Governing the knowledge society: Studying lisbon as epistemic setting

EIOP European Integration Online Papers

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Pfister, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Discourse; Governance; Knowledge; Methodological issues; Open coordination; Policy analysis; Policy learning; Political science; Power analysis; Sociology

Indexed keywords

EID: 76749153270     PISSN: 10275193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1695/2009006     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Armstrong, Kenneth. 2005. Inclusive Governance? Civil Society and the Open Method of Coordination. In Civil Society and Legitimate European Governance, edited by S. Smismans. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2. Bell, Daniel. 1976. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: a Venture in Social Forecasting. Harmondsworth: Basic Books.
3. Callon, Michel. 1986. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Power, Action and Belief. A new Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by J. Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. Callon, Michel. 1995. Four Models for the Dynamics of Science. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
5. Carmel, Emma. 2005. Governance and the Constitution of a European Social. In Remaking Governance. Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere, edited by J. Newman. Bristol: Policy Press.
6. Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society (=The Information Age, Vol. I). Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Clarke, John. 2004. Changing Welfare, Changing States. New Directions in Social Policy. London: SAGE.
8. Cohen, Joshua, and Charles F. Sabel. 2003. Sovereignty and Solidarity: EU and US. In Governing Work and Welfare in the New Economy: European and American Experiments, edited by J. Zeitlin and D. M. Trubek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Dawson, Mark. 2009. EU law 'transformed'? Evaluating accountability and subsidiarity in the 'streamlined' OMC for Social Inclusion and Social Protection. In: Kröger, Sandra (ed.), 2009, What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research. European Integration Online Papers, Special Issue 1, 13 (8), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-008a.htm.
10. Drucker, Peter F. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. New York: HarperBusiness.
11. European Council. 2000. Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March. Presidency Conclusions.
12. Ferrera, Maurizio, and Stefano Sacchi. 2005. The Open Method of Co-ordination and National Institutional Capabilities: The Italian Case. In The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, edited by J. Zeitlin and P. Pochet. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
13. Flear, Mark. 2009. The Open Method of Coordination on health care after the Lisbon Strategy II: Towards a neoliberal framing? In: Kröger, Sandra (ed.), 2009, What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research. European Integration Online Papers, Special Issue 1, 13 (12), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-012a.htm.
14. Foucault, Michel. 1991. On Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality: with two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. N. Miller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Gerstenberg, Oliver, and Charles F. Sabel. 2002. Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. An Institutional Ideal for Europe? In Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, edited by C. Joerges and R. Dehousse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Haahr, Jens Henrik. 2004. Open Co-ordination as Advanced Liberal Government. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (2): 209-230.
17. Hacking, Ian. 1991. How should we do the History of Statistics? In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality: with two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. N. Miller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Hall, Peter. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275-296.
19. Horvath, Anna. 2009. What kind of consensus? Conflicting notions of effectiveness within the Social Protection Committee. In: Kröger, Sandra (ed.), 2009, What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research. European Integration Online Papers, Special Issue 1, 13 (17), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-017a.htm.
20. Jacobsson, Kerstin. 2004. Soft Regulation and the Subtle Transformation of States: the Case of EU Employment Policy. Journal of European Social Policy 14 (4): 355-370.
21. Jenson, Jane. 2007. The European Union's Citizenship Regime. Creating Norms and Building Practices. Comparative European Politics 5 (1): 53-69.
22. Jenson, Jane, and Denis Saint-Martin. 2006. Building Blocks for a New Social Architecture: The LEGO(TM) Paradigm of an Active Society Policy & Politics 34 (3): 429-451.
23. Kerber, Wolfgang, and Martina Eckardt. 2007. Policy Learning in Europe: the Open Method of Co-ordination and Laboratory Federalism. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (2): 227-247.
24. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1995. Laboratory Studies: The Cultural Approach to the Study of Science. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. J. Pinch. London: SAGE.
25. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Kröger, Sandra. 2006. When Learning Hits Politics or: Social Policy Coordination Left to the Administrations and the NGOs? European Integration Online Papers 10 (3), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2006-003a.htm (accessed on September 30, 2009).
27. Kröger, Sandra. 2007. The End of Democracy as we Know It? The Legitimacy Deficits of Bureaucratic Social Policy Governance. Journal of European Integration 29 (5): 565-582.
28. Kröger, Sandra. 2009. The Open Method of Coordination: Underconceptualisation, overdetermination, de-politicisation and beyond. In: Kröger, Sandra (ed.), 2009, What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research. European Integration Online Papers, Special Issue 1, 13 (5), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-005a.htm.
29. Latour, Bruno. 1986. The Powers of Association. In Power, Action and Belief, edited by J. Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Latour, Bruno, and Steven Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts 2. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32. Lynch, Michael. 1985. Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33. Lynch, Michael, and Steve Woolgar, eds. 1990. Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
34. Miller, Peter, and Nikolas Rose. 1990. Governing Economic Life. Economy and Society 19: 1-31.
35. Mosher, James, and David M. Trubek. 2003a. Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy. Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (1): 63-88.
36. Mosher, James, and David M. Trubek. 2003b. New Governance, Employment Policy, and the European Social Model. In Governing Work and Welfare in the New Economy: European and American Experiments, edited by J. Zeitlin and D. M. Trubek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Newman, Janet, ed. 2005. Remaking Governance. Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press.
38. Noaksson, Niklas, and Kerstin Jacobsson. 2003. The Production of Ideas and Expert Knowledge in OECD. The OECD Jobs Strategy in Contrast with the EU Employment Strategy. Score Rapportserie 2003 (7), http://www.score.su.se/pdfs/2003-7.pdf#search=%22score%20noaksson%20jacobsson%22 (accessed on October 15, 2009).
39. Pfister, Thomas. 2008. Mainstreamed away? Assessing the Gender Equality Dimension of the European Employment Strategy. Policy & Politics 36 (4): 521-538.
40. Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
41. Radulova, Elisavetta. 2009. The construction of EU's childcare policy through the Open Method of Coordination. In: Kröger, Sandra (ed.), 2009, What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research. European Integration Online Papers, Special Issue 1, 13 (15), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-015a.htm.
42. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practices. A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243-263.
43. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2003. Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken. Eine sozialtheoretische Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 32 (4): 282-301.
44. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2004. Die Reproduktion und die Subversion sozialer Praktiken. Zugleich ein Kommentar zu Pierre Bourdieu und Judith Butler. In Doing Culture. Neue Positionen zum Verhältnis von Kultur und sozialer Praxis,, edited by K. H. Hörning and J. Reuter. Bielefeld: Transcript.
45. Rose, Nikolas, and Peter Miller. 1992. Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 172-205.
46. Sabel, Charles F., and Jonathan Zeitlin. 2007. Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) No. C-07-02, http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-07-02.pdf (accessed on September 5, 2009).
47. Schatzki, Theodore R. 2001. Practice Mind-ed Orders. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina and E. Von Savigny. London: Routledge.
48. Schatzki, Theodore R., Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike Von Savigny, eds. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
49. Serrano Pascual, Amparo. 2007. Reshaping Welfare States: Activation Regimes in Europe. In Reshaping Welfare States and Activation Regimes in Europe, edited by A. Serrano Pascual and L. Magnusson. Brussels:
50. P. I. E. Peter Lang. Serrano Pascual, Amparo, and Eduardo Crespo Suarez. 2007a. The Government of Activation Policies by EU Institutions. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 27 (9-10): 376-386.
51. Serrano Pascual, Amparo, and Eduardo Crespo Suarez. 2007b. Political Production of Individualised Subjects in the Paradoxical Discourse of the EU Institutions. In Making it Personal. Individualising Activation Services in the EU, edited by R. van Berkel and B. Valkenburg. Bristol: Policy Press.
52. Serrano Pascual, Amparo, and Lars Magnusson, eds. 2007. Reshaping Welfare States and Activation Regimes in Europe. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
53. Shore, Cris. 2006. 'Government Without Statehood'? Anthropological Perspectives on Governance and Sovereignty in the European Union. European Law Journal 12 (6): 709-724.
54. Shore, Cris. 2009. "European Governance, or Governmentality? Reflections on the EU's System of Government. Constitutionalism Web-Papers. ConWEB (3/2009), http://www.wiso.unihamburg.de/fileadmin/sowi/conweb/conweb_wiener/2009/conweb_3_2009.pdf (accessed on September 5, 2009).
55. Stehr, Nico. 1994. Knowledge Societies. London: Sage.
56. van Berkel, Rik, and Iver Hornemann Møller, eds. 2002. Active Social Policies in the EU. Inclusion through Participation? Bristol: Policy Press.
57. van Berkel, Rik, and Ben Valkenburg, eds. 2007. Making it Personal. Individualising Activation Services in the EU. Bristol: Policy Press.
58. Walters, William. 2004. Some Critical Notes on Governance. Studies in Political Economy 73 (spring/summer): 27-46.
59. Walters, William, and Jens Henrik Haahr. 2005. Governing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration. Oxford: Routledge.
60. Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2005a. Conclusion: The Open Method of Coordination in Action: Theoretical Promise, Empirical Realities, Reform Strategy. In The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, edited by J. Zeitlin and P. Pochet. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
61. Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2005b. Introduction: The Open Method of Coordination in Action. In The Open Method of Co-ordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, edited by J. Zeitlin and P. Pochet. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
62. Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2005c. Social Europe and Experimentalist Governance: Towards a New Constitutional Compromise? European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) No. C-05-04, http://www.connexnetwork.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-05-04.pdf (accessed on September 5, 2009).