Lessons from dynamic cadaver and invasive bone pin studies: Do we know how the foot really moves during gait?

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Nester, Christopher J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76549103827     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17571146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-18     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Jenkyn TR, Anas K, Nichol A. Foot segment kinematics during normal walking using a multisegment model of the foot and ankle complex. J Biomech Eng 2009, 131(3):034504. 10.1115/1.2907750, 19154075.
2. Ness ME, Long J, Marks R, Harris G. Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait Posture 2008, 27(2):331-9. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.04.014, 17583511.
3. Rao S, Saltzman C, Yack HJ. Segmental foot mobility in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007, 22(4):464-71. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.013, 17320257.
4. Stebbins J, Harrington M, Thompson N, Zavatsky A, Theologis T. Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children. Gait Posture 2006, 23(4):401-10. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.03.002, 15914005.
5. Leardini A, Benedetti MG, Berti L, Bettinelli D, Nativo R, Giannini S. Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture 2007, 25(3):453-62. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.05.017, 16965916.
6. Kirane YM, Michelson JD, Sharkey NA. Contribution of the flexor hallucis longus to loading of the first metatarsal and first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle Int 2008, 29(4):367-77. 10.3113/FAI.2008.0367, 18442450.
7. Suckel A, Muller O, Herberts T, Langenstein P, Reize P, Wulker N. Talonavicular arthrodesis or triple arthrodesis: peak pressure in the adjacent joints measured in 8 cadaver specimens. Acta Orthop 2007, 78(5):592-7. 10.1080/17453670710014275, 17966017.
8. Suckel A, Muller O, Herberts T, Wulker N. Changes in Chopart joint load following tibiotalar arthrodesis: in vitro analysis of 8 cadaver specimens in a dynamic model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007, 8(8):80. 2014750, 17686174, 10.1186/1471-2474-8-80.
9. Nester CJ, Liu AM, Ward E, Howard D, Cocheba J, Derrick T, Patterson P. In vitro study of foot kinematics using a dynamic walking cadaver model. J Biomech 2007, 40(9):1927-37. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.008, 17081548.
10. Erdemir A, Hamel AJ, Fauth AR, Piazza SJ, Sharkey NA. Dynamic loading of the plantar aponeurosis in walking. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(3):546-52.
11. Ward ED, Smith KM, Cocheba JR, Patterson PE, Phillips RD, William J. Stickel Gold Award. In-vivo forces in the plantar fascia during the stance phase of gait: sequential release of the plantar fascia. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003, 93(6):429-42.
12. Michelson JD, Hamel AJ, Buczek FL, Sharkey NA. Kinematic behavior of the ankle following malleolar fracture repair in a high-fidelity cadaver model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(11):2029-38.
13. Sharkey NA, Hamel AJ. A dynamic cadaver model of the stance phase of gait: performance characteristics and kinetic validation. Clin Biomech 1998, 13(6):420-433.
14. Hurschler C, Emmerich J, Wülker N. In vitro simulation of stance phase gait part I: Model verification. Foot Ankle Int 2003, 24(8):614-22.
15. Wülker N, Hurschler C, Emmerich J. In vitro simulation of stance phase gait part II: Simulated anterior tibial tendon dysfunction and potential compensation. Foot Ankle Int 2003, 24(8):623-9.
16. Kim K, Kitaoka H, Luo Z, et al. In vitro simulation of the stance phase of human gait. J Musculoskeletal Research 2001, 5:113-121.
17. Lundberg A. The foot: block, gearbox, or cushion? Some concepts in foot kinematics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004, 34(9):A6-7.
18. Arndt A, Westblad P, Ekenman I, Lundberg A. A comparison of external plantar loading and in-vivo local metatarsal deformation wearing two different military boots. Gait Posture 2003, 18(2):20-6. 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00191-1, 14654204.
19. Stacoff A, Reinschmidt C, Nigg BM, Bogert AJ, Lundberg A, Denoth J, Stüssi E. Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clin Biomech 2000, 15(1):54-64.
20. Arndt A, Westblad P, Ekenman I, Halvorsen K, Lundberg A. An in vitro comparison of bone deformation measured with surface and staple mounted strain gauges. J Biomech 1999, 32(12):1359-63. 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00129-3, 10569716.
21. Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, Selvik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex - Part 3: Influence of leg rotation. Foot Ankle 1989, 9(6):304-9.
22. Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, Goldie I, Selvik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex - Part 2: Pronation and supination. Foot Ankle 1989, 9(5):248-53.
23. Lundberg A, Goldie I, Kalin B, Selvik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex: plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle 1989, 9(4):194-200.
24. Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Németh G, Selvik G. The axis of rotation of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989, 71(1):94-9.
25. Lundberg A. Kinematics of the ankle and foot. In-vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1989, 233:1-24. 2686345.
26. Lundgren P, Nester C, Liu A, Arndt A, Jones R, Stacoff A, Wolf P, Lundberg A. Invasive in-vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking. Gait Posture 2008, 28(1):93-100. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.009, 18096389.
27. Arndt A, Wolf P, Liu A, Nester C, Stacoff A, Jones R, Lundgren P, Lundberg A. Intrinsic foot kinematics measured in-vivo during the stance phase of slow running. J Biomech 2007, 40(12):2672-2678. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.12.009, 17368465.