Artificial intelligence for diagnostic purposes: Principles, procedures and limitations

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 159-165

  Cleophas, Ton J ^a   Cleophas, Toine F ^b  

^a European College of Pharmaceutical Medicine   (France)

^b Damen Shipyards ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; Back propagation; Diagnostic methods; Haycock equation; Multilayer perceptron analysis; Neural networks; Regression analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BACK PROPAGATION; BODY HEIGHT; BODY SURFACE; BODY WEIGHT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 76649087003     PISSN: 14346621     EISSN: 14374331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.045     Document Type: Short Survey

References (40)

1. WWW.SPSS.COM.
2. Stergiou C, Siganos D. Neural networks. www.doc.ic.ac.uk.
3. Andrew AM. Work of Warren McCulloch. Kybernetes 2004; 33:141-146
4. Rosenblatt F. Principles of neurodynamics: perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms. NY, USA: Spartan Books, 1962.
5. Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. AIM- 306, Cambridge MA, USA: Technical Report Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1974.
6. Rumbelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 1986;323:533-536
7. Simpson JH, McArdle C, Pauson AW, Hume P, Turkes A, Griffiths K. A non-invasive test for the pre-cancerous breast. Eur J Cancer 1995;31A:1768-1772
8. Naguib RN, Adams AE, Horne CH, Angus B, Sherbet GV, Lennard TW. The detection of nodal metastasis in breast cancer using neural networks. Physiol Meas 1996;17:297-303.
9. Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Mango LJ, Kelly D, Acosta D, Cason Z, et al. Evaluation of PAPNET testing as an ancillary tool to clarify the status of the atypical cervical smear. Mod Pathol 1997;10:564-567
10. Mango LJ, Valente PT. Neural networks assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. Acta Cytol 1998;42:227-232
11. Doornewaard H, Van der Schouw YT, Van der Graaf Y, Bos AB, Habbema JD, Van den Tweel JG. The diagnostic value of computer assisted primary smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study. Mod Pathol 1999;12:995-1000.
12. Prismatic Project Management Team. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. Lancet 1999;353:1381-1385
13. Finne P, Finne R, Auvinen A, Juusela H, Aro J, Maattanen L, et al. Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy in screen positive men by a multilayer perceptron network. Urology 2000; 56:418-422
14. Gamito EJ, Stone NN, Batuello JT, Crawford ED. Use of artificial neural networks in the clinical staging of prostate cancer. Tech Urol 2000;6:60-63
15. Bugliosi R, Tribalto M, Avvisati G, Boccardoro M, De Martinis C, Friera R, et al. Classification of patients affected by multiple myeloma using neural network software. Eur J Haematol 1994; 52:182-183
16. Kothari R, Cualing H, Balachander T. Neural network analysis of flow cytometry immunophenotype data. IEEE Biomed Eng 1996;43:803-810 (Pubitemid 126768564)
17. Glas JO, Reddick WE. Hybrid artificial neural network segmentation and classification of dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of osteosarcoma. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16: 1075-1083
18. Bryce TJ, Dewhirst MW, Floyd CE, Hars V, Brizel DM. Artificial neural networks of survival in patients treated with irradiation with and without concurrent chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;41:339-345
19. Stock A, Rogers MS, Li A, Chang AM. Use of neural networks for hypothesis generation in fetal surveillance. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1994;8:533-548
20. Si Y, Gotman J, Pasupathy A, Flanagan D, Rosenblatt B, Gottesman R. An expert system for EEG monitoring in the pediatric intensive care. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;106:488-500.
21. Zernikow B, Holtmannspotter K, Michel E, Theilhaber M, Pielemeier W, Hennecke KH. Artificial neural network for predicting intracranial haemorrhage in preterm neonates. Acta Paediatr 1998;87:969-975 (Pubitemid 28439913)
22. Zernikow B, Holtmannspotter K, Michel E, Hornschuh F, Groote K, Hennecke KH. Predicting length of stay in preterm neonates. Eur J Pediatr 1999;158:59-62.
23. Eftekbar B, Mohammad K, Ardebilli HE, Ghodsi M, Ketabchi E. Comparison of artificial neural network and regression models for prediction of mortality in head trauma based on clinical data. BMC Med Inform Decis Making 2005;5:3-9.
24. Selker HP, Griffith JL, Patil S, Long WJ, D'Agostino RB. A comparison of performance of mathematical predictive methods for medical diagnosis: identifying acute cardiac ischemia among emergency department patients. J Investig Med 1995; 43:468-476
25. Baxt WG, Skora J. Prospective validation of artificial neural network trained to identify acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1996;347:12-15
26. Ellenius J, Groth T, Lindahl B. Neural network of biochemical markers for early assessment of acute myocardial infarction. Stud Health Technol Inform 1997;43:382-385
27. Goodenday LS, Cios KJ, Shin L. Identifying coronary stenosis using an image recognition neural network. IEEE Eng Med Bio Mag 1997;16:139-144
28. Polak MJ, Zhou SH, Rautaharju PM, Armstrong WW, Chaitman BR. Using automated analysis of resting twelve lead ECG to identify patients at risk of developing transient myocardial iscaemia. Physiol Meas 1997;18:317-325
29. Lindahl D, Toft J, Hesse B, Palmer J, Ali S, Lundin A, et al. Scandinavian test of artificial neural network for classification of myocardial perfusion images. Clin Physiol 2000;20:253-261
30. Patil N, Smith TJ. Neural network analysis speeds disease risk predictions, innovative clinical models transform cardiovascular assessment algorithms. Scientific Computing 2009; Rockaway NJ 07866, www. scientificcomputing.com.
31. Queralto JM, Torres J, Guinot M. Neural networks for the biochemical prediction of bone mass. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37:831-838
32. Papik K, Molnar B, Fedorczak P, Schaefer R, Lang F, Sreter L, et al. Automated prozone effect detection in ferritin homogenous assays using neural networks. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999; 37:471-476
33. Mitchell D, Strydom NB, Van Graan CH, Van der Walt H. Human surface area: comparison of the du Bois formula with direct photometric measurement. Eur J Physiol 1971;325: 188-190
34. Haycock GB, Schwarz GJ, Wisotsky DH. Body surface area calculated from the height and weight. J Pediatrics 1978;93: 62-66
35. Atiqi R, Van Iersel C, Cleophas TJ. Accuracy of quantitative diagnostic tests. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009;47:153-159
36. Heden B, Edenbrandt L, Hasity WK, Pahlm O. Artificial neural networks for electrocardiographic diagnosis of healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:5-8.
37. Redding NJ, Kowalczyk A, Downs T. Constructive higher order network algorithms that is polynomial time. Neural Network 1993;6:997-1010.
38. Sperduti A, Starita A. Speed up learning and network optimization with extended back propagation. Neural Network 1993; 6:365-383
39. Wnek J, Michalski RS. Hypothesis driven constructive induction in AQ17-HCI: a method and experiments. Mach Learn 1994;14:139-168
40. Lytton WW. From artificial neural network to realistic neural network, chapter 14. In: From computer to brain. New York: Springer, 2002, pp. 259-268