Conducting research in information systems: An epistemological journey

Information Systems Research Methods, Epistemology, and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-34

  Kanellis, Panagiotis ^a,b   Papadopoulos, Thanos ^c  

^a ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76649083813     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-040-0.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (147)

1. Albert, T.C., Goes, P.B., & Gupta, A. (2004). GIST: A model for design and management of content and interactivity of customer-centric Web sites. MIS Quarterly 28(2), 161-182.
2. Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (Eds.). (1998). Critical realism: Essential readings. London: Routledge.
3. Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Arnott, D. (2006). Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: A design science approach. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 55-78.
5. Avison, D.E., Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2001). Controlling action research projects. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 28-45.
6. Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., & Nielsen, P.A. (1999). Action research. Comm. of the ACM, 42(1), 94-97.
7. Banville, C., & Landry, M. (1989). Can the field of m-IS be disciplined? Communications of the ACM, 32(1), 48-61.
8. Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2002). IS as a reference discipline. M-IS Quarterly, 26(1), 1-14.
9. Baskerville, R., & Myers, M. (2004). Special issue on action research in IS: Making IS research relevant to practice - foreword. M-IS Quarterly, 28(3), 329-335.
10. Baskerville, R.L., & Wood-Harper, A.T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for IS research. Journal of Information Technology, 11(3), 235-246.
11. Becker, H., & Geer, B. (1969). Participant observation: A comparison. In G.J. McCall & J.L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation. New York: Random House.
12. Becker, J., & Niehaves, B. (2007). Epistemological perspectives on IS research: A framework for analysing and systematizing epistemological assumptions. IS Journal, 17(2), 197-214.
13. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of IS. M-IS Quarterly, 11(3), 369-386.
14. Benbasat, I., & Weber, R. (1996). Research commentary: Rethinking diversity in information system research. IS Research, 7(4), 389-399.
15. Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R.W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. M-IS Quarterly, 27(2), 183-194.
16. Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivity and relativism. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
17. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
18. Bhattacharjee, A., & Paul, R. (2004). Special issue on interpretive approaches to IS and computing. European Journal of IS, 13(3), 166.
19. Boland, R.J. (1983). The in-formation of IS. In R.J. Boland & R.A. Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical issues in IS research (363-394). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Boland, R.J. (1985). Phenomenology: A preferred approach to research on IS. In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald, & T. Wood-Harper (Eds.), Research methods in IS. New York: North-Holland.
21. Boland, R.J. (1993). Accounting and the interpretive act. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 18(2/3), 125-146.
22. Boland, R.J., & Day, W.F. (1989). The experience of system design: A hermeneutic of organizational action. Sc&inavian Journal of Management, 5(2), 87-104.
23. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms & organizational analysis. London, UK: Heinemann Educational Publishers.
24. Butler, T. (1998). Towards a hermeneutic method for interpretive research in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 285-300.
25. Carlsson, S.A. (2006, February). Towards an IS design research framework: A critical realist perspective. Claremont, CA: DESRIST.
26. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
27. Chen, W., & Hirschheim, R. (2004). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of IS research from 1991 to 2001. IS Journal, 14, 197-235.
28. Chua, W.F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 601-632.
29. Ciborra, C.U. (1998a). Crisis and foundations: An inquiry into the nature and limits of models and methods in the IS discipline. Journal of Strategic IS, 7, 5-16.
30. Ciborra, C.U. (1998b). From tool to gestell. Information Technology and People, 11(4), 305-327.
31. Cole, R., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Sein, M.K. (2005). Being proactive: Where action research meets design research. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Conference on IS (pp. 325-336).
32. Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: Combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. IS Journal, 8(4), 273-289
33. DeSanctis, G. (1993). Theory and research: Goals, priorities and approaches. M-IS Quarterly, 17(1), 6-7.
34. Devers, K.J. (1999). How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1153-1188.
35. Dickson, G., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). The management of IS: Research status and themes. In A.M. Jenkins, H.S. Siegle, W. Wojtkowski, & W.G. Wojtkowski (Eds.), Research issues in IS: An agenda for the 1990s. WMC Brown Publishers.
36. Dickson, G., Senn, J.A., & Chervany, N.L. (1977). Research in management IS: The Minnesota experiments. Management Science, 23(9), 913-923.
37. Diesing, P. (1991). How does social science work? Reflections on practice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
38. Drucker, P.F. (1994, September-October). The theory of business. Harvard Business Review, 95-104.
39. Dube, L., & Pare, G. (2003). Rigor in IS positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. M-IS Quarterly, 27(4), 597-635.
40. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
41. Falconer, D.J., & Mackay, D.R. (1999). Ontological problems of pluralist research methodologies. Paper presented at Americas' Conference on IS.
42. Fetterman, D.M. (1989). Ethnography step by step. London, UK: Sage Publications.
43. Fitzgerald, G., Hirschheim, R., Mumford, E., & Wood-Harper, A.T. (1985). Information research methodology: An introduction to the debate. In E. Mumford, G. Fitzgerald, R. Hirschheim, & A.T. Wood-Harper (Eds), Research methods in IS (pp. 3-9), Proceedings of the IFIP (International Federation for Information Processing), WG 8.2 Colloquium, Manchester Business School.
44. Fleetwood, S., & Ackroyd, S. (Eds.). (2004). Critical realist applications in organisation and management studies. London: Routledge.
45. Freedman, D.H. (1992, November-December). Is management still a science? Harvard Business Review, 26-38.
46. Gadamer, H. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47. Galliers, R.D. (1992). Choosing IS research approaches. In R.D. Galliers (Ed.), IS research: Issues, methods & practical guidelines (pp. 144-162). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
48. Gardner, S. (1998). Kant. In A.C. Grayling (Ed.), Philosophy 2: Further through the subject (pp. 574-662). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Glasser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Adeline.
50. Grayling, A.C. (1998). Modern philosophy II: The empiricists. In A.C. Grayling (Ed.), Philosophy 1: A guide through the subject (pp. 484-543). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51. Gregg, D.G., Kulkarni, U.R., & Vinze, A.S. (2001). Understanding the philosophical underpinnings of software engineering research in IS. IS Frontiers, 3(2), 169-183.
52. Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in IS. M-IS Quarterly, 30(3), 611-642.
53. Gregory, R.L. (1987). The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
55. Gummesson, E. (1991). Qualitative methods in management research. London, UK: Sage Publications.
56. nd Edition). London, UK: Routlege.
57. Handy, C. (1980, January-February). Through the organizational looking glass. Harvard Business Review, 115-121.
58. Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), An essential guide to qualitative research methods in organizations (pp. 323-333). London: Sage.
59. Hegel, G.W.F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Heidegger, M. (1976). The piety of thinking (translated by J. G. Hart and J. C. Maraldo). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
61. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in IS research. M-IS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
62. Hirschheim, R. (1992). IS epistemology: A historical perspective. In R.D. Galliers (Ed.), IS research: Issues, methods & practical guidelines. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
63. Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H.K. (1989). Four paradigms of IS development. Communications of the ACM, 32, 1199-1216.
64. Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H.K. (2003). Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline. Journal of the Association for IS, 4(5), 237-293.
65. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., & Lyytinen, K. (1995). IS development and data modelling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., & Newman, M. (1991). IS development as social action: Perspective and practice. Omega, 19(6), 587-608.
67. Iivari, J. (2003). The IS core -VII towards IS as a science of meta-artifacts. Communications of the Association for IS, 12, 568-581.
68. Ilharco, F. (2002) Information technology as ontology. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. London School of Economics, London, UK.
69. Introna, L. (1997) Management, information and power. London: Macmillan.
70. Introna, L., & Ilharco, F. (2004). Phenomenology, screens and the world: A journey with Hursell and Heidegger into phenomenology. In L. Willcocks & J. Mingers (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for IS (pp. 56-102). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
71. Iversen, J.H., Mathiassen, L., & Nielsen, P.A. Managing risk in software process improvement: An action research approach. MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 395-433.
72. Ives, B., Hamilton, S., & Davis, G.B. (1980). A framework for research in computer-based management IS. Management Science, 26(9), 910-934.
73. Janaway, C. (1998). Ancient Greek philosophy I: The pre-Socratics and Plato. In A.C. Grayling (Ed.), Philosophy 1: A guide through the subject (pp. 336-397). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74. Keen, P.G.W. (1991). Relevance and rigor in IS research: Improving quality, confidence, cohesion and impact. In H.E. Nissen, H. Klein, & R. Hirschheim (Eds.), IS research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions (pp. 27-49). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
75. Klein, H.K., Hirschheim, R., & Nissen, H.E. (1991). A pluralist perspective of the IS research arena. In H.E. Nissen, H. Klein, & R. Hirschheim (Eds.), IS research: Contemporary approaches and traditions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
76. Klein, H.K., & Myers, M.D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in IS. M-IS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-94.
77. Klein, H. K., & Huynh, M. (2004). The critical social theory of Jurgen Habermas and its implications for IS research. In J. Mingers & L. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems (pp. 157-237). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
78. Knights, D. (1992). Changing spaces: The disruptive impact of a new epistemological location for the study of management. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 514-536.
79. Kohl, H. (1992). From archetype to zeitgeist. NewYork: Little Brown.
80. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
81. Lawson-Tancred, H. (1998). Ancient Greek pilosophy II: Aristotle. In A.C. Grayling (Ed.), Philosophy 1: A guide through the subject (pp. 398-439). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
82. Lee, A.S. (1989). Case studies as natural experiments. Human Relations, 42(2), 117-137.
83. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. In D. Cartwright (Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
84. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. New York: Sage.
85. Lindgren, R., Henfridsson, O., & Schultze, U. (2004). Design principles for competence management systems: A synthesis of an action research study. M-IS Quarterly, 28(3), 435-472.
86. Macredi, R.D., & Sandom, C. (1999). IT-enabled change: Evaluating an improvisational perspective. European Journal of IS, 8, 247-259.
87. March, S.T., & Smith, G. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251-266.
88. Markus, M.L. (1983). Power, politics and m-IS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430-445.
89. Markus, M.L., & Lee, A.S. (1999). Special issue on intensive research in IS: Using qualitative, interpretive, and case study methods to study information technology. M-IS Quarterly, 23(1), 35-38.
90. nd installment; foreword). M-IS Quarterly, 24(1), 1.
91. Markus, M.L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.
92. th Australasian Conference on IS, Sydney.
93. Martensson, P., & Lee, A.S. (2004). Dialogical action research at omega corporation. M-IS Quarterly, 28(3), 507-536.
94. McGrath, K. (2002). The golden circle: A way of arguing and acting about technology in the London ambulance service. European Journal of IS, 11(4), 251-266.
95. Mingers, J. (2001a). Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. IS Research, 12, 240-259.
96. Mingers, J. (2001b). Embodying IS: The contribution of phenomenology. Information and Organization, 11(2), 103-128.
97. Mingers, J. (2004). Real-izing IS: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for IS. Information & Organization, 14, 87-103.
98. Mowschowitz, A. (1981). On approaches to the study of social issues in computing. Communications of the ACM, 24(3), 146-155.
99. Myers, M. (1997). Qualitative research in IS. M-IS Quarterly, 21(2), 241-242
100. Myers, M. (2004). Hermeneutics in IS research. In J. Mingers and L. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for IS (pp. 103-128). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
101. Myrdall, G. (1970). Objectivity in social research. London, UK: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.
102. Nolan, R.L. (1973). Managing the computer resource: A stage hypothesis. Communications of the ACM, 16(7), 399-405.
103. Nunamaker, J., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. (1991). System development in IS research. Journal of Management IS, 7(3), 89-106.
104. Orlikowski, W.J., & Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying IT in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. IS Research, 2(1), 1-28.
105. Ormerod, R.J. (1996). IS strategy development at Sainsbury's Supermarkets: Using soft OR. Interfaces, 26(1), 102-130.
106. Pierce, C.S. (1931). Collected papers. In C. Harshorne & P. Weiss (Eds). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107. Powers, R., & Dickson, G.W. (1973). M-IS project management. California Management Review, 15(3), 127-56
108. Pratt, V. (1978). The philosophy of the social sciences. London, UK: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
109. Purao, S. (2002). Design research in technology and IS: Truth or dare. Unpublished paper, School of Information Sciences and Technology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA.
110. Rapoport, R.N. (1970). Three dilemmas of action research. Human Relations, 23(6), 499-513.
111. Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
112. Robey, D., & Newman, M. (1996). Sequential patterns in IS development: An application of a social process model. ACM Transactions on IS, 14(1), 30-63.
113. Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.
114. Rosen, M. (1998). Continental philosophy from Hegel. In A.C. Grayling (Ed.), Philosophy 2: Further through the subject (pp. 663-704). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
115. Scruton, R. (1998). Modern philosophy I: The rationalists and Kant. In A.C. Grayling (Ed.), Phi losophy 1: A guide through the subject (pp. 440-483). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
116. Smith, N.G. (1990). The case study: A useful research method for information management. Journal of Information Technology, 5, 123-133.
117. Stowell, F., & Mingers, J. (1997). Introduction. In J. Mingers, & F. Stowell (Eds.), IS: An emerging discipline? London: McGraw-Hill.
118. Straub, D.W., Ang, S., & Evaristo, R. (1984, February). Normative standards for IS research. Database, 21-34.
119. Street, C., & Meister, D.B. (2004). Small business growth and internal transparency: The role of IS. M-IS Quarterly, 28(3), 473-506.
120. Sturgeon, S., Martin, M.G.F., & Grayling, A.C. (1998). Epistemology. In A.C. Grayling (Ed.), Philosophy 1: A guide through the subject (pp. 7-60). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
121. Swanson, E.B., & Ramiller, N.C. (1993). IS research thematics: Submission to a new journal, 1987-1992. IS Research, 4(4), 299-329.
122. Takeda, H., Veerkamp, P., Tomiyama, T., & Yoshikawam, H. (1990, Winter). Modeling design processes. AI Magazine, 37-48.
123. Thomas, P. (1996). The devil is in the detail: Revealing the social and political processes of technology management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(1), 71-84.
124. Trist, E. (1976). N-gaging with large-scale systems. In A. Clark (Ed.), Experimenting with or-ganizational life: The action research approach (pp. 43-75). New York: Plenum.
125. Tsoukas, H. (1994). From social engineering to reflective action in organizational behaviour. In H. Tsoukas (Ed.), New thinking in organizational behaviour (pp. 1-22). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
126. Turner, J.A., Bikson, T.K., Lyytinen, K., Mathiassen, L., & Orlikowski, W. (1991). Relevance vs. rigor in IS research: An issue of quality. In H.E. Nissen, H.K. Klein, & R. Hirschheim (Eds.), IS research: Contemporary approaches & emergent traditions (pp. 715-745). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier
127. Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, W. (2005). Design research in IS. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from http://www.VaishnaviandKuechler,2005.org/Researchdesign/drisVaishnaviandKuechler,2005.htm
128. Van Aken, J.E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219-246.
129. Van Maanen, J. (1995). Representation in ethnography. London, UK: Sage Publications
130. Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004) Review: The resource-based view and information system research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. M-IS Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.
131. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., & El Sawy, O.A. (1992). Building an IS design theory for vigilant e-IS. IS Research, 3(1), 36-59.
132. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., & El Sawy, O.A. (2004). Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition? Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6(2), 43-58.
133. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting IS in organizations. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
134. Walsham, G. (1995a). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of IS, 4, 74-81.
135. Walsham, G. (1995b). The emergence of interpetivism in IS research. IS Research, 6(4), 376-394.
136. Walsham, G. (1995c). Interpetive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of IS, 4, 74-81.
137. Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of IS, 15, 320-330.
138. Watson, R. (2001). Research in IS: What we haven't learned. M-IS Quarterly, 25(4), 5-15.
139. Weber, R. (2003). Editor's comment: Theoretically speaking. M-IS Quarterly, 27(3), 3-13.
140. Weber, R. (2004). The rhetoric of positivism vs. interpretivism. M-IS Quarterly, 28(1), 3-12.
141. Wicks, A.C., & Freeman, R.E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123-140.
142. Williams, B. (1995). Ethics. In A.C. Grayling (Ed.), Philosophy. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
143. Yin, R.K. (1981, March). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 58-65.
144. Yin, R.K. (1989). Research design issues in using the case study method to study management IS. In J.I.a.L. Cash (Ed.), The IS research challenge: Qualitative research methods (pp. 1-6). Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.
145. nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
146. Yin, R K (2003). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
147. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine. New York: Basic Books.