordination; Participation; Policy learning; Political science; Social policy; Soft law; Trade unions

Indexed keywords

EID: 76749134216     PISSN: 10275193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1695/2009016     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. AGE. 2008. What is the European Union doing in the field of social protection and social inclusion?, A Toolkit to improve civil dialogue in The Open Method of Coordination on Social Protection and Social Inclusion. The European Older People s Platform.
2. Amitsis, Gabriel, 2004. The boundaries between Directive 2003/41 and the OMC process on occupational welfare. Paper presented at the Public Seminar on Pensions at Risk, European Network for research on Supplementary Pensions, Leuven, Belgium, September 17, 2004.
3. Börzel, Tanja A. 2003. Shaping and Taking EU Policies: Member State Responses to Europeanization. Queen s papers on Europeanization, No. 2/2003.
4. Caporaso, James, Maria Green Cowles and Thomas Risse. 2001. Europeanization and Domestic Change: Introduction. In Transforming Europe, ed. Caporaso, James, Maria Green Cowles and Thomas Risse, 1-20. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
5. Commission of the European Communities. 1991. Communication from the Commission Supplementary social security schemes: the role of occupational pension schemes in the social protection of workers and their implications for freedom of movement, SEC (91) 1332 of 22 July 1991.
6. Commission of the European Communities and Council of the EU. 2003. Joint Report on Adequate and Sustainable Pensions by the Commission and the Council. Brussels, Document 7165/03 of 18 March 2003.
7. Council of the EU. 1999. Draft Report from the Council (ECOFIN) on the Broad Guidelines of the Economic Policies of the Member States and the Community, appended to the Presidency Conclusions of the Cologne European Council 3-4 June 1999. Doc 8586/99.
8. Council of the EU. 2000. Council Conclusions on the strengthening of cooperation for modernising and improving social protection. OJ [2000] C8/7.
9. Council of the EU. 2006. Joint Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion. Doc. 7294/06 of 13 March 2006.
10. Dawson, Mark, 2009. EU law transformed? Evaluating accountability and subsidiarity in the streamlined OMC for Social Inclusion and Social Protection. In What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research, ed. Sandra Kröger. European Integration online Papers, Special Issue 1, Vol. 13, Art. 8, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-008a.htm.
11. de la Porte, Caroline and Pedro Adão e Silva. 2007. The informal Council as an Institutionalised feature of the European policy-making landscape: Ideational Forum, Agenda-Setter or Policy-Decision Forum?. In Perspectives on Employment and Social Policy Coordination in The European Union, 145-163, Portuguese Presidency of the European Union, Ministry of Labour and Social Solidarity.
12. de la Porte, Caroline and Patricia Nanz. 2004. The OMC - A Deliberative-Democratic Mode of Governance? The Cases of Employment and Pensions. Journal of European Public Policy Vol. 11, No. 2: 267-288.
13. Eckardt, Martina. 2005. The open method of co-ordination on pensions: an economic analysis of its effects on pension reforms. Journal of European Social Policy Vol. 15, No. 3: 247-267.
14. EPC. 2001. Budgetary challenges posed by ageing populations: the impact on public spending on pensions, health and long-term care for the elderly and possible indicators of the long-term sustainability of public finances. Doc EPC/ECFIN/630-EN, Brussels: Economic Policy Committee.
15. Ervik, Rune. 2006. European Pension Policy Initiatives and National Reforms: Between Financial Sustainability and Adequacy. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies - Working Papers, No. 10-2006, http://hdl.handle.net/1956/2040 (accessed on October 16, 2009).
16. Esping-Andersen, Gosta et al. (eds.). 2002. Why we Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1996. After the golden age? Welfare state dilemmas in a global economy. In Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies,ed. Gosta Esping-Andersen, London: Sage.
18. ETUC. 2006. To bolster social cohesion, ETUC wants an ambitious and efficient OMC applied to social protection and social inclusion. Statement adopted by the ETUC Executive Committee, Brussels, 14-15 March 2006.
19. European Council, 2001. Göteborg European Council Presidency Conclusions, 15-16 June 2001, SN 200/1/01 REV1.
20. European Council. 2003. Brussels European Council, Presidency Conclusions, 20-21 March 2003. Document 8410/03 of 5 May 2003.
21. Featherstone, Kevin. 2005. Soft Co-ordination Meets Hard Politics: The European Union and Pension Reform in Greece. Journal of European Public Policy Vol. 12 No. 4: 733-750.
22. FERPA. 2005. FERPA s response to the questionnaire on applying the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) to pensions. Unpublished letter for the attention of DG Employment, Brussels: European Commission, 25 April 2005.
23. Fuchs, Rainer. 2003. Pension Policy Co-operation within the EU from a German point of view, paper presented at the National Seminar on Pension Strategy and Older Workers Participation in the Labour Market, Tallinn, 12 November 2003.
24. Hamel, Marie-Pierre and Bart Vanhercke. 2009. The OMC and Domestic Social Policymaking in Belgium and France: Window Dressing, One-Way Impact, or Reciprocal Influence?. In Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: the Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Labour Market and Social Welfare Reforms, ed. Heidenreich, Martin and Jonathan Zeitlin, 84-111. London:Routledge.
25. Hartlapp, Miriam, 2009. Learning about policy learning. Reflections on the European Employment Strategy. In What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research, ed. Sandra Kröger. European Integration online Papers, Special Issue 1, Vol. 13, Art. 7, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-007a.htm.
26. Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden, New Haven: Yale University Press.
27. Heidenreich, Martin and Jonathan Zeitlin (eds.). 2009. Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: the Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Labour Market and Social Welfare Reforms. London: Routledge.
28. Hemerijck, Anton and Ives Marx (2009) Continental Welfare at a Crossroads. The choice between activation and minimum income protection in Belgium and the Netherlands. In A long good-bye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe, ed. Bruno Palier. Amsterdam University Press, forthcoming.
29. Horvath, Anna, 2009. What kind of consensus? Conflicting notions of effectiveness within the Social Protection Committee. In What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research, ed. Sandra Kröger. European Integration online Papers, Special Issue 1, Vol. 13, Art. 17, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-017a.htm.
30. Jacquot, Sophie and Cornelia Woll. 2003. Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective, European Integration online Papers Vol. 7, No. 12, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2003-012a.htm (accessed October 16, 2009).
31. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.
32. Kröger, Sandra. 2009. The Open Method of Coordination: Underconceptualisation, overdetermination, de-politicisation and beyond. In What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research, ed. Sandra Kröger. European Integration online Papers, Special Issue 1, Vol. 13, Art. 5, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-005a.htm.
33. Leibfried, Stephan and Paul Pierson. 2000. Social Policy. Left to Courts and Markets?. In Policy-Making in the European Union, Fourth Edition, ed. Wallace, Helen and William Wallace, The New European Union Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Letzner, Peggy and Volker Schmitt. 2007. La mise en œuvre de la méthode ouverte de coordination dans le secteur de l assurance vieillesse en Allemagne: un processus d harmonisation, Retraite et Société No. 50: 234- 242.
35. Lodge, Martin. 2007. Comparing Non-Hierarchical Governance in Action: the Open Method of Co-
36. ordination in Pensions and Information Society, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 45 No. 2: 343-365.
37. López-Santana, Mariely, 2009. Having a Say and Acting: Assessing the effectiveness of the European Employment Strategy as an intra-governmental coordinative instrument. In What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research, ed. Sandra Kröger. European Integration online Papers, Special Issue 1, Vol. 13, Art. 15, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-015a.htm.
38. Natali, David. 2007a. Pensions OMC: Why did it emerge and how does it evolve? Paper presented at the Annual EUSA Conference, Montreal, May 2007.
39. Natali, David. 2007b. Pensions OMC s influence of national reforms. NewGov Working Paper 01/D47.
40. Natali, David and Caroline de la Porte. 2004. Questioning the Effectiveness of OMC Pensions: Does Europe Co-ordinate the EU s diverse Pension Systems? Working Paper, Brussels: Observatoire social européen.
41. Pfister, Thomas. 2009. Governing the knowledge society: Studying Lisbon as epistemic setting. In What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research, ed. Sandra Kröger. European Integration online Papers, Special Issue 1, Vol. 13, Art. 6, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-006a.htm.
42. Radulova, Elisavetta. 2007. Variations on Soft EU Governance: the Open Method(s) of Coordination. In Dynamics and Obstacles of European Governance, ed. De Bièvre, Dirk and Christine Neuhold, 3-27.
43. Reyniers, Philippe, Pierre-Paul Van Gehuchten and Bart Vanhercke. 2010. The unfulfilled potential of European social security law, in Belgium in Europe, Europe in Belgium. Shaping and taking EU social policies, ed. Bart Vanhercke et al. Brussels: Belgian Science Policy office, forthcoming.
44. SPC. 2006. Proposal for a Portfolio of Overarching Indicators and for the Streamlined Social Inclusion, Pensions, and Health Portfolios. Social Protection Committee, D(2006), 7 June 2006.
45. SPC and EPC. 2001. Quality and Viability of Pensions. Joint Report on Objectives and Working Methods in the Area of Pensions. Brussels: Social Protection Committee and Economic Policy Committee, 23 November 2001, Document 14098/01, SOC 469, ECOFIN 334.
46. SPC and Commission of the European Communities. 2007. Joint Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion 2007. Social Inclusion, Pensions, Healthcare and Long Term Care. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
47. Vandenbroucke, Frank. 2001. Open Co-ordination on Pensions and the Future of Europe s Social Model. Closing speech at the Conference Towards a New Architecture for Social Protection?, Leuven, 19-20 October, 2001.
48. Weishaupt, J. Timo. 2009. Money, votes or good ideas? Partisan politics and the effectiveness of the European Employment Strategy in Austria and Ireland. In What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research, ed. Sandra Kröger, European Integration online Papers, Special Issue 1, Vol. 13, Art. 14, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-014a.htm.
49. Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2005. The Open Method of Coordination in Action. Theoretical Promise, Empirical Realities, Reform Strategy. In The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action. The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, ed. Zeitlin, Jonathan and Philippe Pochet, with Lars Magnuson, 447-504. Brussels: P.I.E. -Peter Lang.