Standardizing and personalizing science in medical education

Academic Medicine

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 356-362

  Lambert, David R ^a   Lurie, Stephen J ^a   Lyness, Jeffrey M ^a   Ward, Denham S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76549129254     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c87f73     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Flexner A. Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 4. New York, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910. Available at: http://www. carnegiefoundation.org/elibrary. Accessed October 21, 2009.
2. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977; 196:129-136.
3. Donner RS, Bickley H. Problem-based learning in American medical education: An overview. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993;81:294-298.
4. Peeraer G, DeWinter BY, Muijtjens AM, Remmen R, Bossaert L, Scherpbier AJ. Evaluating the effectiveness of curriculum change. Is there a difference between graduating student outcomes from two different curricula? Med Teach. 2008;16:1-5.
5. Emanuel EJ. Changing premed requirements and the medical curriculum. JAMA. 2006; 296:1128-1131.
6. Dalen JE, Alpert JS. Premed requirements: The time for change is long overdue! Am J Med. 2009;122:104-106.
7. Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner Report. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:1339-1344.
8. Mann M. The basic sciences sixty five years after the Flexner Report. J Natl Med Assoc. 1976;68:167-169.
9. McGaghie WC. Assessing readiness for medical education: Evolution of the medical college admission test. JAMA. 2002;288: 1085-1090.
10. Erdmann JB. The medical college admission test and the selection of medical students. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:386-389.
11. Association of American Medical Colleges- Howard Hughes Medical Institute Committee. Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians. Available at: https://services.aamc. org/publications/showfile.cfm?file-version132. pdf&prd-id-262&prv-id-321&pdf-id- 132. Accessed October 21, 2009.
12. McCue JD. Influence of medical and premedical education on important personal qualities of physicians. Am J Med. 1985;78: 985-991.
13. Harris S. AAMC launches review of MCAT exam. AAMC Reporter. 2009;18:1, 4. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/ reporter/feb09/mcat.htm. Accessed October 21, 2009.
14. Thomas L. The medusa and the snail. N Engl J Med. 1977;296:1103-1105.
15. Gunderman RB, Kanter SL. Perspective: "How to fix the premedical curriculum" revisited. Acad Med. 2008:83;1158-1161.
16. Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine; Society of General Internal Medicine. Core Medicine Clerkship Curriculum Guide: A Resource for Teachers and Learners. Version 3.0. Available at: http://www.im.org/Resources/ Education/Students/Learning/Documents/ OnlineCDIMCurriculum.pdf. Accessed October 28, 2009.
17. The American Physiological Society Association of Chairs of Departments of Physiology. Medical Physiology Curriculum Objective Project. Available at: http://www.theaps. org/education/MedPhysObj/medcor.htm. Accessed October 28, 2009.
18. Macaulay W, Mellman LA, Quest DO, Nichols GL, Haddad J Jr, Puchner PJ. The advisory dean program: A personalized approach to academic and career advising for medical students. Acad Med. 2007;82:718-722.
19. Dannefer EF, Henson LC. The portfolio approach to competency-based assessment at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine. Acad Med. 2007;82:493-502.
20. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. Common Program Requirements: General Competencies. Available at: http:// www.acgme.org/Outcome/ comp/ GeneralCompetenciesStandards21307.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2009.
21. USMLE moves to next step in design review. NBME Examiner. 2008;55:1.
22. Lurie SJ, Mooney CJ, Lyness JM. Measurement of the general comptencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: A systematic review. Acad Med. 2009;84:301-309.
23. American Board of Medical Specialties. MOC competencies and criteria. Available at: http://abms.org/Maintenance-of- Certification/MOC-competencies. aspx. Accessed October 28, 2009.