A dynamic cadaver model of the stance phase of gait: Performance characteristics and kinetic validation

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 420-433

  Sharkey, Neil A ^a   Hamel, Andrew J ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cadaver; Foot and ankle; Gait; Ground reaction force; Kinematics; Kinetics; Plantar pressure

Indexed keywords

CADAVERIC EXPERIMENTS; FORCE MEASUREMENT; KINEMATICS; MUSCLE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT;

GROUND REACTION FORCES;

GAIT ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY WEIGHT; CADAVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; JOINT FUNCTION; KINETICS; MALE; MUSCLE FORCE; PERFORMANCE; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STANDING; TIBIA;

EID: 0032168721     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00003-5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. [1] Ahl T, Dalen N, Lundberg A, Selvik G. Mobility of the ankle mortise. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:401-2.
2. [2] Close JR, Inman VT, Poor PM, Todd FN. The function of the subtalar joint. Clin Ortho Rel Res 1967;50:159-79.
3. [3] Karrholm J, Hansson LI, Selvik G. Mobility of the lateral malleolus. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:479-83.
4. [4] Lundberg A, Goldie I, Kalin B, Slevik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex:plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. Foot and Ankle 1989;9:194-200.
5. [5] Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, Goldie I, Slevik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex:pronation and supination. Foot and Ankle 1989;9:248-53.
6. [6] Lundberg A, Svensson OK, Bylund C, Slevik G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex:influence of leg rotation. Foot and Ankle 1989;9:304-9.
7. [7] Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RI. Goniometric reliability in a clincal setting:subtalar and ankle joint measurements. Phys Ther 1988;68:672-7.
8. [8] Engsberg JR. A biomechanical analysis of the talocalcaneal joint in vitro. J Biomechanics 1987;4:429-42.
9. [9] Apkarian J, Naumann S, Cairns B. A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb. J Biomechanics 1989;2:143-55.
10. [10] Buczek FL, Kepple T, Lohmann Siegel K, Stanhope SJ. Translational and rotational joint power terms in a six degree-of-freedom model of the normal ankle complex. J Biomechanics 1994;27:1447-57.
11. [11] Delp SL, Statler K, Carroll NC. Preserving plantar flexion strength after surgical treatment for contracture of the triceps surae:a computer simulation study. J Orthop Res 1995;13:96-104.
12. [12] Delp SL, Arnold AS, Speers RA, Moore CA. Hamstrings and psoas lengths during normal and crouch gait:implications for muscle-tendon surgery. J Orthop Res 1996;14:144-51.
13. [13] Scott SH, Winter D. A. Biomechanical model of the human foot:kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. J Biomechanics 1993;9:1091-104.
14. [14] Niki H, Ching RP, Kiser PK, Sangeorzan BJ. The effect of tibialis posterior tendon rupture on hindfoot kinematics. Orthop Res Soc Trans 1997;22:274
15. [15] Thordarson DB, Schmotzer H, Chan J, Peters J. Dynamic support of the human longitudinal arch. Clin Ortho Rel Res 1995;316:165-72.
16. [16] Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990.
17. [17] Sharkey NA, Smith TS, Lundmark DC. Freeze clamping musculo-tendinous junctions for in-vitro simulation of joint mechanics. J Biomechanics 1995;28:631-5.
18. [18] Perry J. Gait Analysis:Normal and Pathological Function. Slack, Thorofare, New Jersey, 1992.
19. [19] Wickiwiecz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Edgerton VR. Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1983;179:275-83.
20. [20] Frederich JA, Brand RA. Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. J Biomechanics 1990;23:91-5.
21. [21] Lippold OCJ. The relation between integrated action potential in human muscle and its isometric tension. J Physiol Lond 1952;117:492-9.
22. [22] Inman V, Ralston HS, Saunders JB, Feinstein MB, Wright EW. Jr. Relation of the human electromyogram to muscular tension. Electroencephr Clin Neurophysiol 1952;4:187-204.
23. [23] Close JR, Nickel ED, Todd FN. Motor-unit action potential counts. J Bone Joint Surg 1960;42A:1207-22.
24. [24] Lawrence JH, De Luca CJ. Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles. J Applied Physiol 1983;54:1653-9.
25. [25] Moritani T, DeVries HA. Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction. Am J Phys Med 1978;57:263-77.
26. [26] Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB. The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. J Physiol Lond 1975;246:549-69.
27. [27] Zuniga EN, Simons DG. Nonlinear relationship between averaged electromyogram potential and muscle tension in normal subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1969;50:613-9.
28. [28] Guimaraes AC, Herzog W, Hullinger M, Zhang YT, Day S. EMG-force relationship of the cat soleus muscle studied with distributed and non-periodic stimulation of ventral root filaments. J Exp Biol 1994;186:75-93.
29. [29] Perry J, Bekey GA. EMG-force relationships in skeletal muscle. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1981;7:1-22.
30. [30] Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Friederich JA. The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. J Biomechanics 1986;19:589-96.
31. [31] Alexander R McN, Jayes AS. Fourier analysis of forces exerted in walking and running. J Biomechanics 1980;13:383-90.
32. [32] Chao EY, Laughman RK, Schneider E, Stauffer RN. Normative data of knee joint motion and ground reaction forces in adult level walking. J Biomechanics 1983;16:219-33.
33. [33] Stauffer RN, Chao YS, Brewster RC. Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1977;127:189-96.
34. [34] Nilsson J, Thorstensson A. Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. Acta Physiol Scand 1989;136:217-27.
35. [35] Gross TS, Bunch RP. Discrete normal plantar stress variations with running speed. J Biomechanics 1989;22:699-703.
36. [36] Hennig EM, Staats A, Rosenbaum D. Plantar pressure distribution patterns of young school children in comparison to adults. Foot and Ankle 1994;15:35-40.
37. [37] Cavanagh PR, Sims DS, Sanders LJ. Body mass is a poor predictor of peak plantar pressure in diabetic men. Diabetes Care 1991;8:750-5.
38. [38] Duckworth T, Boulton AJM, Betts RP, Franks CI, Ward JD. Plantar pressure measurements and the prevention of ulceration in the diabetic foot. J Bone Joint Surg 1982;67B:79-85.
39. [39] Boulton AJM, Hardisty CA, Betts RP, Franks CI, Worth RC, Ward JD, Duckworth T. Dynamic foot pressure and other studies as diagnostic and management aids in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 1983;6:26-33.
40. [40] Patel VG, Wieman TJ. Effect of metatarsal head resection for diabetic foot ulcers on the dynamic plantar pressure distribution. Am J Surg 1994;167:297-301.
41. [41] Holmes GB. Jr, Timmerman L. A quantitative assessment of the effect of metatarsal pads on plantar pressures. Foot and Ankle 1990;11:141-5.
42. [42] Schaff PS, Cavanagh PR. Shoes for the insensitive foot:the effect of a rocker bottom shoe modification on plantar pressure distribution. Foot and Ankle 1990;11:129-140.
43. [43] Perry JE, Ulbrecht JS, Derr JA, Cavanagh PR. The use of running shoes to reduce plantar pressures in patients who have diabetes. J Bone Joint Surg 1995;77A:1819-29.
44. [44] Rodgers M. M. Dynamic foot biomechanics. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 1995;21:306-16.
45. [45] Cavanagh PR, Simoneau GG, Ulbrecht JS. Ulceration, unsteadiness, and uncertainty:the biomechanical consequences of diabetes mellitus. J Biomechanics 1993;26S:23-40.
46. [46] Keaveny TM, Hayes WC. Mechanical properties of cortical and trabecular bone. In Bone, ed. BK Hall. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993, pp. 285-344.
47. [47] Woo SLY, Peterson RH, Ohland KJ, Sites TJ, Danto MI. The effects of stain rate on the properties of the medial collateral ligament in skeletally immature and mature rabbits:a biomechanical and histologic study. J Orthop Res 1990;8:712-21.