Evaluation of signs and markings for partial continuous flow intersection

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2138, 2009, Pages 66-74

  Inman, Vaughan W ^a  

^a SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERSECTIONS; ROAD AND STREET MARKINGS; STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRAFFIC SIGNALS;

CONFLICT POINTS; CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS; DRIVING SIMULATOR STUDY; LARGE VOLUMES; LEFT TURN MOVEMENTS; LEFT TURNS; POTENTIAL CONFLICT; ROAD JUNCTION; ROAD MARKING; TRAFFIC FLOW;

NAVIGATION;

EID: 76749129461     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2138-10     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Reid, J. D., and J. E. Hummer. Travel Time Comparisons Between Seven Unconventional Arterial Intersection Designs. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1751, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 56-66.
2. Chick, M. J. The Displaced Right Turn Junction. Thesis. University of Leeds, United Kingdom, 2001.
3. El Esawey, M., and T. Sayed. Comparison of Two Unconventional Intersection Schemes: Crossover Displaced Left-Turn and Upstream Signalized Crossover Intersections. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.2023, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 10-19.
4. Jagannathan, R. Evaluation of Crossover Displaced Left-turn (XDL) Intersections and Real-Time Signal Control Strategies with Artificial Intelligence Techniques. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Falls Church, Va., 2003.
5. Simodynes, T., T. Welch, and M. Kuntemeyer. Effects of Reducing Conflict Points on Reducing Accidents (abstract only). Presented at 3rd National Access Management Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 1998, p. 141.
6. Dadic, I., D. Badanjak, A. Scukanec, and P. Brlek. Dependence of Conflict Intensity Between Traffic Flows and Traffic Safety. Traffic Safety on Two Continents, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping, Sweden, 2000, pp. 217-226.
7. Hydén, C. The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, 1987.
8. Gettman, D., and L. Head. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
9. Davis, G. A., J. Hourdos, and H. Xiong. Outline of Causal Theory of Traffic Conflicts and Collisions. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
10. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways-2003. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.