An empirical examination of application frameworks success based on technology acceptance model

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 574-584

  Polančič, Gregor ^a   Heričko, Marjan ^a   Rozman, Ivan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Application frameworks; Information system success; Post adoption behavior; Structural equation models; Survey; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION FRAMEWORKS; INFORMATION SYSTEM SUCCESS; POST-ADOPTION BEHAVIOR; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 76749099199     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.10.036     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anderson J.C., and Gerbing D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice - A Review and Recommended 2-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin 3 (1988) 411-423
2. Avlonitis G.J., and Panagopoulos N.G. Antecedents and consequences of CRM technology acceptance in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management 4 (2005) 355-368
3. Batory, D., Cardone, R., Smaragdakis, Y., 2000. Object-Oriented Frameworks and Product Lines. In: Donohoe, P. (Ed.), First Software Product Line Conference, pp. 227-247.
4. Bockle G., Clements P., McGregor J.D., Muthig D., and Schmid K. Calculating ROI for software product lines. IEEE Software 21 3 (2004) 23-31 Available from: ISI: 000220988700010
5. Booch G. Design an application framework. DR Dobbs Journal 2 (1994) 24-32
6. Bosch J., Molin P., Mattsson M., and Bengtsson P. Object-Oriented Frameworks - Problems and Experiences. In: Fayad, Schmidt, and Johnson (Eds). Building Application Frameworks: Object Oriented Foundations of Framework Design (1999), Wiley and Sons
7. Churchill G.A. Paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 1 (1979) 64-73
8. Cunningham H.C., Liu Y., and Zhang C.H. Using classic problems to teach Java framework design. Science of Computer Programming 59 1-2 (2006) 147-169 Available from: ISI: 000233946500010
9. Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance Of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 318-331. Aavailable from: http://business.clemson.edu/ISE/html/perceived_usefulness__perceive.html.
10. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User Acceptance of Computer-Technology - A Comparison of 2 Theoretical-Models. Management Science 8 (1989) 982-1003 Available from: ISI: A1989AL89000005
11. Dishaw M.T., and Strong D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information and Management 1 (1999) 9-21 Available from: ISI: 000080707400002
12. Fayad M., and Hamu D. Enterprise frameworks: guidelines for selection. ACM Computing Survey 1 (2000) 4
13. Fornell C., and Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1 (1981) 39-50
14. Frakes W.B., and Kang K. Software reuse research: status and future. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 7 (2005) 529-536
15. Froehlich G., Hoover J., Liu L., and Sorenson P. Designing object-oriented frameworks. CRC Handbook of Object Technology (1998), CRC Press
16. Gefen D., Straub D.W., and Bordeau M.-C. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research and Practice. Communications of AIS 7 (2000) 1-70
17. Goodhue D.L., and Thompson R.L. Task-Technology Fit and Individual-Performance. MIS Quarterly 2 (1995) 213-236 Available from: ISI: A1995RH14500005
18. Hong S.J., Thong J.Y.L., and Tam K.Y. Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems 3 (2006) 1819-1834
19. Johnson R.E. Documenting frameworks using patterns. Sigplan Notices 10 (1992) 63-76 Available from: ISI: A1992JU12100006
20. Johnson R.E. J2EE development frameworks. Computer 1 (2005) 107-110 Available from: ISI: 000226193800020
21. Johnson R.E., and Foote B. Designing Reusable Classes. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 2 (1988) 22-30 Available from: ISI: A1988Q223800003
22. King W.R., and He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 6 (2006) 740-755
23. Landin, N., Niklasson, A., 1995. Development of Object-Oriented Frameworks. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, Department of Communication Systems.
24. Lederer A.L., Maupin D.J., Sena M.P., and Zhuang Y. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems 3 (2000) 269-282
25. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 3 (2003) 191-204 Available from: ISI: 000180179200005
26. Mamrak S.A., and Sinha S. A case study: productivity and quality gains using an object-oriented framework. Software-Practice and Experience 6 (1999) 501-518 Available from: ISI: 000080323300001
27. Manolescu D., Noble J., and Voelter M. Patterns for Successful Object-oriented Framework Development. Pattern Languages of Program Design 5. first ed. (2006), Addison-Wesley Professional 401-431
28. Mattsson M. Effort distribution in a six year industrial application framework project. IEEE Computer Society (1999) 326-334
29. Mattsson M. Evolution and Composition of Object-Oriented Frameworks (2000), Department of Software Engineering and Computer Science - University of Karlskrona/Ronneby
30. McBurney D.H., and White T.L. Research Methods. sixth ed. (2003), Wadsworth Publishing
31. Meier, P., 1998. Critical Success Factors of Object Oriented Frameworks. In: STJA 98, pp. 1-10.
32. Mellarkod V., Appan R., Jones D.R., and Sherif K. A multi-level analysis of factors affecting software developers' intention to reuse software assets: an empirical investigation. Information and Management 7 (2007) 613-625
33. Moore G.C., and Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems research 3 (1991) 192-222
34. Morisio M., Ezran M., and Tully C. Success and failure factors in software reuse. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 4 (2002) 340-357 Available from: ISI: 000174814100002
35. Morisio M., Romano D., and Stamelos I. Quality, productivity, and learning in framework-based development: an exploratory case study. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 9 (2002) 876-888 Available from: ISI: 000177805300006
36. Moser S., and Nierstrasz O. The effect of object-oriented frameworks on developer productivity. Computer 9 (1996) 45-52 Available from: ISI: A1996VF54200012
37. Roberts D., and Johnson R. Patterns for evolving frameworks. Pattern languages of program design 3 (1997), Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc. 471-486
38. Saga V.L., and Zmud R.W. The nature and determinants of it acceptance, routinization, and infusion. Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology 45 (1994) 67-86
39. Sangdon, L., Hansuk, C., Youngjong, Y., Sangduck, L., 1999. Storage and management of object-oriented frameworks. In: International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 762-767.
40. Seddon P.B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 3 (1997) 240-253 Available from: ISI: A1997YA62700002
41. Sharp J.H. Development, extension, and application: a review of the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Education Journal 9 (2007) 1-9 (Accessed 2007)
42. Shaw M. Prospects for An Engineering Discipline of Software. IEEE Software 6 (1990) 15-24 Available from: ISI: A1990EE94200004
43. Srinivasan, S., 1999. Design patterns in object-oriented frameworks. Computer 32(2), 24-+. Available from: ISI: 000078322200016.
44. Tonella P., Torchiano M., Du Bois B., and Systa T. Empirical studies in reverse engineering: state of the art and future trends. Empirical Software Engineering 5 (2007) 551-571
45. van Gurp J., and Bosch J. Design, implementation and evolution of object oriented frameworks: concepts and guidelines. Software-Practice and Experience 3 (2001) 277-300 Available from: ISI: 000167468300004
46. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2 (2000) 186-204 Available from: ISI: 000086130700002
47. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 3 (2003) 425-478