Modes of reception for fictional films

Communications

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 361-384

  Suckfüll, Monika ^a   Scharkow, Michael ^a  

^a BERLIN UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Film reception; Involvement; Modes of reception; Scale development; Structural equation modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649083931     PISSN: 03412059     EISSN: 16134087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/COMM.2009.023     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen, M. & Reynolds, R. (1993). The elaboration likelihood model and the sleeper effect: An assessment of attitude change over time. Communication Theory, 3(1), 73-82
2. Appel, M., Koch, E., Schreier, M., & Groeben, N. (2002). Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung [Aspects of reading experience: Scale development]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14(4), 149-154
3. Bartsch, A., Mangold, R., Viehoff, R., & Vorderer, P. (2006). Emotional gratifications during media use. An integrative approach. Communications, 31(3), 261-278
4. Bilandzic, H. & Busselle, R. W. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508-529
5. Busselle, R. W. & Bilandzic, H. (in print). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology
6. Bordwell, D., Staiger, J., & Thompson, K. (1985). The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style and mode of production. New York: Columbia University Press
7. Burger, J. M. (1995). Need for control and self-esteem: Two routes to a high desire for control. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 217-233). New York: Plenum
8. Byrne, B. M. (1988). Measuring adolescent self-concept: Factorial validity and equivalency of the SDQ III across gender. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 23(3), 361-375
9. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
10. Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131
11. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766
12. Charlton, M. & Borcsa, M. (1997). Thematische Voreingenommenheit, Involvement und Formen der Identifikation. Diskussion eines Modells für das aktive Zuschauerhandeln anhand eines empirischen Beispiels [Thematic preconceptions, involvement and forms of identification]. In M. Charlton & S. Schneider (Eds.), Rezeptionsforschung: Theorien und Untersuchungen zum Umgang mit Massenmedien (pp. 254-267). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag
13. Chen, S. & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford
14. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50
15. Früh, W. (2002). Unterhaltung durch das Fernsehen: Eine molare Theorie [Entertainment through television: A molar theory]. Constance: UVK
16. Gerbing, D. W. & Hamilton, J. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modelling, 3(1), 62-72
17. Goethals, G. R. (1986). Social comparison theory: Psychology from the lost and found. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(3), 261-278
18. Green, M. C. & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721
19. Halff, G. (1998). Die Malaise der Medienwirkungsforschung: Transklassische Wirkungen und klassische Forschung [The malaise of media effect research: Transclassical effects and classical research]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag
20. Hall, A. (2005). Audience personality and the selection of media and media genres. Media Psychology, 7(4), 377-398
21. Hasebrink, U. & Paus-Hasebrink, I. (2005). Dimensionen, Modalitäten, Typen [Dimensions, modalities, types]. In V. Gehrau, H. Bilandzic, & J. Woelke (Eds.), Rezeptionsstrategien und Rezeptionsmodalitäten (pp. 235-245). Munich: Fischer
22. Hoffmann, D. & Schwender, C. (2007). Biographical functions of cinema and film preferences among older German adults: A representative quantitative survey. Communications, 32(4), 473-491
23. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55
24. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford
25. Kroeber-Riel, W. (1990). Konsumentenverhalten [Consumer behavior]. Munich: Vahlen
26. Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 349-356
27. Krugman, H. E. (1966). The measurement of advertising involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 30, 583-596
28. Lee, K.-M. (2004). Presence explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27-50
29. Liebes, T. & Katz, E. (1986). Patterns of involvement in television fiction: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Communication, 1, 151-171
30. Maio, G. R. & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 583-614
31. Mares, M.-L. & Cantor, J. (1992). Elderly viewers' responses to televised portrayals of old age. Empathy and mood management versus social comparison. Communication Research, 19(4), 459-478
32. Neumann-Braun, K. & Schneider, S. (1993). Biografische Dimensionen in der Medienaneignung [Biographical dimensions in media acquisition]. In W. Holly & U. Püschel (Eds.), Medienrezeption als Aneignung (pp. 193-210). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag
33. Osterlind, S. J. (1998). Constructing test items: Multiple-choice, constructed response, performance, and other formats. Boston: Kluwer
34. Palmgreen, P. & Rayburn, J. D. (1982). Gratifications sought and media exposure. An expectancy value model. Communication Research, 9(4), 561-580
35. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81
36. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer
37. Petty, R. E. & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford
38. Rapp, U. (1973). Handeln und Zuschauen. Untersuchungen über den theatersoziologischen Aspekt in der menschlichen Interaktion [Acting and viewing. Theatre-sociological aspects of human interaction]. Darmstadt: Luchterhand
39. Schemer, C., Matthes, J., & Wirth, W. (2008). Toward improving the validity and reliability of media information processing measures in surveys. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(3), 193-225
40. Scherer, K. R. (2001). The nature and study of appraisal: A review of the issues. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 369-392). New York: Oxford University Press
41. Shavitt, S. & Brock, T. C. (1986). Self-relevant responses in commercial persuasion: Field and experimental tests. In J. Olson & K. Sentis (Eds.), Advertising and consumer psychology (pp. 149-171). New York: Praeger
42. Suckfüll, M. (2004). Rezeptionsmodalitäten. Ein integratives Konstrukt für die Medienwirkungsforschung [Modes of Reception. An integrative construct for media effect research]. Munich: Fischer
43. Suckfüll, M. (2007). Emotionale Modalitäten der Filmrezeption [Emotional modes of film reception]. In A. Bartsch, J. Eder, and K. Fahlenbrach (Eds.), Audiovisuelle Emotionen (pp. 218-237). Cologne: Halem
44. Tan, E. S. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
45. Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70
46. Vorderer, P. (1992). Fernsehen als Handlung. Fernsehfilmrezeption aus motivationspsychologischer Perspektive [Television as an act. The reception of television films from the perspective of motivational psychology]. Berlin: Sigma
47. Vorderer, P. (1996). Rezeptionsmotivation: Warum nutzen Rezipienten mediale Unterhaltungsangebote [Reception motives: Why do recipients use media entertainment]? Publizistik, 41(3), 310-326
48. Vorderer, P. (1998). Unterhaltung durch Fernsehen. Welche Rolle spielen parasoziale Beziehungen zwischen Zuschauern und Fernsehakteuren [Entertainment through television. What is the role of parasocial relationships between viewers and TV personas]. In W. Klingler, G. Roters, & O. Zöllner (Eds.), Fernsehforschung in Deutschland (pp. 689-708). Baden-Baden: Nomos
49. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986). Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15, 4-14