New housing construction in Phoenix: Evidence of "new suburbanism"?

Cities

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 77-86

  Atkinson Palombo, Carol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Arizona; Density; GIS; Infill; Urban development

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; DECENTRALIZATION; METROPOLITAN AREA; NEIGHBORHOOD; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; SUBURBANIZATION; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN PLANNING;

ARIZONA; PHOENIX; UNITED STATES;

EID: 76749124198     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2009.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Agyeman J. Alternative urban futures: Planning for sustainable development in cities throughout the world. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (2005) 225-226
2. Alexander D., and Tomalty R. Smart growth and sustainable development: challenges, solutions and policy directions. Local Environment 7 (2002) 397-409
3. APA. Growhing Smart Legislative Guidebook: Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change (1997), American Planning Association
4. American Planning Association (APA) (2007). http://myapa.planning.org/growingsmart/States/Arizona.htm Date last accessed: 12/19/2008.
5. Arizona Department of Economic Security (2008). Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2008, Phoenix, Arizona.
6. Atkinson-Palombo C., and Heidcamp C.P. A leading indicator of displacement. Urban Geography (2008)
7. Baldassare M. Trouble in Paradise: The suburban transformation in America (1988), Columbia University Press, New York
8. Banister D., Watson S., and Wood C. Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form. Environment and Planning B-Planning and Design 24 (1997) 125-143
9. Bengston D.N., Fletcher J.O., and Nelson K.C. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2004) 271-286
10. Berke P.R. Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century. Journal of Planning Literature 17 (2002) 21-36
11. Berke P.R., and Conroy M.M. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (2000) 21-33
12. Berke P.R., and French S.P. The influence of state planning mandates on local-plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research 13 (1994) 237-250
13. Blassingame L. Sustainable cities: Oxymoron, Utopia, or inevitability?. Social Science Journal 35 (1998) 1-13
14. Blumenfeld H. The tidal wave of metropolitan expansion. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 10 (1954) 3-14
15. Bourne L.S. Reurbanization, uneven urban development, and the debate on new urban forms. Urban Geography 17 (1996) 690-713
16. Bunting T., Filion P., and Priston H. Density gradients in Canadian metropolitan regions, 1971-96: Differential patterns of central area and suburban growth and change. Urban Studies 39 (2002) 2531-2552
17. Calthorpe P. Foreword. In: Dittmar H., and Ohland G. (Eds). The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development (2004), Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London
18. Carruthers J.I. The impacts of state growth management programmes: a comparative analysis. Urban Studies 39 (2002) 1959-1982
19. Danielsen K., Lang R., and Fulton W. Retracting suburbia: smart growth and the future of housing. Housing Policy Debate 10 (1999) 513-540
20. Danielsen K.A., Lang R.E., and Fulton W. Retracting suburbia: smart growth and the future of housing. Housing Policy Debate 10 (1999) 513-540
21. Downs A. New Visions for Metropolitan America (1994), Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
22. Duaney A., Plater-Zyberk E., and Speck J. Suburban Nation: The Rise and Sprawl of the American Dream (2001), North Point Press
23. Fainstein S.S. Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25 (2005) 121-130
24. Fannie-Mae-Foundation. Downtown housing as an urban redevelopment tool: hope or hype (panel discussion). Housing Policy Debate 10 (1997) 477-505
25. Farris J.T. The barriers to using urban infill development to achieve smart growth. Housing Policy Debate 12 (2001) 1-30
26. Fernandez L.E., Brown D.G., Marans R.W., and Nassauer J.I. Characterizing location preferences in an exurban population: implications for agent-based modeling. Environment and Planning B-Planning and Design 32 (2005) 799-820
27. Filion P. Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: what difference do they make?. Environment and Planning A 33 (2001) 141-160
28. Fillion P. Towards smart growth? The difficult implementation of alternatives to urban dispersion. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 12 (2003) 48-70
29. Filion P., Bunting T., and Warriner K. The entrenchment of urban dispersion: residential preferences and location patterns in the dispersed city. Urban Studies 36 (1999) 1317-1347
30. Frey W.H. Metropolitan America: beyond the transition. Population Bulletin 45 (1990) 1-48
31. Fujita M. Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
32. Gale D.E. 8 State-sponsored growth management programs - a comparative-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (1992) 425-439
33. Galster G., Hanson R., Ratcliffe M.R., Wolman H., Coleman S., and Freihage J. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate 12 (2001) 681-717
34. Glaeser E.L. Urban growth in the 1990's: Is city living back?. Journal of Regional Science 43 (2003) 139-166
35. Gober P., and Burns E.K. The size and shape of Phoenix's urban fringe. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 (2002) 379-390
36. Goodman J. The changing demography of multifamily rental housing. Housing Policy Debate 10 (1999) 31-57
37. Handy S. Smart growth and the transportation b - land use connection: What does the research tell us?. International Regional Science Review 28 (2005) 146-167
38. Hart J.F. The perimetropolitan bow wave. Geographical Review 81 (1991) 35-51
39. Haughton G., and Hunter C. Sustainable Cities (2003), Routledge, London & New York
40. Knaap G., and Talen E. New urbanism and smart growth: a few words from the academy. International Regional Science Review 28 (2005) 107-118
41. Kotkin J. The new suburbanism: a realist's guide to the American future. The Planning Center (2005)
42. Lang R., and LeFurgy J. Boomburb "buildout" - the future of development in large, fast-growing suburbs. Urban Affairs Review 42 (2007) 533-552
43. Lang R.E., Blakely E.J., and Gough M.Z. Keys to the new metropolis. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (2005) 381-391
44. Lang R.E., Hughes J.W., and Danielsen K.A. Targeting the suburban urbanites: marketing central-city housing. Housing Policy Debate 8 (1997) 437-470
45. Lopez R., and Hynes H.P. Sprawl in the 1990s - measurement, distribution, and trends. Urban Affairs Review 38 (2003) 325-355
46. Maricopa County Assessor's Office (2007). GIS dataset of parcels and sales affidavits.
47. MAG. Growing Smarter Implementation Project Best Practices: Transit-Oriented Development (2003), Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, Arizona
48. MAG (2007). Regional Transportation Plan. Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, Arizona.
49. Mikelbank B.A. A Typology of U.S. Suburban Places. Housing Policy Debate 15 (2004) 935-963
50. Muth R.F. Models of land-use, housing, and rent - an evaluation. Journal of Regional Science 25 (1985) 593-606
51. NAHB, N. A. o. H. B. 1999. Smart Growth. Washington, DC.
52. Newman P., and Kenworth J. Sustainability and Cities (1999), Island Press, Washington, DC, Covelo, California
53. Orfield M. American Metropolitics - The New Suburban Reality (2002), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
54. Pendall R. The limitless city: a primer on the urban sprawl debate. Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (2003) 99
55. Phe H.H., and Wakely P. Status, quality and the other trade-off: towards a new theory of urban residential location. Urban Studies 37 (2000) 7-35
56. Rosenbloom S. The Mobility Needs of Older Americans: Implications for Transportation Reauthorization (2003), Center for Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
57. Rydin Y. Sustainable development and the role of land use planning. Area 27 (1995) 369-377
58. Sanchez T.W., and Dawkins C.J. Distinguishing city and suburban movers: evidence from the American housing survey. Housing Policy Debate 12 (2001) 607-631
59. Squires G. Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Responses (2002), The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC
60. Suchman D., and Sowell M.B. Developing Infill Housing in Inner-City Neighborhoods (1997), Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC
61. Taylor P.J., and Lang R.E. The shock of the new: 100 concepts describing recent urban change. Environment & Planning A 36 (2004) 951-958
62. TCRP. The role of transit in creating livable metropolitan communities. Project for Public Spaces (1997), Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC
63. TCRP (2004) Transit-oriented development in the United States: experiences, challenges, and prospects. In Research Results Digest. Washington, DC: Transit-Cooperative Research Program.
64. Tsai Y.H. Quantifying urban form: compactness versus 'Sprawl'. Urban Studies 42 (2005) 141-161
65. ULI (1999) Smart Growth: Myth and Fact. Washington, DC
66. ULI. Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses (2002), Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC
67. Weitz J.J. From sprawl to smart growth: successful legal, planning, and environmental systems. Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (2001) 112-113
68. Wolman H., Galster G., Hanson R., Ratcliffe M., Furdell K., and Sarzynski A. The fundamental challenge in measuring sprawl: Which land should be considered?. Professional Geographer 57 (2005) 94-105