Saliency-based image processing for retinal prostheses

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Parikh, N ^a   Itti, L ^b   Weiland, J ^b  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM MODEL; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; EXECUTION SPEED; HUMAN SUBJECTS; IMAGE FRAMES; IMPORTANT OBJECT; PARALLEL STREAMS; RETINAL PROSTHESIS; SALIENCY DETECTION; SALIENT REGIONS; TEXAS INSTRUMENTS; WEARABLE SYSTEMS;

DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS; IMAGE PROCESSING; OPHTHALMOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; WEARABLE COMPUTERS;

PROSTHETICS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; GAZE; IMAGE PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RETINAL PROSTHESIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRODE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; OCULOGRAPHY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY; VISION;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; TIME FACTORS; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 76649105429     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/1/016006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Margalit E and Sadda S R 2003 Retinal and optic nerve diseases Artif. Organs 27 963-74
2. Kolb H, Fernandez E and Nelson R 2002 Webvision: The Organization of the Retina and the Visual System
3. de Balthasar C et al 2008 Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49 2303-14
4. Yanai D et al 2007 Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa Am. J. Ophthalmol. 143 820-7
5. Gekeler F, Sachs H, Szurman P, Guelicher D, Wilke R, Reinert S, Zrenner E, Bartz-Schmidt K and Besch D 2008 Surgical procedure for subretinal implants with external connections: the extra-ocular surgery in eight patients ARVO 2008 Annual Meeting ARVO Abstract-4049
6. Humayun M S 2009 Preliminary results from Argus II Feasibility study: s 60 electrode epiretinal prosthesis ARVO 2009 Annual Meeting ARVO Abstract 4744
7. Dagnelie G 2008 Psychophysical evaluation for visual prosthesis Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10 339-68
8. Asher A et al 2007 Image processing for a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 54 993-1004
9. Hallum L E, Cloherty S L and Lovell N H 2008 Image analysis for microelectronic retinal prosthesis IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55 344-6
10. Boyle J R, Maeder A J and Boles W W 2008 Region-of-interest processing for electronic visual prosthesis J. Electron. Imaging 17 013002
11. Itti L, Koch C and Niebur E 1998 A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 20 6
12. Itti L 2000 Models of bottom-up and top-down visual attention PhD Thesis California Institute of Technology, Pasadena p 216
13. Itti L and Koch C 2000 A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention Vis. Res. 40 1489-506
14. Itti L and Koch C 2001 Computational modelling of visual attention Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 194-203
15. Itti L and Koch C 2001 Feature combination strategies for saliency-based visual attention systems J. Electron. Imaging 10 161-9
16. Kandel R, Schwartz J and Jessel T 2000 Principles of Neural Science 4th edn (New York: McGraw-Hill)
17. Wolfe J M, Cave K R and Franzel S L 1989 Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15 419-33
18. Wolfe J M 1994 Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1 202-38
19. Koch C and Ullman S 1985 Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry Hum. Neurobiol. 4 219-27
20. Frintrop S 2005 VOCUS: A Visual Attention System for Object Detection and Goal-Directed Search (Germany: University of Bonn)
21. Greenspan H, Belongie S, Goodman R, Perona P, Rakshit S and Anderson C H 1994 Overcomplete steerable pyramid filters and rotation invariance IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Seattle, Washington)
22. Burt P J and Adelson E H 1983 The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code IEEE Trans. Commun. 31 532-40
23. Adelson E H, Anderson C H, Bergen J R, Burt P J and Ogden J M 1984 Pyramid methods in image processing RCA Engineer 29 pp 33-41
24. Texas Instruments, TMS320DM642 Video/Imaging Fixed-Point Digital Signal Processor (Rev. L) - ref-separator.
25. Itti L 2005 Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes Vis. Cogn. 12 1093-123
26. Peters R J, Iyer A, Itti L and Koch C 2005 Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images Vis. Res 45 2397-416
27. Tatler B W 2007 The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions J. Vis. 7 ((4)) 1-17
28. Walther D and Koch C 2006 Modeling attention to salient proto-objects Neural Netw. 19 1395-407
29. Frintrop S, Backer G and Rome E 2005 Goal-directed search with a top-down modulated computational attention system Proc. Ann. Meeting of the German Association for Pattern Recognition (DAGM'05) (Wien, Austria)
30. Walther D 2006 Interactions of visual attention and object recognition: computational modeling, algorithms, and psychophysics PhD Thesis California Institute of Technology